A qualitative exploration of discharge destination as an outcome or a driver of acute stroke care

BMC Health Services Research

Ian Edwards¹  Karen A Grimmer¹  Julie Bernhardt²  Julie A Luker² 

[1]International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, 5000 Adelaide, South Australia

[2]Florey Institute of Neurosciences & Mental Health, University of Melbourne, NHMRC Research Fellow, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

关键词: Allied health professionals;    Health care disparities;    Evidence-based practice;    Decision making;    Stroke;    Quality of care;   

Others  :  1132637
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-193

 received in 2013-12-09, accepted in 2014-04-16,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Many patients with acute stroke do not receive recommended care in tertiary hospital settings. Allied health professionals have important roles within multidisciplinary stroke teams and influence the quality of care patients receive. Studies examining the role of allied health professionals in acute stroke management are scarce, and very little is known about the clinical decision making of these stroke clinicians. In this study we aimed to describe factors that influence the complex clinical decision making of these professionals as they prioritise acute stroke patients for recommended care. This qualitative study was part of a larger mixed methods study.

Methods

The qualitative methodology applied was a constructivist grounded theory approach.

Fifteen allied health professionals working with acute stroke patients at three metropolitan tertiary care hospitals in South Australia were purposively sampled.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted face to face using a question guide, and digital recording. Interviews were transcribed and analysed by two researchers using rigorous grounded theory processes.

Results

Our analysis highlighted ‘predicted discharge destination’ as a powerful driver of care decisions and clinical prioritisation for this professional group. We found that complex clinical decision making to predict discharge destination required professionals to concurrently consider patient’s pre-stroke status, the nature and severity of their stroke, the course of their recovery and multiple factors from within the healthcare system. The consequences of these decisions had potentially profound consequences for patients and sometimes led to professionals experiencing considerable uncertainty and stress.

Conclusions

Our qualitative enquiry provided new insights into the way allied health professionals make important clinical decisions for patients with acute stroke. This is the first known study to demonstrate that the subjective prediction of discharge destination made early in an acute admission by allied health professionals, has a powerful influence over the care and rehabilitation provided, and the ultimate outcomes for stroke patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Luker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]National Stroke Foundation: National Stroke Audit - Acute Services Clinical Audit Report 2011. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2011.
• [2]Luker JA, Bernhardt J, Grimmer-Somers KA: Demographic and stroke-related factors as predictors of quality of acute stroke care provided by allied health professionals. J Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2011, 4:247-259.
• [3]Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration: Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007., (4) Art. No. CD000197. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub2
• [4]National Stroke Foundation: Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2010. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2010.
• [5]Bhalla A, Grieve R, Tilling K, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD, Biomed II European Study of Stroke: Older stroke patients in Europe: stroke care and determinants of outcome. Age & Ageing 2004, 33(6):618-624.
• [6]McKevitt C, Coshall C, Tilling K, Wolfe C: Are there inequalities in the provision of stroke care? Analysis of an inner-city stroke register. Stroke 2005, 36(2):315-320.
• [7]Palnum KD, Petersen P, Sorensen HT, Ingeman A, Mainz J, Bartels P, Johnsen SP: Older patients with acute stroke in Denmark: quality of care and short-term mortality. A nationwide follow-up study. Age & Ageing 2008, 37(1):90-95.
• [8]Rudd AG, Hoffman A, Down C, Pearson M, Lowe D: Access to stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the effect of age, gender and weekend admission. Age & Ageing 2007, 36(3):247-255.
• [9]Luker JA, Bernhardt J, Grimmer-Somers KA: Age and gender as predictors of allied health quality stroke care. J Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2011, 4:239-245.
• [10]Rice P, Ezzy D: Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press; 1999.
• [11]McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C: Qualitative studies of stroke: A systematic review. Stroke 2004, 35(6):1499-1505.
• [12]Clarke P: Understanding the experience of stroke: a mixed-method research agenda. Gerontologist 2009, 49:293-302.
• [13]Luker JA: The Influence of Acute Stroke patients’ age on the Quality of Care They Receive from Allied Health Professionals. University of South Australia, International Centre for Allied Health Evidence: PhD Thesis; 2012. http://itupl-ura1.ml.unisa.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=98956 webcite
• [14]Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL: Designing and Conducting Mixed methods Research. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: California, SAGE Publications; 2011.
• [15]Charmaz K: Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; 2009.
• [16]Luker JA, Wall K, Bernhardt J, Edwards I, Grimmer-Somers KA: Patients’ age as a determinant of care received following acute stroke: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:161. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Stake RE: Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York & London: Guilford Press; 2006.
• [18]Ezzy D: Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Allen & Unwin: Crows Nest NSW; 2002.
• [19]NVivo licenced by QRS International: NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software. QRS International Pty Ltd. Version 8; 2009. http://www.qsrinternational.com/ webcite
• [20]Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research. London UK: Sage; 1990.
• [21]Novak JD, Canas AJ: Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education 2007, 3(1):29-42.
• [22]Stewart M: Joined up thinking? Evaluating the use of concept-mapping to develop complex system learning. Assess Eval High Educ 2011, 37:349-368.
• [23]Glaser B, Strauss A: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Adline; 1967.
• [24]Flannery Wainwright S, Shepard K, Harman L, Stephens J: Factors that influence the clinical decision making of novice and experienced physical therapists. Phys Ther 2011, 91(1):87-101.
• [25]Holloway RG, Benesch CG, Burgin WS, Zentner JB: Prognosis and decision making in severe stroke. JAMA 2005, 294(6):725-733.
• [26]Wyller TB: Rehabilitation after severe stroke - an enthusiastic approval and a cautionary note. Disabil Rehabil 2000, 22(4):193-195.
• [27]Unsworth CA, Thomas SA: External validation of a housing recommendation model for clients following stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25(21):1208-1218.