期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Physiological relevance and performance of a minimal lung model – an experimental study in healthy and acute respiratory distress syndrome model piglets
Thomas Desaive2  Geoffrey M Shaw5  Knut Moeller1  Christoph Schranz1  Nathalie Janssen3  Bernard Lambermont4  J Geoffrey Chase6  Yeong Shiong Chiew6 
[1] Institute for Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany;Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Institute of Physics, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium;Emergency Department, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium;Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium;Department of Intensive Care, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand;Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词: Mechanical ventilation;    Animal trials;    Recruitment model;    ARDS;   
Others  :  1136350
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2466-12-59
 received in 2012-06-26, accepted in 2012-09-19,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the primary form of support for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, intra- and inter- patient-variability reduce the efficacy of general protocols. Model-based approaches to guide MV can be patient-specific. A physiological relevant minimal model and its patient-specific performance are tested to see if it meets this objective above.

Methods

Healthy anesthetized piglets weighing 24.0 kg [IQR: 21.0-29.6] underwent a step-wise PEEP increase manoeuvre from 5cmH2O to 20cmH2O. They were ventilated under volume control using Engström Care Station (Datex, General Electric, Finland), with pressure, flow and volume profiles recorded. ARDS was then induced using oleic acid. The data were analyzed with a Minimal Model that identifies patient-specific mean threshold opening and closing pressure (TOP and TCP), and standard deviation (SD) of these TOP and TCP distributions. The trial and use of data were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Liege, Belgium.

Results and discussions

3 of the 9 healthy piglets developed ARDS, and these data sets were included in this study. Model fitting error during inflation and deflation, in healthy or ARDS state is less than 5.0% across all subjects, indicating that the model captures the fundamental lung mechanics during PEEP increase. Mean TOP was 42.4cmH2O [IQR: 38.2-44.6] at PEEP = 5cmH2O and decreased with PEEP to 25.0cmH2O [IQR: 21.5-27.1] at PEEP = 20cmH2O. In contrast, TCP sees a reverse trend, increasing from 10.2cmH2O [IQR: 9.0-10.4] to 19.5cmH2O [IQR: 19.0-19.7]. Mean TOP increased from average 21.2-37.4cmH2O to 30.4-55.2cmH2O between healthy and ARDS subjects, reflecting the higher pressure required to recruit collapsed alveoli. Mean TCP was effectively unchanged.

