Artificial neural networks modeling gene-environment interaction

BMC Genetics

Karin Bammann²  Iris Pigeot¹  Frauke Günther¹ 

[1] BIPS - Institute for Epidemiology and Prevention Research GmbH, Bremen 28359, Achterstraße 30, Germany;University of Bremen, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Science (IPP), Bremen 28359, Grazer Straße 4, Germany

关键词: Simulation study;    Pattern recognition;    Neural network;    MLP;    Multilayer perceptron;    Gene-environment interaction;   

Others  :  1122464
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2156-13-37

 received in 2012-02-14, accepted in 2012-04-01,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Gene-environment interactions play an important role in the etiological pathway of complex diseases. An appropriate statistical method for handling a wide variety of complex situations involving interactions between variables is still lacking, especially when continuous variables are involved. The aim of this paper is to explore the ability of neural networks to model different structures of gene-environment interactions. A simulation study is set up to compare neural networks with standard logistic regression models. Eight different structures of gene-environment interactions are investigated. These structures are characterized by penetrance functions that are based on sigmoid functions or on combinations of linear and non-linear effects of a continuous environmental factor and a genetic factor with main effect or with a masking effect only.

Results

In our simulation study, neural networks are more successful in modeling gene-environment interactions than logistic regression models. This outperfomance is especially pronounced when modeling sigmoid penetrance functions, when distinguishing between linear and nonlinear components, and when modeling masking effects of the genetic factor.

Conclusion

Our study shows that neural networks are a promising approach for analyzing gene-environment interactions. Especially, if no prior knowledge of the correct nature of the relationship between co-variables and response variable is present, neural networks provide a valuable alternative to regression methods that are limited to the analysis of linearly separable data.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Günther et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Wray N, Goddard M, Visscher P: Prediction of individual genetic risk of complex disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2008, 18:257-263.
• [2]Gibson G: Decanalization and the origin of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10(2):134-140.
• [3]Galvan A, Ioannidis J, Dragani T: Beyond genome-wide association studies: genetic heterogeneity and individual predisposition to cancer. Trends Genet 2010, 26(3):132-141.
• [4]Abazyan B, Nomura J, Kannan G, Ishizuka K, Tamashiro K, Nucifora F, Pogorelov V, Ladenheim B, Yang C, Krasnova I, Cadet J, Pardo C, Mori S, Kamiya A, Vogel M, Sawa A, Ross C, Pletnikov M: Prenatal interaction of mutant DISC1 and immune activation produces adult psychopathology. Biol Psychiatry 2010, 68:1172-1181.
• [5]Hutter C, Slattery M, Duggan D, Muehling J, Curtin K, Hsu L, Beresford S, Rajkovic A, Sarto G, Marshall J, Hammad N, Wallace R, Makar K, Prentice R, Caan B, Potter J, Peters U: Characterization of the association between 8q24 and colon cancer: gene-environment exploration and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2010, 10:670. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Kazma R, Babron M, Génin E: Genetic association and gene-environment interaction: a new method for overcoming the lack of exposure information in controls. Am J Epidemiol 2011, 173(2):225-235.
• [7]Docherty S, Kovas Y, Plomin R: Gene-environment interaction in the etiology of mathematical ability using SNP sets. Behav Genet 2011, 41:141-154.
• [8]Tolonen S, Laaksonen M, Mikkilä V, Sievänen H, Mononen N, Räsänen L, Viikari J, Raitakari O, Kähönen M, Lehtimäki T: Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study Group: Lactase gene C/T13910 polymorphism, calcium intake, and pQCT bone traits in finnish adults. Calcified Tissue Int 2011, 58:153-161.
• [9]Bammann K, Pohlabeln H, Pigeot I, Jöckel K: Use of an artificial neural network in exploring the dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer risk in male. Far East J Theor Stat 2005, 16(2):285-302.
• [10]Günther F, Wawro N, Bammann K: Neural networks for modeling gene-gene interactions in association studies. BMC Genet 2009, 10:87.
• [11]Gago J, Landín M, Gallego P: Artificial neural networks modeling the in vitro rhizogenesis and acclimatization of Vitis vinifera L. J Plant Physiol 2010, 167:1226-1231.
• [12]Lin RH, Chuang CL: A hybrid diagnosis model for determining the types of the liver disease. Comput Biol Med 2010, 40(7):665-670.
• [13]Ioannidis J, Trikalinos T, Law M, Carr A: HIV Lipodystrophy Case Definition Study Group: HIV lipodystrophy case definition using artificial neural network modelling. Antivir Ther 2003, 8:435-441.
• [14]Amato R, Pinelli M, D’Andrea D, Miele G, Nicodemi M, Raiconi G, Cocozza S: A novel approach to simulate gene-environment interactions in complex diseases. BMC Bioinf 2010, 11:8. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Bishop C: Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
• [16]Schwarz G: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978, 6:461-464.
• [17]Development Core Team R: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009. [http://www.R-project.org webcite]. [ISBN 3-900051-07-0]
• [18]Günther F, Fritsch S: neuralnet: Training of neural networks. R J 2010, 2:30-38.
• [19]Efron B, Tibshirani R: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
• [20]Intrator O, Intrator N: Interpreting neural-network results: a simulation study. Comput Stat Data An 2001, 37:373-393.
• [21]Savegnago R, Nunes B, Caetano S, Ferraudo A, Schmidt G, Ledur M, Munari D: Comparison of logistic and neural network models to fit to the egg production curve of White Leghorn hens. Poult Sci 2011, 90(3):705-711.
• [22]Liew P, Lee Y, Lin Y, Lee T, Lee W, Wang W, Chien C: Comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression in prediction of gallbladder disease among obese patients. Digest Liver Dis 2007, 39(4):356-362.
• [23]Hecht-Nielsen R: Neurocomputing. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1990.
• [24]McCullagh P, Nelder J: Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall; 1983.
• [25]Riedmiller M: Advanced supervised learning in multi-layer perceptrons – from backpropagation to adaptive learning algorithms. Int J Comput Stand Interf 1994, 16:265-275.