How do postgraduate GP trainees regulate their learning and what helps and hinders them? A qualitative study

BMC Medical Education

Cees PM van der Vleuten²  Anneke WM Kramer¹  Margaretha H Sagasser¹ 

[1] Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud, The Netherlands;University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

关键词: Qualitative research methods;    Professional development;    Postgraduate training;    Workplace-based learning;    Self-regulation;   

Others  :  1153498
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-12-67

 received in 2012-03-19, accepted in 2012-06-26,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Self-regulation is essential for professional development. It involves monitoring of performance, identifying domains for improvement, undertaking learning activities, applying newly learned knowledge and skills and self-assessing performance. Since self-assessment alone is ineffective in identifying weaknesses, learners should seek external feedback too. Externally regulated educational interventions, like reflection, learning portfolios, assessments and progress meetings, are increasingly used to scaffold self-regulation.

The aim of this study is to explore how postgraduate trainees regulate their learning in the workplace, how external regulation promotes self-regulation and which elements facilitate or impede self-regulation and learning.

Methods

In a qualitative study with a phenomenologic approach we interviewed first- and third-year GP trainees from two universities in the Netherlands. Twenty-one verbatim transcripts were coded. Through iterative discussion the researchers agreed on the interpretation of the data and saturation was reached.

Results

Trainees used a short and a long self-regulation loop. The short loop took one week at most and was focused on problems that were easy to resolve and needed minor learning activities. The long loop was focused on complex or recurring problems needing multiple and planned longitudinal learning activities. External assessments and formal training affected the long but not the short loop. The supervisor had a facilitating role in both loops. Self-confidence was used to gauge competence.Elements influencing self-regulation were classified into three dimensions: personal (strong motivation to become a good doctor), interpersonal (stimulation from others) and contextual (organizational and educational features).

Conclusions

Trainees did purposefully self-regulate their learning. Learning in the short loop may not be visible to others. Trainees should be encouraged to actively seek and use external feedback in both loops. An important question for further research is which educational interventions might be used to scaffold learning in the short loop. Investing in supervisor quality remains important, since they are close to trainee learning in both loops.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Sagasser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1 .

