BMC Surgery | |
Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and recovery in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery | |
Jingxin Zhao1  Li Liang1  Feng Yang1  Mingsheng Tan1  Houfu Sheng1  Zhongshi Li1  Haibo Zou1  | |
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghua Dongjie, Hepingli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, P. R. China | |
关键词: Spine surgery; Close and open of drainage tube; Postoperative drainage volume; Intraoperative blood loss; | |
Others : 1215943 DOI : 10.1186/s12893-015-0062-9 |
|
received in 2014-11-10, accepted in 2015-06-05, 发布年份 2015 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Spine surgery is widely accepted as an effective management for patients with lumbar disc herniation; however, the factors influencing intraoperative procedure and prognosis are not fully understood. The present study was aimed to identify the factors influencing intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and recovery in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 183 consecutive patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent spine surgery. The clinical characteristics, operation procedure, and outcome were documented and the correlations were analyzed.
Results
There were significant differences between one-level and two-level operations in the bleeding volumes of male (P = 0.005) and female (P = 0.002) patients, and in final drainage of male (P = 0.043) and female (P = 0.003) patients. The blood loss was correlated with the operation duration. There were differences in intraoperative bleeding and final drainage between groups with one-level and two-level operations. Additionally, there were differences in intraoperative autologous blood transfusion among various groups. There were significant differences in intraoperative bleeding between autologous blood transfusion and non-transfusion groups.
Conclusions
The key factors affecting the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume include operation methods, operation duration, blood-transfusion modes, and usage of anticoagulants. These results should be taken into consideration in the attempt to optimize operation procedure and improve post-operative recovery.
【 授权许可】
2015 Zou et al.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150626020213107.pdf | 596KB | download | |
Fig. 3. | 14KB | Image | download |
Fig. 2. | 12KB | Image | download |
Fig. 1. | 29KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Akhaddar A, Boulahroud O, Naama O, Al-Bouzidi A, Boucetta M. Paraspinal textiloma after posterior lumbar surgery: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. World Neurosurg. 2012; 77(2):375-80.
- [2]Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(3):213-21.
- [3]Maus T. Imaging the back pain patient. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010; 21(4):725-66.
- [4]Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ, Ciol MA. Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74(4):536-43.
- [5]Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T et al.. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006; 296(20):2451-9.
- [6]Smith JS, Fu KM, Polly DW, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR et al.. Complication rates of three common spine procedures and rates of thromboembolism following spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine. 2010; 35(24):2140-9.
- [7]Wen SF, Wong IO, Long MJ, Li JG, Li XF, Guo DM, Xu ZH, Yin QS. Effectiveness of 3 surgical decompression strategies for treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy in 3 spinal centers in China: a retrospective study. Spine. 2012; 37(17):1463-9.
- [8]Postacchini F. Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1999; 24(10):1043-7.
- [9]Savvidou C, Chatziioannou SN, Pilichou A, Pneumaticos SG. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cell saving blood autotransfusion in adult lumbar fusion. Transfus Med. 2009; 19(4):202-6.
- [10]Sucato DJ. Management of severe spinal deformity: scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine. 2010; 35(25):2186-92.
- [11]Acebal-Cortina G, Suarez-Suarez MA, Garcia-Menendez C, Moro-Barrero L, Iglesias-Colao R, Torres-Perez A. Evaluation of autologous platelet concentrate for intertransverse lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 3:361-6.
- [12]Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Loeser JD. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine. 2009; 34(10):1094-109.
- [13]Endres S, Heinz M, Wilke A. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis with instability: a retrospective case control study. BMC Surg. 2011; 11:29. BioMed Central Full Text
- [14]Epstein NE. Foraminal and far lateral lumbar disc herniations: surgical alternatives and outcome measures. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40(10):491-500.
- [15]Ersen O, Ekinci S, Bilgic S, Kose O, Oguz E, Sehirlioglu A. Posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with or without intraoperative cell salvage system: a retrospective comparison. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012; 96(2):107-10.
- [16]Joseph SA, Berekashvili K, Mariller MM, Rivlin M, Sharma K, Casden A, Bitan F, Kuflik P, Neuwirth M. Blood conservation techniques in spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of patients refusing blood transfusion. Spine. 2008; 33(21):2310-5.
- [17]Brookfield KF, Brown MD, Henriques SM, Buttacavoli FA, Seitz AP. Allogeneic transfusion after predonation of blood for elective spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(8):1949-53.
- [18]Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR et al.. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013; 346:e7586.
- [19]Nezhat FR, Denoble SM, Cho JE, Brown DN, Soto E, Chuang L, Gretz H, Saharia P. Safety and efficacy of video laparoscopic surgical debulking of recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. JSLS. 2012; 16(4):511-8.
- [20]Barr PJ, Donnelly M, Cardwell C, Alam SS, Morris K, Parker M, Bailie KE. Drivers of transfusion decision making and quality of the evidence in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Transfus Med Rev. 2011; 25(4):304-16.e1-6.
- [21]Benini A. Segmental instability and lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Theoretical, clinical and surgical aspects. Neurochirurgia. 1990; 33(5):146-57.
- [22]Bess RS, Lenke LG. Blood loss minimization and blood salvage techniques for complex spinal surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006; 17(3):227-34.
- [23]Cheng F, You J, Rampersaud YR. Relationship between spinal magnetic resonance imaging findings and candidacy for spinal surgery. Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56(9):e323-30.
- [24]Fosco M, Di Fiore M. Factors predicting blood transfusion in different surgical procedures for degenerative spine disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012; 16(13):1853-8.