BMC Medicine | |
Visit-to-visit variability of fasting plasma glucose as predictor of ischemic stroke: competing risk analysis in a national cohort of Taiwan Diabetes Study | |
Tsai-Chung Li1  Sing-Yu Yang4  Kai-Lin Hwang6  Wen-Yuan Lin2  Ching-Chu Chen3  Chiu-Shong Liu2  Chia-Ing Li2  Chun-Pai Yang5  Cheng-Chieh Lin2  | |
[1] Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan;School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan;School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan;Graduate Institute of Biostatistics, College of Management, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan;Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan;Department of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan | |
关键词: Type 2 diabetes; Ischemic stroke; Glucose variation; | |
Others : 1121427 DOI : 10.1186/s12916-014-0165-7 |
|
received in 2014-05-22, accepted in 2014-08-29, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Glycemic variation as an independent predictor of ischemic stroke in type 2 diabetic patients remains unclear. This study examined visit-to-visit variations in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), as represented by the coefficient of variation (CV), for predicting ischemic stroke independently, regardless of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and other conventional risk factors in such patients.
Methods
Type 2 diabetic patients enrolled in the National Diabetes Care Management Program, ≥30 years old and free of ischemic stroke (n = 28,354) in 2002 to 2004 were included, and related factors were analyzed with extended Cox proportional hazards regression models of competing risk data on stroke incidence.
Results
After an average 7.5 years of follow-up, there were 2,250 incident cases of ischemic stroke, giving a crude incidence rate of 10.56/1,000 person-years (11.64 for men, 9.63 for women). After multivariate adjustment, hazard ratios for the second, third and fourth versus first FPG-CV quartile were 1.11 (0.98, 1.25), 1.22 (1.08, 1.38) and 1.27 (1.12, 1.43), respectively, without considering HbA1c, and 1.09 (0.96, 1.23), 1.16 (1.03, 1.31) and 1.17 (1.03, 1.32), respectively, after considering HbA1c.
Conclusions
Besides HbA1c, FPG-CV was a potent predictor of ischemic stroke in type 2 diabetic patients, suggesting that different therapeutic strategies now in use be rated for their potential to (1) minimize glucose fluctuations and (2) reduce HbA1c level in type 2 diabetic patients to prevent ischemic stroke.
【 授权许可】
2014 Lin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150212022445561.pdf | 554KB | download | |
Figure 3. | 18KB | Image | download |
Figure 2. | 62KB | Image | download |
Figure 1. | 27KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Rautio A, Eliasson M, Stegmayr B: Favorable trends in the incidence and outcome in stroke in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects: findings from the Northern Sweden MONICA Stroke Registry in 1985 to 2003. Stroke 2008, 39:3137-3144.
- [2]Jeerakathil T, Johnson JA, Simpson SH, Majumdar SR: Short-term risk for stroke is doubled in persons with newly treated type 2 diabetes compared with persons without diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Stroke 2007, 38:1739-1743.
- [3]Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ, Appel LJ, Braun LT, Chaturvedi S, Creager MA, Culebras A, Eckel RH, Hart RG, Hinchey JA, Howard VJ, Jauch EC, Levine SR, Meschia JF, Moore WS, Nixon JV, Pearson TA: Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011, 42:517-584.
- [4]Skyler JS, Bergenstal R, Bonow RO, Buse J, Deedwania P, Gale EA, Howard BV, Kirkman MS, Kosiborod M, Reaven P, Sherwin RS: Intensive glycemic control and the prevention of cardiovascular events: implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA diabetes trials: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and a scientific statement of the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009, 119:351-357.
- [5]Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010 Diabetes Care 2010, 33:S11-S61.
- [6]Ceriello A, Ihnat MA: ‘Glycemic variability’: a new therapeutic challenge in diabetes and the critical care setting. Diabet Med 2010, 27:862-867.
- [7]Siegelaar SE, Holleman F, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH: Glucose variability; does it matter? Endocr Rev 2010, 31:171-182.
- [8]Ceriello A, Kilpatrick ES: Glycemic variability: both sides of the story. Diabetes Care 2013, 36:S272-S275.
- [9]Kohnert KD, Freyse EJ, Salzsieder E: Glycaemic variability and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction. Curr Diabetes Rev 2012, 8:345-354.
- [10]Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, Ihnat MA, Thorpe JE, Testa R, Boemi M, Giugliano D: Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 2008, 57:1349-1354.
- [11]Muggeo M, Verlato G, Bonora E, Bressan F, Girotto S, Corbellini M, Gemma ML, Moghetti P, Zenere M, Cacciatori V, Zoppini G, De Marco R: The Verona Diabetes Study: a population-based survey on known diabetes mellitus prevalence and 5-year all-cause mortality. Diabetologia 1995, 38:318-325.
- [12]Muggeo M, Zoppini G, Bonora E, Brun E, Bonadonna RC, Moghetti P, Verlato G: Fasting plasma glucose variability predicts 10-year survival of type 2 diabetic patients: the verona diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2000, 23:45-50.
- [13]Lin CC, Li CI, Yang SY, Liu CS, Chen CC, Fuh MM, Chen W, Li TC: Variation of fasting plasma glucose: a predictor of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Med 2012, 125:e9-e18.
- [14]Lin CC, Li CI, Liu CS, Lin WY, Chen CC, Yang SY, Lee CC, Li TC: Annual fasting plasma glucose variation increases risk of cancer incidence and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Taichung Diabetes Study. Endocr Relat Cancer 2012, 19:473-483.
