Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact

BMC Medicine

David Solomon²  Bo-Christer Björk¹ 

[1] Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland;College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

关键词: scientific publishing;    peer review;    open access;    impact;   

Others  :  1125988
DOI  :  10.1186/1741-7015-10-73

 received in 2012-04-17, accepted in 2012-07-17,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

In the past few years there has been an ongoing debate as to whether the proliferation of open access (OA) publishing would damage the peer review system and put the quality of scientific journal publishing at risk. Our aim was to inform this debate by comparing the scientific impact of OA journals with subscription journals, controlling for journal age, the country of the publisher, discipline and (for OA publishers) their business model.

Methods

The 2-year impact factors (the average number of citations to the articles in a journal) were used as a proxy for scientific impact. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) was used to identify OA journals as well as their business model. Journal age and discipline were obtained from the Ulrich's periodicals directory. Comparisons were performed on the journal level as well as on the article level where the results were weighted by the number of articles published in a journal. A total of 610 OA journals were compared with 7,609 subscription journals using Web of Science citation data while an overlapping set of 1,327 OA journals were compared with 11,124 subscription journals using Scopus data.

Results

Overall, average citation rates, both unweighted and weighted for the number of articles per journal, were about 30% higher for subscription journals. However, after controlling for discipline (medicine and health versus other), age of the journal (three time periods) and the location of the publisher (four largest publishing countries versus other countries) the differences largely disappeared in most subcategories except for journals that had been launched prior to 1996. OA journals that fund publishing with article processing charges (APCs) are on average cited more than other OA journals. In medicine and health, OA journals founded in the last 10 years are receiving about as many citations as subscription journals launched during the same period.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that OA journals indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus are approaching the same scientific impact and quality as subscription journals, particularly in biomedicine and for journals funded by article processing charges.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Björk and Solomon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Björk B-C, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, Guðnason G: Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e11273.
• [2]Solomon DJ, Björk B-C: A study of Open Access Journals using article processing charges. J Am Soc Info Sci Technol, in press.
• [3]Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Darby R, Goerner B, Hyppoelae J, Igo-Kemenes P, Kahn D, Lambert S, Lengenfelder A, Leonard C, Mele S, Nowicka M, Polydoratou P, Ross D, Ruiz-Perez S, Schimmer R, Swaisland M, van der Stelt W: Highlights from the SOAP project survey. [http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5260v2] webciteWhat scientists think about open access publishing
• [4]Dallmeier-Thiessen S, Goerner B, Darby R, Hyppoelae J, Igo-Kemenes P, Kahn D, Lambert S, Lengenfelder A, Leonard C, Mele S, Polydoratou P, Ross D, Ruiz-Perez S, Schimmer R, Swaisland M, van der Stelt W: Open access publishing - models and attributes. [http://edoc.mpg.de/478647] webciteSOAP project report, Max Planck Society digital library; 2010.
• [5]Suber P: Will open access undermine peer review? [http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-07.htm] webcitethe SPARC Open Access Newsletter, issue 113; 2009.
• [6]NIH: NIH Public Access Policy. [http://publicaccess.nih.gov/public_access_policy_implications_2012.pdf] webcite
• [7]Gilbert N: Editor will quit over hoax paper: computer-generated manuscript accepted for publication in open-access journal. [http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090615/full/news.2009.571.html] webciteNature News 2009.
• [8]Järvi U: Open Access Attracts swindlers and idealists [in Finnish]. Finn Med J 2012, 67:666-667.
• [9]Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk B-C, Hedlund T: The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e20961.
• [10]Swan A: The Open Access citation advantage: studies and results to date. [http:/ / openaccess.eprints.org/ index.php?/ archives/ 716-Alma-Swan-Review-of-Studies-on- Open-Access-Impact-Advantage.html] webciteTechnical Report, School of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton; 2010.
• [11]Wagner A: Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. [http://www.istl.org/10-winter/article2.html] webciteIss Sci Technol Librarian 2010., 60
• [12]Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, Gingras Y, Carr L, Gingras Y, Brody T, Harnad S: Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e13636.
• [13]Evans J, Reimer J: Open access and global participation in science. Science 2009, 323:1025.
• [14]Davis P: Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB J 2011, 25:2129-2134.
• [15]McVeigh M: Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact Factors and Citation Patterns. [http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf] webcitecitation study from Thomson Scientific; 2004.
• [16]Giglia E: The impact factor of open access journals: data and trends. [http://elpub.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?102_elpub2010] webciteIn Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (ELPUB 2010) 16-18 June 2010, Helsinki, Finland Edited by Turid Hedlund T, Tonta Y. Hanken School of Economics; 2010, 17-39.
• [17]Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z, de Moya-Anegoin F: Open Access and Scopus: a new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. J Am Soc Info Sci Technol 2011, 62:1130-1145.
• [18]Pislyakov V: Comparing two "thermometers": impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus. Scientometrics 2009, 79:541-550.
• [19]Sicilia M-A, Sánchez-Alonso S, García-Barriocanal E: Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases: the case of Computer Science. J Informetrics 2011, 5:698-704.
• [20]Peters P: Going all the way: how Hindawi became an open access publisher. Learn Pub 2007, 20:191-195.