Histone modifications involved in cassette exon inclusions: a quantitative and interpretable analysis

BMC Genomics

Shuigeng Zhou⁴  Jihong Guan¹  Ting Jin³  Hui Liu² 

[1] Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, 201804 Shanghai, China;Research Lab of Information Management, Changzhou University, 213164 Changzhou, China;School of Information Science and Technology, Hainan University, 570228 Hainan, China;Shanghai Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, and School of Computer Science, Fudan University, 200433 Shanghai, China

关键词: Quantitative analysis;    Alternative splicing;    Histone modifications;   

Others  :  1122649
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2164-15-1148

 received in 2014-08-26, accepted in 2014-11-20,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Chromatin structure and epigenetic modifications have been shown to involve in the co-transcriptional splicing of RNA precursors. In particular, some studies have suggested that some types of histone modifications (HMs) may participate in the alternative splicing and function as exon marks. However, most existing studies pay attention to the qualitative relationship between epigenetic modifications and exon inclusion. The quantitative analysis that reveals to what extent each type of epigenetic modification is responsible for exon inclusion is very helpful for us to understand the splicing process.

Results

In this paper, we focus on the quantitative analysis of HMs’ influence on the inclusion of cassette exons (CEs) into mature RNAs. With the high-throughput ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data obtained from ENCODE website, we modeled the association of HMs with CE inclusions by logistic regression whose coefficients are meaningful and interpretable for us to reveal the effect of each type of HM. Three type of HMs, H3K36me3, H3K9me3 and H4K20me1, were found to play major role in CE inclusions. HMs’ effect on CE inclusions is conservative across cell types, and does not depend on the expression levels of the genes hosting CEs. HMs located in the flanking regions of CEs were also taken into account in our analysis, and HMs within bounded flanking regions were shown to affect moderately CE inclusions. Moreover, we also found that HMs on CEs whose length is approximately close to nucleosomal-DNA length affect greatly on CE inclusion.

