Exploring the impact of common assessment instrumentation on communication and collaboration in inpatient and community-based mental health settings: a focus group study

BMC Health Services Research

John P Hirdes¹  Lynn Martin² 

[1] School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada

关键词: interRAI community mental health;    RAI mental health;    interRAI;    Mental health;    Assessment;    Collaboration;    Communication;    Integrated care;   

Others  :  1126014
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-457

 received in 2014-04-02, accepted in 2014-09-29,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Recognition that integrated services can lead to more efficient and effective care has made the principle of integration a priority for health systems worldwide for the last decade. However, actually bringing fully integrated services to life has eluded most health care organizations. Mental health has followed the rule, rather than the exception, when it comes integrating services. The lack of effective mechanisms to evaluate the needs of persons across mental health care services has been an important barrier to communication between professionals involved in care. This study sought to understand communication among inpatient and community-based mental health staff during transfers of care, before and after implementation of compatible assessment instrumentation.

Methods

Two focus groups were held with staff from inpatient (n = 10) and community (n = 10) settings in an urban, specialized psychiatric hospital in Ontario (Canada) – prior to and one year after implementation of compatible instrumentation in the community program. Transcripts were coded and aggregated into themes.

Results

Very different views of current communication patterns during transfers of care emerged. Inpatient mental health staff described a predictable, well-known process, whereas community-based staff emphasized unpredictability. Staff also discussed issues related to trust and the circle of care. All agreed that compatible assessments in inpatient and community mental health settings would facilitate communication through use of a common assessment language. However, no change in communication patterns was reported one year post implementation of compatible instrumentation.

Conclusions

Though all participants agreed on the potential for compatible instrumentation to improve communication during transfers of care, this cannot happen overnight. A number of issues related to trust, evidence-based practice, and organizational factors act as barriers to communication. In particular, staff noted the need for the results of comprehensive mental health assessments to be transformed into meaningful, user-friendly clinical summaries to facilitate uptake of assessment information, and consequently use of a common assessment language across mental health settings.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Martin and Hirdes; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Wijngaarden JDH, de Bont AA, Huijsman R: Learning to cross boundaries: the integration of a health network to deliver seamless care. Health Policy 2006, 79:203-213.
• [2]Craven MA, Bland R: Better practices in collaborative mental health care: an analysis of the evidence base. Can J Psychiatry 2006, 51:7S-72S.
• [3]Lee SJ, Crowther E, Keating C, Kulkarni J: What is needed to deliver collaborative care to address comorbidity more effectively for adults with a severe mental illness. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2013, 47:333-346.
• [4]Canadian Institute for Health Information: About OMHRS. [http://www.cihi.ca/cihi-ext-portal/internet/en/document/types+of+care/specialized+services/mental+health+and+addictions/services_omhrs_about webcite]
• [5]OECD/European Commission: A Good Life in Old Age? Monitoring and Improving Quality in Long-term Care. OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing; 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264194564-en webcite
• [6]Bernabei R, Gray L, Hirdes J, Pei X, Henrard J-C, Jonsson PV, Onder G, Gambassi G, Ikegami N, Hylen Ranhoff A, Capenter IG, Harwood RH, Fries BE, Morris JN, Steel K: International Gerontology. In Hazzards’ Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 6th Edition. Edited by Halter JP, OUslander JG, Tinetti JG, Studenski S, High KP, Asthana S. New York, NY: McGraw Medical; 2009:69-96.
• [7]Steel K, Jònsson PV, Dupasquier JN, Gilgen R, Hirdes J, Schroll M, Ljunggren G, Carpenter I, Bjornson J: Systems of care for frail older persons. interRAI. Trans Am Clin Climatol 1999, 110:30-37.
• [8]Hirdes JP, Curtin-Telegdi N, Rabinowitz T, Fries BE, Morris JN, Ikegami N, Yamauchi K, Smith TF, Pérez E, Martin L, Berg K, Björken M, Declercq A, Finne-Soveri H, Frijters D, Gilgen R, Gray L, Hawes C, Henrard J-C, Ljunggren G, Nonemaker S, Steel K, Szczerbinska K: interRAI Community Mental Health (CMH)–Primer for Use of the interRAI-CMH Assessment Form and User’s Manual. Version 9.2. Washington, DC: interRAI; 2007.
• [9]Martin L, Hirdes JP, Morris JN, Montague P, Rabinowitz T, Fries BE: Validating the mental health assessment protocols in the resident assessment instrument mental health (RAI-MH). J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009, 16:646-653.
• [10]Mathias K, Hirdes JP, Pittman D: A care planning strategy for traumatic life events in community mental health and inpatient psychiatry based on the InterRAI assessment instruments. Community Ment Health J 2010, 46:621-627.
• [11]Ministry of Health and Long-term Care: Every Door is the Right Door: Toward a 10-Year Mental Health and Addictions Strategy – A Discussion Paper. Toronto, ON: Ontario Government; 2009.
• [12]Kreuger RA, Casey MA: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.
• [13]Creswell JW: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2007.
• [14]George L, Durbin J: Moving in the right direction – Articles from Ontario’s systems enhancement evaluation initiative (SEEI). Can J Commun Ment Health 2010, 29(Special Issue Supplement):1-3.