How 2 txt: an exploration of crafting public health messages in SMS

BMC Research Notes

Janet Baseman²  Malaika R Schwartz²  Debra Revere¹ 

[1] Northwest Center for Public Health Practice, School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th St, Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 357236, Seattle, WA 98195-7236, USA

关键词: Text messaging;    SMS;    Short message service;    Public health;    Health care providers;    Emergency preparedness and response;    Communications;   

Others  :  1130562
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-0500-7-514

 received in 2014-04-24, accepted in 2014-07-30,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Health care providers are an important target audience for public health emergency preparedness, response and recovery communications. Short Message Service or text messaging to cell phones may be a promising supplemental or alternative technique for reaching health care providers with time-sensitive public health information. However, studies to date have yet to investigate the message content and formatting requirements of providers with respect to public health alerts and advisories or sought to understand how to meet these needs using Short Message Service technology.

Methods

Data collection was completed using a two-part online survey. In the first part, health care providers identified their use of different technologies for receiving information and provided input on the message components most important in a public health message. In the second part, health care providers participated in an exercise in which they shortened three public health emergency messages, ranging from 2024–2828 characters per message, to meet the 160-character limitation for text delivery. Results were analyzed to determine associations between provider types, age ranges, gender, access to various media (text, email, fax, social media, etc.), and smart phone ownership.

Results

The following components were most frequently selected as essential for a public health message: Topic, Recommendation, Geographic Location, Signs & Symptoms, Population Affected, and Link to Additional Information. There was no statistically significant association between message component selection and provider type, age ranges, or gender. In the message conversion exercise, we found a statistically significant association between providers who reported receiving information by SMS and/or smart phone ownership and including a link to additional information in the converted message, ranging from 61% to over 72% on a per message analysis.

Conclusions

A substantive recommendation derived from this study is that public health agencies include a link to additional website information when sending messages in SMS format. SMS could be a useful public health tool for communicating with health care providers but further investigation of how to effectively use SMS and other mobile technologies is needed to inform public health decisions regarding adoption of messaging systems utilizing these newer technologies.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Revere et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Revere D, Painter I, Baseman J: Traditional and mobile public health alert communications with health care providers. Online J Public Health Inform [Online] 2013, 5:e124. [Publisher Full Text: ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/ojphi/article/view/4439/3486]
• [2]Revere D, Nelson K, Thiede H, Stergachis A, Duchin J, Baseman J: Public health emergency preparedness and response communications with health care providers: a literature review. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:337. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21592390 webcite] [Publisher Full Text: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-11-337.pdf webcite] BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Carroll A, Marrero D, Downs S: The HealthPia GlucoPack Diabetes phone: a usability study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2007, 9:158-64. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17425441 webcite]
• [4]Wang D, Kogashiwa M, Kira S: Development of a new instrument for evaluating individuals' dietary intakes. J Am Diet Assoc 2006, 106:1588-93. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17000191 webcite]
• [5]Weitzel JA, Bernhardt JM, Usdan S, Mays D, Glanz K: Using wireless handheld computers and tailored text messaging to reduce negative consequences of drinking alcohol. J Alcohol Drugs 2007, 68:534-37. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17568957 webcite]
• [6]Rodgers A, Corbett T, Bramley D, Riddell T, Wills M, Lin RB, Jones M: Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging. Tob Control 2005, 14:255-61. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16046689 webcite] [Publisher Full Text: tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/14/4/255.full.pdf]
• [7]Catalyst Web Q Seattle WA: University of Washington; 2013. [Online: http://www.washington.edu/itconnect/learn/tools/catalyst-web-tools/webq/about-webq/ webcite]
• [8]Smith A: 56% of American Adults are Now Smartphone Owners. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2013. [Online: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Smartphone_adoption_2013_PDF.pdf webcite]
• [9]Nilsen W, Kumar S, Shar A, Varoquiers C, Wiley T, Riley WT, Pavel M, Atienza AA: Advancing the science of mHealth. J Health Commun 2012, 17:5-10. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22548593 webcite]
• [10]Klasnja P, Pratt W: Healthcare in the pocket: mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform 2012, 45:184-98. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pubmed/21925288 webcite] [Publisher Full Text: http://www.j-biomed-inform.com/article/S1532-0464%2811%2900144-4/pdf webcite]
• [11]Wray RJ, Kreuter MW, Jacobsen H, Clements B, Evans RG: Theoretical perspectives on public communication preparedness for terrorist attacks. Fam Community Health 2004, 27:232-41. [PubMed Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15596970 webcite]
• [12]Donahue AK, Tuohy RV: Lessons we don't learn: a study of the lessons of disasters, why we repeat them, and how we can learn from them. Homeland Secur Aff 2006, 2:1-28.
• [13]TOPOFF 4 Full-Scale Exercise: After Action Quick Look Report and TOPOFF 4 Full-Scale Exercise: October 15–17, 2007. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security & FEMA; 2008. [Online: training.fema.gov/EMIweb/edu/docs/TopOff4_afteraction_report2007.pdf]
• [14]CTIA: Texting Loved Ones During an Emergency: Wireless Quick Facts. Washington DC: CTIA Consumer Info, CTIA—The Wireless Association; 2011.
• [15]Reynolds B: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication Training Program; 2002. [Online: http://www.bt.cdc.gov/cerc/training/basic/index.asp webcite]