Conclusions

We suggested that a few types of HMs correlate closely to alternative splicing and perhaps function jointly with splicing machinery to regulate the inclusion level of exons. Our findings are helpful to understand HMs’ effect on exon definition, as well as the mechanism of co-transcriptional splicing.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ: Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8a resolution. Nature 1997, 389:251-260.
• [2]Richmond TJ, Davey CA: The structure of dna in the nucleosome core. Nature 2003, 423:145-150.
• [3]Kouzarides T: Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128:693-705.
• [4]Bernstein BE, Meissner A, Lander ES: The mammalian epigenome. Cell 2007, 128:669-681.
• [5]Saint-Andre V, Batsche E, Rachez C, Muchardt C: Histone h3 lysine 9 trimethylation and hp1γ favor inclusion of alternative exons. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18(3):337-344.
• [6]Dion MF, Altschuler SJ, Wu LF, Rando OJ: Genomic characterization reveals a simple histone h4 acetylation code. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:5501-5506.
• [7]Unnikrishnan A, Gafken PR, Tsukiyama T: Dynamic changes in histone acetylation regulate origins of dna replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010, 17(4):430-437.
• [8]Segal E, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Chen L, Thastrom A, Field Y, Moore IK, Wang JP, Widom J: A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 2006, 442(7104):772-778.
• [9]Li Z, Schug J, Tuteja G, White P, Kaestner KH: The nucleosome map of the mammalian liver. Nature 2011, 18(6):742-746.
• [10]Wang Z, Zang C, Rosenfeld JA, Schones DE, Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Peng W, Zhang MQ, Zhao K: Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet 2008, 40:897-903.
• [11]Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K: High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 2007, 129:823-837.
• [12]Schwartz S, Meshorer E, Ast G: Chromatin organization marks exon-intron structure. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009, 16(9):990-995.
• [13]Tilgner H, Nikolaou C, Althammer S, Sammeth M, Beato M, Valcarcel J, Guigo R: Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009, 16(9):996-1001.
• [14]Keren H, Lev-Maor G, Ast G: Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11(5):345-355.
• [15]Gelfman S, Burstein D, Penn O, Savchenko A, Amit M, Schwartz S, Pupko T, Ast G: Changes in exon-intron structure during vertebrate evolution affect the splicing pattern of exons. Genome Res 2012, 22(1):35-50.
• [16]Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova I, Zhang L, Mayr C, Kingsmore SF, Schroth GP, Burge CB: Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 2008, 456(7221):470-476.
• [17]Hnilicova J, Hozeifi S, Duskova E, Icha J, Tomankova T, Stanek D: Histone deacetylase activity modulates alternative splicing. PLoS One 2011, 6(2):16727.
• [18]Gan Q, Chepelev I, Wei G, Tarayrah L, Cui K, Zhao K, Chen X: Dynamic regulation of alternative splicing and chromatin structure in Drosophila gonads revealed by RNA-seq. Cell Res 2010, 20(7):763-783.
• [19]Andersson R, Enroth S, Rada-iglesias A, Wadelius C, Komorowski J: Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications. Genome Res 2009, 19:1732-1741.
• [20]Kim S, Kim H, Fong N, Erickson B, Bentley DL: Pre-mrna splicing is a determinant of histone h3k36 methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011, 108(33):13564-13569.
• [21]Kolasinska-Zwierz P, Down T, Latorre I, Liu T, Liu XS, Ahringer J: Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3. Nat Genet 2009, 41(3):376-381.
• [22]Huff JT, Plocik AM, Guthrie C, Yamamoto KR: Reciprocal intronic and exonic histone modification regions in humans. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010, 17(12):1495-1499.
• [23]Luco RF, Pan Q, Tominaga K, Blencowe BJ, Pereira-Smith OM, Misteli T: Regulation of alternative splicing by Histone modifications. Science 2010, 327(5968):996-1000.
• [24]Zhou YP, Lu YL, Tian WD: Epigenetic features are significantly associated with alternative splicing. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:123. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Enroth S, Bornelo S: Combinations of Histone modifications mark exon inclusion levels. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(1):29911.
• [26]Zhu S, Wang G, Liu B, Wang Y: Modeling exon expression using histone modifications. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(6):67448.
• [27]Katz Y, Wang ET, Airoldi EM, Burge CB: Analysis and design of rna sequencing experiments for identifying isoform regulation. Nat Methods 2010, 7(12):1009-1015.
• [28]Thomas DJ, Rosenbloom KR, Clawson H, Hinrichs AS, Trumbower H, Raney BJ, Karolchik D, Barber GP, Harte RA, Hillman-Jackson J, Kuhn RM, Rhead BL, Smith KE, Thakkapallayil A, Zweig AS, Haussler D, Kent WJ, Encode Project Consortium: The encode project at UC Santa Cruz. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35(Database issue):663-667.
• [29]Podlaha O, De S, Gonen M, Michor F: Histone modifications are associated with transcript isoform diversity in normal and cancer cells. PLoS Comput Biol 2014, 10(6):1003611.
• [30]Karlic R, Chung HR, Lasserre J, Vlahovicek K, Vingron M: Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression. PNAS 2010, 107(7):2926-29231.
• [31]Zhou HL, Hinman MN, Barron VA, Geng C, Zhou G, Luo G, Siegel RE, Lou H: Hu proteins regulate alternative splicing by inducing localized histone hyperacetylation in an rna-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108(36):627-635.
• [32]Gunderson FQ, Merkhofer EC, Johnson TL: Dynamic histone acetylation is critical for cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly and spliceosomal rearrangements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108(5):2004-2009.
• [33]Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L: Transcript assembly and quantification by rna-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28(5):511-515.
• [34]Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B: Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by rna-seq. Nat Methods 2008, 5(7):621-628.
• [35]Roy M, Kim N, Xing Y, Lee C: The effect of intron length on exon creation ratios during the evolution of mammalian genomes. RNA 2008, 14(11):2261-2273.
• [36]Moore MJ, Proudfoot NJ: Pre-mrna processing reaches back to transcription and ahead to translation. Cells 2009, 136:688-700.
• [37]Yu H, Zhu S, Zhou B, Xue H, Han JD: Inferring causal relationships among different histone modifications and gene expression. Res 2008, 18(8):1314-1324.
• [38]Dhami P, Saffrey P, Bruce AW, Dillon SC, Chiang K, Bonhoure N, Koch CM, Bye J, James K, Foad NS, Ellis P, Watkins NA, Ouwehand WH, Langford C, Andrews RM, Dunham I, Vetrie D: Complex exon-intron marking by histone modifications is not determined solely by nucleosome distribution. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(8):12339.
• [39]Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS: Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 2011, 473(7345):43-9.
• [40]Li H, Ruan J, Durbin R: Mapping short dna sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Nature 2008, 18(11):1851-1858.
• [41]Valouev A, Johnson SM, Boyd SD, Smith CL, Fire AZ, Sidow A: Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 2011, 474(7352):516-520.
• [42]Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L: Transcript assembly and quantification by rna-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28(5):511-515.
• [43]Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL: Tophat: discovering splice junctions with rna-seq. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(9):1105-1111.
• [44]Nilsen TW, Graveley BR: Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing. Nature 2010, 463(7280):457-463.