Physical education or playtime: which is more effective at promoting physical activity in primary school children?

BMC Research Notes

Katie Hall¹  Carly Wood¹ 

[1] School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, UK

关键词: Team games;    Physical education;    Playtime;    Physical activity;   

Others  :  1090609
DOI  :  10.1186/s13104-015-0979-1

 received in 2015-01-09, accepted in 2015-01-12,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

School physical education (PE) and playtime provide important opportunities for physical activity (PA). However, little research has assessed PA during primary school PE using accelerometry or compared PA during different lesson types. There is also a lack of research comparing PA during PE and playtime, despite suggestions that playtime promotes more PA. The primary aim of this study was to determine which types of PE lesson are most facilitative of PA. The secondary aim was to determine whether children are more active during PE or playtime.

Methods

Descriptive and fitness data were assessed in 20 children aged 8-9years from a single school. Over eight consecutive weeks PA was assessed during PE lessons, which were classified as either team games or movement activities. At the mid-week of data collection playtime PA was also assessed. PA was assessed using accelerometry and the percentage of time spent in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) calculated. Paired t-tests were used to compare MVPA during movement lessons and team games lessons and during PE and playtime.

Results

Children spent 9.5% of PE lessons in MVPA and engaged in significantly more MVPA during team games (P < 0.001). MVPA was also significantly higher during PE than playtime (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Children do not engage in sufficient PA during PE, but are most active during team games lessons; whilst PA during playtime is lower than PE. Interventions to increase PA during both PE and playtime are therefore required. PE interventions should target games lessons as they dominate the curriculum, encourage most PA and present the greatest potential for change. Playtime interventions should encourage participation in active games through the provision of playground equipment and markings.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Wood and Hall; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ekeland E, Heian F, Coren E: Can exercise improve self-esteem in children and young people? A systematic review of randomised control trials. Br J Sports Med 2005, 39:792-8.
• [2]Kristjansson A, Sigfusdottir I, Allegrante J: Health behaviour and academic achievement among adolescents: the relative contribution of dietary habits, physical activity, body mass index and self-esteem. Health Educ Behav 2007, 37:51-64.
• [3]Pretty J, Angus C, Bain M, Barton J, Gladwell V, Hine R, et al.: Nature, Childhood and Life Pathways. University of Essex, Colchester; 2009.
• [4]Janssen I, Leblanc AG: Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:40-56. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Janz K, Letuchy E, Eichenberger Gilmore JM, Burns TL, Torner JC, Willing MC, et al.: Early physical activity provides sustained bone health benefits later in childhood. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42:1072-8.
• [6]World Health Organisation: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. World Health Organisation, Geneva; 2012.
• [7]Faigenbaum AD, Myer GD: Exercise deficit disorder in youth: play now or pay later. Curr Sports Med Rep 2012, 11:196-200.
• [8]Health and Social Care Information Centre: Health Survey for ENGLAND 2012. Health and Social Care Information Centre, London; 2013.
• [9]Stratton G: Promoting children’s physical activity in primary school: an intervention study using playground markings. Ergonomics 2000, 43:1538-46.
• [10]Fairclough S, Stratton G: Physical education makes you fit and healthy. Physical education’s contribution to young people’s physical activity levels. Health Educ Res 2005, 20:14-23.
• [11]Ridgers ND, Stratton G, Fairclough SJ: Physical activity levels of children during school playtime. Sports Med 2006, 36:359-71.
• [12]Fairclough S, Beighle A, Erwin H, Ridgers N: School day segmented physical activity patterns of high and low active children. BMC Pub Health 2012, 12:406-18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Simons-Morton BG: Implementing health-related physical education. In Health and Fitness through Physical Education. Edited by Pate RR, Hohn RC. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL; 1994:137-46.
• [14]Wood C, Sandercock G and Barton J. Interactions between physical activity and the environment to improve adolescent self-esteem: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Env Health, in press.
• [15]Mersh R, Fairclough S: Physical activity, lesson context and teacher behaviours within the revised English national curriculum for physical education: a case study of one school. Eur Phys Educ Rev 2010, 16:29-45.
• [16]Marmeleira JFF, Aldeias NMC, Madeira Da Graca PMS: Physical activity levels in high school physical education. Eur Phys Educ Rev 2012, 18:191-204.
• [17]Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, Faucette N, Hovell MF: The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports, play and active recreation for kids. Am J Pub Health 1997, 87:1328-34.
• [18]Waring M, Warburton P, Coy M: Observation of children’s physical activity levels in primary school: is the school an ideal setting for meeting government activity targets. Eur Phys Educ Rev 2007, 13:25-40.
• [19]Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF: Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res 2002, 10:150-7.
• [20]Pulsford M, Cortina-Borja M, Rich C, Kinnafick FE, Dezateuz C and Gritffiths LJ. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. Plos One, 2011, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021822
• [21]Ridgers ND, Stratton G, Fairclough SJ, Twisk JR: Children’s physical activity levels during school recess: a quasi-experimental intervention study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007, 4:19-28. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Office for National Statistics. Neighbourhood Statistics. 2011. http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/. Accessed 7th Jan 2015.
• [23]Cole T, Freeman J, Preece M: Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child 1995, 73:25-9.
• [24]Meredith MD, Welk GJ: Chapter 9. Interpreting Fitnessgram results. In Fitnessgram/activitygram administration manual. Edited by Meredith MD, Welk GJ. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL; 2004:59-68.
• [25]Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG: Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci 2008, 26:1557-65.
• [26]Robusto KM, Trost SG: Comparison of three generations of ActiGraph™ activity monitors in children and adolescents. J Sports Sci 2010, 30:1429-35.
• [27]Inspectorate of Education: Improving Physical Education in Primary Schools. HM Inspectorate of Education, Edinburgh; 2001.
• [28]Thompson HR, Linchey J, Madsen KA: Are physical education policies working? A snapshot from San Fransciso, 2011. Preventing Chronic Diseases 2013, 10:1-10.
• [29]Kirk D: Physical education, youth sport and lifelong participation: the importance of early learning experiences. Eur Phys Educ Rev 2005, 11:239-55.
• [30]Ridgers ND, Fairclough SJ: Assessing free living physical activity using accelerometry: practical issues for researchers and practitioners. Eur J Sports Sci 2011, 11:205-13.
• [31]Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, Pfeiffer KA: Comparison of accelerometer cutpoints for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43:1360-8.