Conclusion

The minimal model is capable of capturing physiologically relevant TOP, TCP and SD of both healthy and ARDS lungs. The model is able to track disease progression and the response to treatment.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Chiew et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150312054015403.pdf 1493KB PDF download
Figure 8. 31KB Image download
Figure 7. 43KB Image download
Figure 6. 60KB Image download
Figure 5. 24KB Image download
Figure 4. 30KB Image download
Figure 3. 30KB Image download
Figure 2. 47KB Image download
Figure 1. 88KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Rees S, Allerød C, Murley D, Zhao Y, Smith B, Kjærgaard S, Thorgaard P, Andreassen S: Using physiological models and decision theory for selecting appropriate ventilator settings. J Clin Monit Comput 2006, 20(6):421-429.
  • [2]Schranz C, Kno X, Bel C, Kretschmer J, Zhao Z, Mo , ller K: Hierarchical Parameter Identification in Models of Respiratory Mechanics. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions 2011, 58(11):3234-3241.
  • [3]Chase JG, Le Compte A, Preiser J-C, Shaw G, Penning S, Desaive T: Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? Annals of Intensive Care 2011, 1:11. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [4]Ashbaugh D, Boyd Bigelow D, Petty T, Levine B: ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS IN ADULTS. Lancet 1967, 290(7511):319-323.
  • [5]The ADTF: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The berlin definition. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2012, 307(23):2526-2533.
  • [6]Hickling Keith G: The Pressure-Volume Curve Is Greatly Modified by Recruitment . A Mathematical Model of ARDS Lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 158(1):194-202.
  • [7]Crotti S, Mascheroni D, Caironi P, Pelosi P, Ronzoni G, Mondino M, Marini JJ, Gattinoni L: Recruitment and Derecruitment during Acute Respiratory Failure . A Clinical Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 164(1):131-140.
  • [8]Pelosi P, Goldner M, McKibben A, Adams A, Eccher G, Caironi P, Losappio S, Gattinoni L, Marini JJ: Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: an experimental study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 164:122-130.
  • [9]Sundaresan A, Chase J, Shaw G, Chiew YS, Desaive T: Model-based optimal PEEP in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients in the Intensive Care Unit. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2011, 10(1):64. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [10]Sundaresan A, Yuta T, Hann CE, Geoffrey Chase J, Shaw GM: A minimal model of lung mechanics and model-based markers for optimizing ventilator treatment in ARDS patients. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2009, 95(2):166-180.
  • [11]Pulletz S, Adler A, Kott M, Elke G, Gawelczyk B, Schädler D, Zick G, Weiler N, Frerichs I: Regional lung opening and closing pressures in patients with acute lung injury. J Crit Care 2012, 27(3):323.e311-323.e318.
  • [12]Tusman G, Böhm SH, de Anda GF V, Do Campo JL, Lachmann B: Alveolar recruitment strategy' improves arterial oxygenation during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1999, 82(1):8-13.
  • [13]Tusman G, Böhm SH, Warner DO, Sprung J: Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 2012, 25(1):1-10.
  • [14]Rusca M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Hedenstierna G, Spahn DR, Magnusson L: Prevention of Atelectasis Formation During Induction of General Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003, 97(6):1835-1839.
  • [15]Schuster D: ARDS: clinical lessons from the oleic acid model of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149(1):245-260.
  • [16]Ballard-Croft C, Wang D, Sumpter LR, Zhou X, Zwischenberger JB: Large-Animal Models of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2012, 93(4):1331-1339.
  • [17]Ware LB: Modeling human lung disease in animals. American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 2008, 294(2):L149-L150.
  • [18]Bastarache JA, Blackwell TS: Development of animal models for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Disease Models & Mechanisms 2009, 2(5–6):218-223.
  • [19]Takeuchi M, Imanaka H, Tachibana K, Ogino H, Ando M, Nishimura M: Recruitment maneuver and high positive end-expiratory pressure improve hypoxemia in patients after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic pulmonary thromboembolism *. Crit Care Med 2005, 33(9):2010-2014. 2010.1097/2001.CCM.0000178174.0000153373.DA
  • [20]Spieth P, Gama De Abreu M: Lung recruitment in ARDS: We are still confused, but on a higher PEEP level. Crit Care 2012, 16(1):108. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [21]Varpula T, Valta P, Niemi R, Takkunen O, Hynynen M, Pettilä V: Airway pressure release ventilation as a primary ventilatory mode in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004, 48(6):722-731.
  • [22]Barbas CSV, de Matos GFJ, Pincelli MP, da Rosa Borges E, Antunes T, de Barros JM, Okamoto V, Borges JB, Amato MBP, de Carvalho CR R: Mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure: recruitment and high positive end-expiratory pressure are necessary. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005, 11(1):18-28.
  • [23]Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, Matthay MA, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT: Higher versus Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressures in Patients with the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004, 351(4):327-336.
  • [24]Julien M, Hoeffel JM, Flick MR: Oleic acid lung injury in sheep. J Appl Physiol 1986, 60(2):433-440.
  • [25]Grotjohan HP, van der Heijde RMJL, Jansen JRC, Wagenvoort CA, Versprille A: A stable model of respiratory distress by small injections of oleic acid in pigs. Intensive Care Med 1996, 22(4):336-344.
  • [26]Rosenthal C, Caronia C, Quinn C, Lugo N, Sagy M: A comparison among animal models of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 1998, 26(5):912-916.
  • [27]Lu Q, Malbouisson LM, Mourgeon E, Goldstein I, Coriat P, Rouby JJ: Assessment of PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions in acute lung injury: are one or three CT sections representative of the entire lung? Intensive Care Med 2001, 27(9):1504-1510.
  • [28]The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000, 342(18):1301-1308.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:44次 浏览次数:9次