A re-evaluation of the scratch test for locating the liver edge

BMC Gastroenterology

John Attia¹  Nicholas Talley¹  Christian Abel¹  Akash Dhawan¹  Krishan Gupta¹ 

[1] John Hunter Hospital, Division of Medicine, Lookout Rd, 2305, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia

关键词: Liver span;    Liver edge;    Auscultation;    Hepatomegaly;    Scratch test;   

Others  :  858160
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-230X-13-35

 received in 2012-10-29, accepted in 2013-02-19,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

A reliable and accurate estimation of liver size by physical examination is an important aspect of the clinical assessment of a patient. The scratch test uses auscultation to detect the lower liver edge by using the difference in sound transmission through the abdominal cavity over solid and hollow organs. The test is thought to be particularly useful if the abdomen is tense, distended, obese, or very tender. Although the sign is often taught to medical students and residents, the value of the technique for detecting the liver edge has become controversial.

Methods

The study was performed in two parts. In the first part, 18 patients undergoing upper abdominal ultrasound as outpatients were randomly selected and the scratch test was performed by two raters independently, followed by ultrasound (USG) as the reference standard. In the second part of the study, the two raters independently performed the scratch test on separate randomly selected patients (15 patients by rater 1, and 16 patients by rater 2), followed by USG.

Results

Agreement between raters on the scratch test was very high, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.97. The agreement between the raters and the USG was 0.37 using Spearman’s rho. A Bland –Altman plot indicated that, on average, raters underestimated the distance from the right costal margin to the liver edge by only about 2.4 centimeters compared to USG. This translates into 37% and 54% of raters’ estimates falling within 2 and 3 cm of USG estimates. Each unit increase in BMI increased the discrepancy between raters and USG by 0.26 cm (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

The scratch test has very high reproducibility and overall agreement between the scratch test and USG was moderate, with a spearman’s rho of 0.37. The accuracy may potentially be improved by using the point of initial sound transmission rather than the point of maximal transmission. We conclude that the scratch test deserves further investigation.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Gupta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Grimaldi M, Gueli C, Magalotti D, Marchesini G, Pisi E, Zoli M: Physical examination of the liver: Is it still worth it? Am J Gastroenterol 1995, 90:1428-1432.
• [2]Krasner N, Sullivan S, Williams R: The clinical estimation of liver size: a comparison of techniques and an analysis of the source of error. BMJ 1976, 2:1042-1043.
• [3]Hart W, Levi M, Schreuder MC: Physical diagnosis-percussion and palpation of liver. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000, 144:835-838.
• [4]Peternal WW, Schaefer JW, Schiff L: Clinical evaluation of liver size and hepatic scintiscan. Am J Dig Dis 1966, 11:346-350.
• [5]Blendis LM, Law JW, Mcneilly , Sheppard L, Williams R: Observer variation in clinical and radiological assessment of hepatosplenomegaly. BMJ 1970, 1:727-730.
• [6]Jajoo N, Joshi R, Kalantri SP, Singh A, Pai M: Accuracy and reliability of palpation and percussion for detecting hepatomegaly: a rural hospital based study. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004, 23:171-174.
• [7]Burton-Opitz R: A simple auscultatory method of physical diagnosis. N Y State J Med 1925, 25:18-19.
• [8]Camman GP, Clark A: A new mode of ascertaining the dimensions, form and condition of internal organs by percussion. NY J Med Surg 1840, 3:62-96.
• [9]Sapira JD: The Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 1990.
• [10]McGee S: Evidence-based Physical Diagnosis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001.
• [11]Ball JW, Benedict GW, Dains JE, Seidel HM: Mosby’s guide to physical examination. 6th edition. St-Louis: Elsevier; 2006.
• [12]Cristopher MD, Mathews W, Rickman L, Saab S, Tucker WN: The scratch test is unreliable for detecting the liver edge. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997, 25:410-414.
• [13]Fuller GN, Hargreaves MR, King DM: Scratch test in clinical examination of liver. Lancet 1988, 331:181.
• [14]Rennie D, Simel DL: The Rational Clinical Examination. Evidence-based Clinical Diagnosis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
• [15]McCormack DG, Naylor CD, Sullivan SN: The midclavicular line: a wandering landmark. CMAJ 1987, 136:48-50.
• [16]Kratzer W, Fritz V, Mason RA, Haenle MM, Kaechele V, the Roemerstein Study Group: Factors affecting liver size: a sonographic survey of 2080 subjects. J Ultras Med 2003, 22:1155-1161.