- [15]Nalysnyk L, Hernandez-Medina M, Krishnarajah G: Glycaemic variability and complications in patients with diabetes mellitus: evidence from a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Obes Metab 2010, 12:288-298.
- [16]Wu VC, Huang TM, Wu PC, Wang WJ, Chao CT, Yang SY, Shiao CC, Hu FC, Lai CF, Lin YF, Han YY, Chen YS, Hsu RB, Young GH, Wang SS, Tsai PR, Chen YM, Chao TT, Ko WJ, Wu KD: Preoperative proteinuria is associated with long-term progression to chronic dialysis and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. PLoS One 2012, 7:e27687.
- [17][http:/ / www.nhi.gov.tw/ English/ webdata/ webdata.aspx?menu=11&menu_id=296&WD _ID=296&webdata_id=4010] webcite National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare: The National Health Insurance Statistics, 2010; 2010. Available at: ; In Chinese.
- [18]Cheng CL, Kao YH, Lin SJ, Lee CH, Lai ML: Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011, 20:236-242.
- [19]Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin S: A1C variability and the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:2022-2198.
- [20]Lunn M, McNeil D: Applying Cox regression to competing risks. Biometrics 1995, 51:524-532.
- [21]Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Malone JI, Nathan DM, Peterson CM: Tests of glycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003, 26:S106-S108.
- [22]Heo SH, Lee SH, Kim BJ, Kang BS, Yoon BW: Does glycated hemoglobin have clinical significance in ischemic stroke patients? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010, 112:98-102.
- [23]Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA: Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000, 321:405-412.
- [24]Selvin E, Coresh J, Shahar E, Zhang L, Steffes M, Sharrett AR: Glycaemia (haemoglobin A1c) and incident ischaemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Lancet Neurol 2005, 4:821-826.
- [25]Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Bigger JT, Buse JB, Cushman WC, Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F, Grimm RH Jr, Probstfield JL, Simons-Morton DG, Friedewald WT: Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:2545-2559.
- [26]Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Reda D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, Zieve FJ, Marks J, Davis SN, Hayward R, Warren SR, Goldman S, McCarren M, Vitek ME, Henderson WG, Huang GD: Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:129-139.
- [27]Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, Woodward M, Marre M, Cooper M, Glasziou P, Grobbee D, Hamet P, Harrap S, Heller S, Liu L, Mancia G, Mogensen CE, Pan C, Poulter N, Rodgers A, Williams B, Bompoint S, de Galan BE, Joshi R, Travert F: Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:2560-2572.
- [28]Brownlee M, Hirsch IB: Glycemic variability: a hemoglobin A1c independent risk factor for diabetic complications. JAMA 2006, 295:1707-1708.
- [29]Gimeno-Orna JA, Castro-Alonso FJ, Boned-Juliani B, Lou-Arnal LM: Fasting plasma glucose variability as a risk factor of retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complications 2003, 17:78-81.
- [30]Zoppini G, Verlato G, Targher G, Bonora E, Trombetta M, Muggeo M: The Verona Diabetes Study. Variability of body weight, pulse pressure and glycaemia strongly predict total mortality in elderly type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008, 24:624-628.
- [31]Hirsch IB, Brownlee M: Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control? J Diabetes Complications 2005, 19:178-181.
- [32]Eslami S, Taherzadeh Z, Schultz MJ, Abu-Hanna A: Glucose variability measures and their effect on mortality: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2011, 37:583-593.
- [33]Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol JP, Colette C: Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2006, 295:1681-1687.
- [34]Hu Y, Liu W, Huang R, Zhang X: Postchallenge plasma glucose excursions, carotid intima-media thickness, and risk factors for atherosclerosis in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 2010, 210:302-306.
- [35]Temelkova-Kurktschiev TS, Koehler C, Henkel E, Leonhardt W, Fuecker K, Hanefeld M: Postchallenge plasma glucose and glycemic spikes are more strongly associated with atherosclerosis than fasting glucose or HbA1c level. Diabetes Care 2000, 23:1830-1834.
- [36]Barbieri M, Rizzo MR, Marfella R, Boccardi V, Esposito A, Pansini A, Paolisso G: Decreased carotid atherosclerotic process by control of daily acute glucose fluctuations in diabetic patients treated by DPP-IV inhibitors. Atherosclerosis 2013, 227:349-354.
- [37]Zoungas S, Patel A, Chalmers J, de Galan BE, Li Q, Billot L, Woodward M, Ninomiya T, Neal B, MacMahon S, Grobbee DE, Kengne AP, Marre M, Heller S: Severe hypoglycemia and risks of vascular events and death. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:1410-1418.
- [38]Yakubovich N, Gerstein HC: Serious cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes: the role of hypoglycemia. Circulation 2011, 123:342-348.
- [39]Ceriello A, Novials A, Ortega E, La Sala L, Pujadas G, Testa R, Bonfigli AR, Esposito K, Giugliano D: Evidence that hyperglycemia after recovery from hypoglycemia worsens endothelial function and increases oxidative stress and inflammation in healthy control subjects and subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2012, 61:2993-2997.
- [40]Service FJ: Glucose variability. Diabetes 2013, 62:1398-1404.
- [41]DeVries JH: Glucose variability: where it is important and how to measure it. Diabetes 2013, 62:1405-1408.
- [42]Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria Arch Intern Med 2001, 161:397-405.
- [43]Meigs JB, Nathan DM, D'Agostino RB Sr, Wilson PW: Fasting and postchallenge glycemia and cardiovascular disease risk: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes Care 2002, 25:1845-1850.