Impact of personal goals on the internal medicine R4 subspecialty match: a Q methodology study

BMC Medical Education

Narmin Kassam¹  Vijay J Daniels¹ 

[1]Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

关键词: Canada;    Specialization;    Postgraduate medical education;    Q methodology;    Internal medicine;    Career choice;   

Others  :  1135728
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-13-171

 received in 2013-04-26, accepted in 2013-12-18,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

There has been a decline in interest in general internal medicine that has resulted in a discrepancy between internal medicine residents’ choice in the R4 subspecialty match and societal need. Few studies have focused on the relative importance of personal goals and their impact on residents’ choice. The purpose of this study was to assess if internal medicine residents can be grouped based on their personal goals and how each group prioritizes these goals compared to each other. A secondary objective was to explore whether we could predict a resident’s desired subspecialty choice based on their constellation of personal goals.

Methods

We used Q methodology to examine how postgraduate year 1–3 internal medicine residents could be grouped based on their rankings of 36 statements (derived from our previous qualitative study). Using each groups’ defining and distinguishing statements, we predicted their subspecialties of interest. We also collected the residents’ first choice in the subspecialty match and used a kappa test to compare our predicted subspecialty group to the residents’ self-reported first choice.

Results

Fifty-nine internal medicine residents at the University of Alberta participated between 2009 and 2010 with 46 Q sorts suitable for analysis. The residents loaded onto four factors (groups) based on how they ranked statements. Our prediction of each groups’ desired subspecialties with their defining and/or distinguishing statements are as follows: group 1 – general internal medicine (variety in practice); group 2 – gastroenterology, nephrology, and respirology (higher income); group 3 – cardiology and critical care (procedural, willing to entertain longer training); group 4 – rest of subspecialties (non-procedural, focused practice, and valuing more time for personal life). There was moderate agreement (kappa = 0.57) between our predicted desired subspecialty group and residents’ self-reported first choice (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study suggests that most residents fall into four groups based on a constellation of personal goals when choosing an internal medicine subspecialty. The key goals that define and/or distinguish between these groups are breadth of practice, lifestyle, desire to do procedures, length of training, and future income potential. Using these groups, we were able to predict residents’ first subspecialty group with moderate success.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Daniels and Kassam; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]American College of Physicians: Creating a new national workforce for internal medicine. http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/where_we_stand/policy/im_workforce.pdf webcite
• [2]Association of American Medical Colleges: The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections through 2025. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/The%20Complexities%20of%20Physician%20Supply.pdf webcite. Accessed March 20, 2013
• [3]Canadian Society of Internal Medicine: “Care-Fully” Defining a Plan for General Internal Medicine in Canada. 2005. [http://www.csimonline.com webcite], Accessed December 23, 2008.
• [4]Patel MJ, Riaz M, Tariq M, Jamil S, Ansari T, Khan MS, Samdani AJ, Ayaz SI, Sorathia A, Akhtar J: Career goals of trainee physicians in internal medicine. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2008, 18(6):352-356.
• [5]Puchner R: Job satisfaction and prospects of internal medicine specialists in Austria–an analysis of the profession. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2007, 119(17–18):503-511.
• [6]Stuyt PM, de Graaf J, van der Meer JW: Who does become an internist? Neth J Med 2004, 62(3):98-101.
• [7]Waeber G, Cornuz J, Gaspoz JM, Pécoud A, Perrier A: Perspectives and challenges to guarantee training and renewal in general internal medicine. Rev Med Suisse 2009, 5(188):232-236.
• [8]Garibaldi RA, Popkave C, Bylsma W: Career plans for trainees in internal medicine residency programs. Acad Med 2005, 80(5):507-512.
• [9]West CP, Dupras DM: General medicine vs subspecialty career plans among internal medicine residents. JAMA 2012, 308(21):2241-2247.
• [10]Canadian post-MD education registry [http://www.caper.ca webcite]: Available from: http://www.caper.ca/download_publications_en.php webcite. Accessed March 19, 2012
• [11]McAlister FA: In search of shakespeareans. CJGIM 2010, 5(4):149.
• [12]Grosso LJ, Goode LD, Kimball HR, Kooker DJ, Jacobs C, Lattie G: The subspecialization rate of third year internal medicine residents from 1992 through 1998. Teach Learn Med 2004, 16(1):7-13.
• [13]Diehl AK, Kumar V, Gateley A, Appleby JL, O’Keefe ME: Predictors of final specialty choice by internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21(10):1045-1049.
• [14]Horn L, Tzanetos K, Thorpe K, Straus SE: Factors associated with the subspecialty choices of internal medicine residents in Canada. BMC Med Educ 2008, 8:37. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]McDonald FS, West CP, Popkave C, Kolars JC: Educational debt and reported career plans among internal medicine residents. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149(6):416-420.
• [16]West CP, Drefahl MM, Popkave C, Kolars JC: Internal medicine resident self-report of factors associated with career decisions. J Gen Intern Med 2009, 24(8):946-949.
• [17]Katz SJ, Yacyshyn EA: Attracting internal medicine trainees to rheumatology: where and when programs should focus efforts. J Rheumatol 2009, 36(12):2802-2805.
• [18]Ofoma UR, Lehman EE, Haidet P, Yacht A: Associations between subspecialty fellowship interest and knowledge of internal medicine: a hypothesis-generating study of internal medicine residents. BMC Med Educ 2011, 11:5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Daniels VJ, Kassam N: Determinants of internal medicine residents’ choice in the Canadian R4 fellowship match: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 2011, 11:44. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Horn L, Koehler E, Gilbert J, Johnson DH: Factors associated with the career choices of hematology and medical oncology fellows trained at academic institutions in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29:3932-3938.
• [21]Watson P, Gaffney K: Factors influencing recruitment to rheumatology. Clin Med 2011, 11(5):509-510.
• [22]Brown SR: Q methodology and qualitative research. Qual Health Res 1996, 6:561-567.
• [23]Cross RM: Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Educ Res 2005, 20(2):206-213.
• [24]PQMethod 2.11 Available at http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/downpqwin.htm webcite. Accessed July 31, 2010
• [25]McKeown B, Thomas D: Q methodology. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no. 07–066. The international professional publishers. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1988.
• [26]Van Exel N, Job A, de Graaf G: Q methodology: a sneak preview. 2005. Available from http://qmethod.org/tutoriallinks.php webcite. Accessed May 5, 2010
• [27]IBM Corp: Released: IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2012.
• [28]Ebell MH: Future salary and US residency fill rate revisited. JAMA 2008, 300(10):1131-1132.
• [29]Ghali WA, Greenberg PB, Mejia R, Otaki J, Cornuz J: International perspectives on general internal medicine and the case for “globalization” of a discipline. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21(2):197-200.
• [30]McAlister FA: Why general internal medicine. CJGIM 2010, 5(1):5.