Development and impact of the Iranian hospital performance measurement program

BMC Health Services Research

Niek S Klazinga²  Aidin Aryankhesal¹  Jila Manoochehri³  Dionne S Kringos²  Asgar Aghaei Hashjin¹ 

[1] Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center (AMC)/University of Amsterdam, Postbox: 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Quality Improvement, Tehran Heart Center Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

关键词: Iran;    Quality improvement;    Quality assurance;    External evaluation;    Accreditation;    Performance measurement;    Hospital performance;   

Others  :  1126073
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-448

 received in 2014-02-18, accepted in 2014-09-23,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Iran developed a national hospital performance measurement program (HPMP) which has been implemented annually throughout its hospitals since 1997. However, little is known yet about its development and the impact of the program on hospital performance.

This study aims to describe the development and process of implementation of the HPMP, and to explore the impact on hospital performance by looking at the trends of performance scores of all different types of Iranian hospitals.

Methods

This was a mixed method study consisting of longitudinal data and qualitative document analysis. Hospital performance data over the period of 2002 to 2008 was analysed.

Results

Iran instituted a comprehensive HPMP and implemented it in all hospitals since 1997. The program followed a phased development to stimulate performance and quality improvement in hospitals. Overall, the program has had a positive impact on the performance of general and specialized hospitals. The performance of general hospitals did not appear to be associated with their size or affiliated university ranking. However, the rate of performance improvement of general teaching and private hospitals was significantly lower than the average improvement rate of all general hospitals. There was no relationship between teaching status of the specialized hospitals and their level of performance. However, the performance of the governmental specialized hospitals showed a substantial decline over time. Moreover, among specialized hospitals, the bigger sized and those affiliated with higher ranked universities, reported better performance.

