Development and qualitative evaluation of an adapted return to work guideline for the sick-listed unemployed and temporary agency workers with minor psychological problems

BMC Research Notes

Monique HW Frings-Dresen¹  Judith K Sluiter¹  Karen Nieuwenhuijsen¹  Jan L Hoving¹  Selwin S Audhoe¹ 

[1] Academic Medical Center, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health/Research Center for Insurance Medicine, University of Amsterdam, PO BOX 22700, Amsterdam 1100 DE, The Netherlands

关键词: Minor psychological problems;    Guideline;    Counselling;    Vocational rehabilitation;    Return-to-work;    Participation;    Unemployment;   

Others  :  1165577
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-0500-5-535

 received in 2012-03-15, accepted in 2012-09-22,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Among the working population, unemployed and temporary agency workers with psychological problems are a particularly vulnerable group, at risk for sickness absence and prolonged work disability. There is a need for the development of a new protocol for this group, because the existing return to work (RTW) interventions, including practice guidelines, do not address the situation when there is no workplace to return to. The purpose of this study was to (1) describe the adaptations needed in the practice guideline for employed workers to enable its use by insurance physicians (IPs) for counselling of sick-listed unemployed and temporary agency workers with minor psychological problems; and (2) evaluate the experiences of IPs when using the new guidance document for minor psychological problems (MPP guidance document).

Methods

The MPP guidance document for unemployed and temporary agency workers was developed through discussions with nine IPs and with the help of an expert. Semi-structured interviews with five IPs were then held to evaluate the IPs’ field experience using the MPP guidance document, in terms of (a) feasibility and (b) perceived usefulness of the MPP guidance document.

Results

The main adaptation introduced in the guideline is that interaction with the workplace, which is absent in this population, needed to be established in an alternative way, i.e., through the involvement of vocational rehabilitation agencies and labour experts. Overall, the guideline required minimal changes. In total, nineteen sick-listed workers were counselled using the MPP guidance document. The overall experience of the IPs was that the MPP guidance document was feasible and useful for the IP, while they had mixed responses on its usefulness for the sick-listed worker, in part due to the follow-up period of this study.

Conclusions

An existing practice guideline for employed workers was adapted for use as a guidance document for unemployed and temporary agency workers with minor psychological problems. IPs were positive about applying the MPP guidance document. The guidance document provides opportunities for RTW counselling for unemployed and temporary agency workers with minor psychological problems.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Audhoe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Sheikh K, Mattingly S: Long-term disability and return to work. J R Coll Gen Pract 1981, 31:670-673.
• [2]Marnetoft S, Selander J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J: Factors associated with successful vocational rehabilitation in a Swedish rural area. J Rehab Med 2001, 33:71-78.
• [3]Cornelius LR, van der Klink JJL, Groothof JW, Brouwer S: Prognostic factors of long term disability due to mental disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2011, 21:259-274.
• [4]Benach J, Amable M, Muntander C, Benavides FG: The consequences of flexible work for health: are we looking at the right place? J Epidemiol Community Health 2002, 56:405-406.
• [5]Benach J, Muntander C: Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 61:276-277.
• [6]Quinlan M, Mayhew C, Bohle P: The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: a review of recent research. Int J Health Serv 2001, 31:335-414.
• [7]Ensminger ME, Celentano DD: Unemployment and psychiatric distress: social resources and coping. Soc Sci Med 1988, 27(3):239-247.
• [8]Lindström M: Psychosocial work conditions, unemployment and self-reported psychological health: a population-based study. Occup Med 2005, 55:568-571.
• [9]Brown DW, Balluz LS, Ford ES, Giles WH, Strine TW, Moriarty DG, Croft JB, Mokdad AH: Associations between short- and long term unemployment and frequent mental distress among a national sample of men and women. J Occup Environ Med 2003, 45(11):1159-1166.
• [10]Theodossiou I: The effects of low-pay and unemployment on psychological well-being: a logistic regression approach. J Health Econ 1998, 17(1):85-104.
• [11]UWV: Dutch Institute for Employee Benefit Schemes. Kennisverslag 2011-III, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2011. [in Dutch]
• [12]De Jong P, Schrijvershof C, Veerman T: Unemployed and flex workers in profile. Comparison between nine months sick-listed unemployed and flex workers and employees [Vangnetters en profil. Vergelijking tussen negen maanden zieke vangnetters en werknemers]. APE/AStri, The Netherlands; 2008. [in Dutch]
• [13]Ybema JF, Evers M, Lagerveld S, van den Berg R, van Vuren T: Report working improved gatekeeper law among non-employees: First cohort, repeated research first cohort and second cohort [Rapport werking Wet verbetering poortwachter onder vangnetters: Eerste cohort, herhaalonderzoek eerste cohort en tweede cohort]. TNO, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; 2006. [in Dutch]
• [14]Audhoe SS, Hoving JL, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW: Vocational interventions for unemployed: effects on work participation and mental distress. A systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2010, 20(1):1-13.
• [15]van der Klink JJL, van Dijk FJH: Dutch practice guidelines for managing adjustment disorders in occupational and primary health care. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003, 29:478-487.
• [16]van der Klink J, NVAB: Guideline for Mental Health Problems. NVAB [Dutch Association of Occupational Physicians], Eindhoven; 2000.
• [17]van der Klink JJL, Ausems CMM, Beijderwellen BD, Blonk R, Bruinvels DJ, Dogger J, Hoedeman R, Janssen J, Loo M, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Oeij TS, van Rees E, van Rhenen W, de Roos L: Guideline for Mental Health Problems. NVAB [Dutch Association of Occupational Physicians], Utrecht; 2007. [in Dutch]
• [18]van der Klink JJL, Blonk RWB, Schene AH, van Dijk FJ: Reducing long term sickness absence by an activating intervention in adjustment disorders: a cluster randomized controlled design. Occup Environ Med 2003, 60:429-437.
• [19]Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, Siemerink JCMJ, Tummers-Nijsen D: Quality of rehabilitation among workers with adjustment disorders according to practice guidelines: a retrospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2003, 60:21-25.
• [20]Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, Blonk RW, van Dijk FJ: Validation of performance indicators for Rehabilitation of workers with mental health problems. Med Care 2005, 43:1034-1042.
• [21]Audhoe SS, Hoving JL, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Friperson R, de Jong PR, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW: Prognostic factors for the work participation of sick-listed unemployed and temporary agency workers with psychological problems. J Occup Rehabil 2012.
• [22]Terluin B: The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in general practice. psycho-diagnostic tool’ [‘De Vierdimensionale Klachtenlijst (4DKL) in de huisartspraktijk. Psychodiagnostisch gereedschap]. De Psycholoog 1998, 33:18-24. [in Dutch]
• [23]Terluin B, van Rhenen W, Schaufeli W, de Haan M: The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): measuring distress and other mental health problems in a working population. Work & Stress 2004, 18(3):187-207.
• [24]American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). APA, Washington, DC; 1994.
• [25]Horsburgh D: Evaluation of qualitative research. J Clin Nurs 2003, 12:307-312.
• [26]Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, Schellart AJM, Knol DL, van Mechelen W, van der Beek AJ: A participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 2011, 21(3):313-324.
• [27]Department of Health: Choosing health: making healthier choices easier. Public Health White Paper, London; 2004. DH
• [28]Zampolini M, Bernardinello M, Lesio L: RTW in back conditions. Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29:1377-1385.
• [29]Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnoud L, Corbière M: How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability? J Ocupp Rehabil 2008, 18:207-217.