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Regehr G, Eva K: Self-assessment, self-direction, and the self-regulating professional. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 449:34-38.
• [2]Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB: Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. . Med Teach 2006, 28(2):117-128.
• [3]Boekaerts M: Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 1997, 7(2):161-186.
• [4]Mamede S, Schmidt HG: The structure of reflective practice in medicine. Med Educ 2004, 38(12):1302-1308.
• [5]Schön DA: The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York; 1984.
• [6]Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A: Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009, 14(4):595-621.
• [7]Lonka K, Olkinuora E, Makinen J: Aspects and prospects of measuring studying and learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review 2004, 16(4):301-323.
• [8]Vermunt JD: Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. High Educ 1996, 31(1):25-50.
• [9]Vermunt JD, Vermetten YJ: Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review 2004, 16(4):359-384.
• [10]Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L: Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006, 296(9):1094-1102.
• [11]Gordon MJ: A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med 1991, 66(12):762-769.
• [12]Eva KW, Regehr G: "I'll never play professional football" and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28(1):14-19.
• [13]Hodges B, Regehr G, Martin D: Difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence: novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it. Acad Med 2001, 76(10 Suppl):S87-S89.
• [14]Kramer AW, Zuithoff P, Jansen JJ, Tan LH, Grol RP, Van der Vleuten C: Growth of self-perceived clinical competence in postgraduate training for general practice and its relation to potentially influencing factors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007, 12(2):135-145.
• [15]Kruger J, Dunning D: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999, 77(6):1121-1134.
• [16]Tracey JM, Arroll B, Richmond DE, Barham PM: The validity of general practitioners' self assessment of knowledge: cross sectional study. BMJ 1997, 315(7120):1426-1428.
• [17]Sargeant J: Toward a common understanding of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28(1):1-4.
• [18]Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Eva K, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, van der Vleuten C: The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad Med 2010, 85(7):1212-1220.
• [19]Dornan T: Self-assessment in CPD: lessons from the UK undergraduate and postgraduate education domains. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28(1):32-37.
• [20]Duffy FD, Lynn LA, Didura H, Hess B, Caverzagie K, Grosso L, Lipner RA, Holmboe ES: Self-assessment of practice performance: development of the ABIM Practice Improvement Module (PIM). J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28(1):38-46.
• [21]Epstein RM, Siegel DJ, Silberman J: Self-monitoring in clinical practice: a challenge for medical educators. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28(1):5-13.
• [22]Eva KW, Regehr G: Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 2005, 80(10 Suppl):S46-S54.
• [23]Swanwick T: Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: from cognitivism to 'culturism'. Med Educ 2005, 39(8):859-865.
• [24]Driessen E, Van Tartwijk J, Dornan T: The self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective. BMJ 2008, 336(7648):827-830.
• [25]Mansvelder-Longayroux DD: The learning portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Leiden University; PhD Thesis, Leiden; 2008.
• [26]Tochel C, Haig A, Hesketh A, Cadzow A, Beggs K, Colthart I, Peacock H: The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Med Teach 2009, 31(4):320-339.
• [27]Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Scheele F, Driessen EW, Hodges B: The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 24(6):703-719.
• [28]Embo MP, Driessen EW, Valcke M, Van der Vleuten C: Assessment and feedback to facilitate self-directed learning in clinical practice of Midwifery students. Med Teach 2010, 32(7):e263-e269.
• [29]Horsley T, O'Neill J, McGowan J, Perrier L, Kane G, Campbell C: Interventions to improve question formulation in professional practice and self-directed learning (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 5:CD007335.
• [30]Li ST, Paterniti DA, Co JP, West DC: Successful self-directed lifelong learning in medicine: a conceptual model derived from qualitative analysis of a national survey of pediatric residents. Acad Med 2010, 85(7):1229-1236.
• [31]Mazmanian P, Feldman M: Theory is needed to improve education, assessment and policy in self-directed learning. Med Educ 2011, 45(4):324-326.
• [32]White CB: Smoothing out transitions: how pedagogy influences medical students' achievement of self-regulated learning goals. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007, 12(3):279-297.
• [33]White CB, Fantone JC: Pass-fail grading: laying the foundation for self-regulated learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010, 15(4):469-477.
• [34]Dowling M: From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. Int J Nurs Stud 2007, 44(1):131-142.
• [35]Giorgi B: Can an Empirical Psychology Be Drawn from Husserl's Phenomenology? In Phenomenology and Psychological Science, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Edited by Ashworth PD, Chung MC. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York; 2006:69-88.
• [36]Elstein AS: Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009, 14(Suppl 1):7-18.
• [37]Norman G: Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends. Med Educ 2005, 39(4):418-427.
• [38]Van Berkestijn LGM: Learning to learn. Curricular changes in the postgraduate training for general practitioners. [Leren leren. Over de vernieuwing van de huisartsopleiding]. Huisarts en Wetenschap 2002, 45(5)):248-252.
• [39]Gibson WB: A: Working with qualitative data. Sage, Los Angeles, CA; 2009.
• [40]Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd edition. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oakes, California; 1994.
• [41]Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F: Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 1999, 9(1):26-44.
• [42]Norlyk A, Harder I: What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qual Health Res 2010, 20(3):420-431.
• [43]Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Finding the findings in qualitative studies. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002, 34(3):213-219.
• [44]Deci EL, Ryan RM: Handbook of Self-Determination Research. The University of Rochester Press, Rochester; 2002.
• [45]Ryan RM, Deci EL: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000, 55(1):68-78.
• [46]Williams GC, Saizow RB, Ryan RM: The importance of self-determination theory for medical education. Acad Med 1999, 74(9):992-995.
• [47]Eraut M: Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br J Educ Psychol 2000, 70(1):113-136.
• [48]Eraut M: Informal Learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 2004, 26(2):247-273.
• [49]Stegeman JH: Apprenticed to modern masters. PhD Thesis. [Gezel bij moderne meesters [dissertatie]]. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam; 2008.
• [50]Sargeant J, Mann K, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J: "Directed" self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008, 28(1):47-54.
• [51]Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illin J, McKinstry B: The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Med Teach 2008, 30(2):124-145.
• [52]Bolhuis S: Professional learning: what is it and how can we promote it? Dutch Journal of Medical Education 2002, 21(4):173-182.
• [53]Van Woerkom M: The concept of critical reflection and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources 2004, 6(2):178-192.
• [54]Miller GE: The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990, 65(9 Suppl):S63-S67.
• [55]Deci EL, Ryan RM: The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 2000, 11(4):227-268.
• [56]Bandura A, Locke EA: Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Psychol 2003, 88(1):87-99.
• [57]Dory V, Beaulieu MD, Pestiaux D, Pouchain D, Gay B, Rocher G, Boucher L: The development of self-efficacy beliefs during general practice vocational training: an exploratory study. Med Teach 2009, 31(1):39-44.
• [58]Kaufman DM: Applying educational theory in practice. BMJ 2003, 326(7382):213-216.
• [59]Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B: AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Med Teach 2007, 29(1):2-19.
• [60]Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R: What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Acad Med 2008, 83(5):452-466.
• [61]Dornan T, Scherpbier A, Boshuizen H: Supporting medical students' workplace learning: experience-based learning (ExBL). Clin Teach 2009, 6:167-171.
• [62]Dornan T, Hadfield J, Brown M, Boshuizen H, Scherpbier A: How can medical students learn in a self-directed way in the clinical environment? Design-based research. Med Educ 2005, 39(4):356-364.
• [63]Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A: Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. Med Educ 2007, 41(1):84-91.
• [64]Stok-Koch L, Bolhuis S, Koopmans R: Identifying factors that influence workplace learning in postgraduate medical education. Educ Health 2007, 20(1):1-9.
• [65]Brydges R, Butler D: A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice. Med Educ 2012, 46(1):71-79.