Conclusions

Overall, the development and implementation of an obligatory HPMP in Iran has improved the level of performance in general and specialized hospitals. However, there is room for further performance improvement especially in the general teaching, private, and governmental specialized hospitals. Reconsidering the ownership type, funding mechanisms and responsibility for the HPMP may have an impact on the absolute level of performance and improvement capacity of hospitals. In addition, the role and composition of survey teams, mechanism of implementation according to the characteristics of hospitals, and updating standards are important factors to promote performance improvement and hospital accreditation requirements.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Aghaei Hashjin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Greenfield D, Braithwaite J: Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care Advance 2008, 20(3):172-183.
• [2]Rooney AL, van Ostenberg PR: Licensure, Accreditation, and Certification: Approaches to Health Services Quality. USA: Center for Human Services (CHS), Quality Assurance Project; 1999. [Quality Assurance Methodology Refinement Series]
• [3]Shih A, Schoenbaum SC: Measuring Hospital Performance: The Importance of Process Measures. 2007. [Data brief, The Commonwealth Fund]
• [4]Shaw C: How Can Hospital Performance Be Measured and Monitored? In Health Evidence Network report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2003.
• [5]Nutley S, Smith PC: League tables for performance improvement in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy 1998, 3:50-57.
• [6]Performance Measurement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_measurement webcite, accessed 07-12-2013
• [7]Soeters R, Habineza C, Peerenboom PB: Performance-based financing and changing the district health system: experience from Rwanda. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84:884-889.
• [8]Eichler R, Auxila P, Antoine U, Desmangles B: Performance-Based Incentives For Health: Six Years Of Results From Supply-Side Programs In Haiti. In CGD Working Paper #121. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development; 2007.
• [9]Sondorp E, Palmer N, Strong L, Wali A: Afghanistan: Paying NGOs for performance in a postconflict setting. In Performance Incentives for Global Health: Potential and Pitfalls. Edited by The Performance-Based Incentives Working Group, Eichler R, Levine R. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development; 2009.
• [10]Toonen J, Canavan A, Vergeer P, Elovainio R: Performance-based Financing for Health: Lessons from Sub-Saharan Africa. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute. Cordaid and the World Health Organization; 2009.
• [11]Basinga P, Gertler P, Binagwaho A, Soucat LBA, Sturdy J, Vermeersch MJC: Effect on maternal and child health services in Rwanda of payment to primary health-care providers for performance: an impact evaluation. Lancet 2011, 377:1421-1428.
• [12]The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education: Standards And Principles Of Evaluation Of The General Hospitals. 1997. [The instruction (in Farsi)]
• [13]World Health Organization Hospital Advisory Group: A Review of the Determinants of Hospital Performance. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. District Health Systems Unit; 1994.
• [14]Healy J, McKee M: The role and function of hospitals. In Hospitals in a Changing Europe. Edited by McKee M, Healy J. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2002.
• [15]Onyebuchi A, Arah TC, Klazinga NS: Updating the Key Dimensions of Hospital Performance: The Move Towards a Theoretical Framework. Barcelona: Third Workshop on Hospital Performance Measurement; 2003.
• [16]Ovretveit J: Quality evaluation and indicator comparison in health care. Int J Health Plann Manage 2001, 16(3):229-241.
• [17]The National Committee for Quality Health Care (NCQHC), CEO Survival Guide Pay for Performance2006 Edition, http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/HospitalCEOGuidetoP4P.pdf webcite, accessed 10 September 2012
• [18]Shaw CD: Developing Hospital Accreditation In Europe. Copenhagen Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe, Division of Country Support; 2004.
• [19]Nicholas D: Using Accreditation to Improve Quality. The quality assurance project’s information outlet,. 1999.
• [20]Aryankhesal A, Sheldon TA, Mannion R: Role of pay-for-performance in a hospital performance measurement system: a multiple case study in Iran. Health Policy Plan 2013, 28(2):206-214. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs055
• [21]Stockard J, Tusler M: Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff 2003, 22(2):84-94.
• [22]World Health Organization: Health Systems: Improving Performance. In The World Health Report. Geneva: Bulletin of the World Health Organization; 2000.
• [23]Rau J: Medicare Discloses Hospitals’ Bonus, Penalties Based On Quality. 2012. http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2012/December/21/medicare-hospitals-value-based-purchasing.aspx?goback=%2Egmp_83749%2Egde_83749_member_199766202 webcite, accessed 07-01-2013
• [24]Aryankhesal A: The Iranian Hospital Grading System And Its Influence On Stakeholders’ Behaviour. York: The university of York; 2010. [PhD thesis]
• [25]The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education: Practical Instruction To Quality Evaluation In Hospitals (In Farsi). 2002.
• [26]Tabriz Medical University: Hospitals’ Evaluation Department. http://treatment.tbzmed.ac.ir/?MID=21&Type=News&TypeID=2&ID=16 webcite, accessed 20-01-2014
• [27]Shiraz Medical University: Hospitals’ Evaluation Department. http://www.sums.ac.ir/ webcite, accessed 15-12-2013
• [28]The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education: Hospitals Performance Grading Results. 2008.
• [29]The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education: The Graphs Of The General Hospitals Grading Based On Acquired Scores In Annual Evaluation (2007-2008). 2009.
• [30]The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education: The Trend of Changing General Hospitals’ Grades From 2005 To 2008. 2009.
• [31]Mehr New Agency: The Results of Medical Universities Grading. 2010. http://www.mehrnews.com/fa/newsdetail.aspx?newsID=1408888 webcite, accessed 16-11-2012
• [32]MOHME: The Instruction of Standards and Principles of Evaluation of The General Hospitals (in Farsi). Tehran: The Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 1997.
• [33]The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education: Charges For The Diagnostic And Treatment Services (In Farsi), 2009 – 2010. 2009. available at: http://treatment.tbzmed.ac.ir/uploads/30/CMS/user/file/47/tarafe/tarefeglo88.pdf webcite, accessed 20-01-2014
• [34]Gyani GJ: Hospital Accreditation in India - Standardising healthcare. Asian Hosp Healthcare Manag 2012., (22) From Asian Hospital & Healthcare Management, http://www.asianhhm.com/knowledge_bank/articles/healthcare_accreditations_india.htm webcite, accessed 7 May 2012.
• [35]The Health Ministry of Malaysia: Malaysian Government Considers Mandatory Accreditation For Hospital Licenses, Patient Safety Monitor: Global Edition. 2008. http://www.hcpro.com/QPS-225413-5482/Malaysian-government-considers-mandatory-accreditation-for-hospital-licenses.html webcite, accessed 18-04-2012
• [36]Kiadaliri AA, Jafari M, Gerdtham U-G: Frontier-based techniques in measuring hospital efficiency in Iran: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2013, 13:312. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-312 BioMed Central Full Text
• [37]Aghaei Hashjin A, Ravaghi H, Kringos DS, Ogbu UC, Fischer C, Azami SR, Klazinga NS: Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff. PLoS One 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086014
• [38]Aryankhesal A, Sheldon TA, Mannion R: Impact of the Iranian hospital grading system on hospitals’ adherence to audited standards: An examination of possible mechanisms. Health Policy 2014, 115(2):206-214. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.004
• [39]Aryankhesal A, Sheldon T: Effect of the Iranian hospital grading system on patients’ and general practitioners’ behaviour: an examination of awareness, belief and choice. Health Serv Manage Res 2010, 23(3):139-144. doi:10.1258/hsmr.2009.009028
• [40]Shaw CD, European Foundation for Quality Management. International Organization for Standardization: External quality mechanisms for health care: summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries. External peer review techniques. Int J Qual Health Care 2000, 12(3):169-175. PubMed Abstract Publisher Full Text
• [41]Aghaei Hashjin A, Delgoshaei B, Kringos DS, Tabibi SJ, Manoochehri J, Klazinga NS: Implementation of hospital quality assurance policies in Iran: Balancing the role of licensing, annual evaluation, inspections and quality management systems. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2014. forthcoming
• [42]Hendrikse I: The Dutch Healthcare Accreditation System. In The Netherlands Institute for Accreditation in Healthcare (NIAZ). Prague: Utrecht; 2009.
• [43]Ginsberg C, Sheridan S, Ginsberg C, Sheridan S: Limitations of and barriers to using performance measurement: purchasers’ perspectives. Health Care Finance Rev 2001., 22(3) available from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-79053740.html# webcite, accessed 12 June 2012