Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study of the Canadian public's perspectives

BMC Public Health

Maxwell J Smith²  Laena Maunula²  Sachin Sahni³  Cécile M Bensimon³  Ann Robertson¹  Jennifer L Gibson⁴  Diego S Silva² 

[1] Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada;Dalla Lana School of Public Health, and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada;Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada;Institute of Health Policy, Management, & Evaluation, and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada

关键词: Ethics;    Qualitative methods;    Public perspectives;    Pandemic influenza;    Priority setting;   

Others  :  1163734
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-241

 received in 2011-12-16, accepted in 2012-03-26,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Pandemic influenza may exacerbate existing scarcity of life-saving medical resources. As a result, decision-makers may be faced with making tough choices about who will receive care and who will have to wait or go without. Although previous studies have explored ethical issues in priority setting from the perspective of clinicians and policymakers, there has been little investigation into how the public views priority setting during a pandemic influenza, in particular related to intensive care resources.

Methods

To bridge this gap, we conducted three public town hall meetings across Canada to explore Canadian's perspectives on this ethical challenge. Town hall discussions group discussions were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Six interrelated themes emerged from the town hall discussions related to: ethical and empirical starting points for deliberation; criteria for setting priorities; pre-crisis planning; in-crisis decision-making; the need for public deliberation and input; and participants' deliberative struggle with the ethical issues.

Conclusions

Our findings underscore the importance of public consultation in pandemic planning for sustaining public trust in a public health emergency. Participants appreciated the empirical and ethical uncertainty of decision-making in an influenza pandemic and demonstrated nuanced ethical reasoning about priority setting of intensive care resources in an influenza pandemic. Policymakers may benefit from a better understanding the public's empirical and ethical 'starting points' in developing effective pandemic plans.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Silva et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Severe flu cases surge in Manitoba aboriginal community [http:/ / www.cbc.ca/ news/ canada/ manitoba/ story/ 2009/ 06/ 08/ mb-influenza-winnipeg.html] webcite
• [2]Halstead J: [http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2009/06/09/9734001-sun.html] webciteManitoba Aboriginals hardest hit by H1N1.
• [3]Moineddin R, Nie J, Domb G, Leong A, Upshur R: Seasonality of primary care utilization for respiratory diseases in Ontario: a time-series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:160. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Crighton E, Moineddin R, Mamdani M, Upshur R: Influenza and pneumonia hospitalizations in Ontario: a time-series analysis. Epidemiol Infect 2004, 132:1167-1174.
• [5]Upshur R, Knight K, Goel V: Time-series analysis of the relation between influenza virus and hospital admissions of the elderly in Ontario, Canada, for pneumonia, chronic lung disease, and congestive heart failure. Am J Epidemiol 1999, 149(1):85-92.
• [6]Silva D, Nie J, Rossiter K, Sahni S, Upshur R: Contextualizing ethics: ventilators, H1N1 and marginalized populations. Healthc Q 2010, 13(1):32-36.
• [7]Frolic A, Kata A, Kraus P: Development of a critical care triage protocol for pandemic influenza: integrating ethics, evidence and effectiveness. Healthc Q 2009, 12(4):56-64.
• [8]Lin J, Anderson-Shaw L: Rationing of resources: ethical issues in disasters and epidemic situations. Prehosp Disaster Med 2009, 24(3):215-221.
• [9]White D, Katz M, Luce J, Lo B: Who should receive life support during a public eealth emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions. Ann Intern Med 2009, 150(2):132-138.
• [10]Powell T, Christ K, Birkhead G: Allocation of ventilators in a public health disaster. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2008, 2(1):20-26.
• [11]Hick J, Rubinson L, O'Laughlin D, Farmer J: Allocating ventilators during large-scale disasters - problem, planning, and process. Crit Care 2007, 11(3):217-226. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Christian M, Hawryluck L, Wax R, Cook T, Lazar N, Herridge M, et al.: Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic. Can Med Assoc J 2006, 175(11):1377-1381.
• [13]Melnychuk R, Kenny N: Pandemic triage: the ethical challenge. Can Med Assoc J 2006, 175(11):1393-1394.
• [14]Rothstein MA: Should health care providers get treatment priority in an influenza pandemic? J Law Med Ethics 2010, 38:412-419.
• [15]Vawter DE, Garrett JE, Gervais KG, Prehn AW, DeBruin DA, Tauer CA, et al.: [http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/ethics/] webciteFor the good of us all: ethically rationing health resources in Minnesota in a severe influenza pandemic.
• [16]Frankish C, Kwan B, Ratner P, Higgins J, Larsen C: Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54:1471-1480.
• [17]Maloff B, Bilan D, Thurston W: Enhancing public input into decision making: development of the Calgary Regional Health Authority public participation framework. Fam Community Health 2000, 23(1):668-678.
• [18]Daniels N, Sabin J: Setting Limits Fairly: Can We Learn to Share Resources for Health. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
• [19]Cox SM, Kazubowski-Houston M, Nisker J: Genetics on stage: public engagement in health policy development on preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68(8):1472-1480.
• [20]Secko DM, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess MM: Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68(4):781-789.
• [21]Burgess MM: [http://www.ethics.ubc.ca/workingpapers/deg/deg002.pdf] webciteStarting on the right foot: public consultation to inform issue definition in genome policy.
• [22]Perhac R: Comparative risk assessment: where does the public fit in? Sci Technol Hum Val 1998, 23(2):221-241.
• [23]Gross A: The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Underst Sci 1994, 3:3-23.
• [24]Upshur R, Faith K, Gibson J, Thompson A, Tracy S, Wilson K, et al.: [http://www.canprep.ca/publications/stand_on_guard.pdf] webciteStand on guard for thee: Ethical considerations in preparedness planning for pandemic influenza.
• [25]Thompson AK, Faith K, Gibson JL, Upshur REG: Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Med Ethics 2006, 7:12. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Thomas J, Dasgupta N, Martinot A: Ethics in a pandemic: a survey of the state pandemic plans. Am J Public Health 2007, 97(S1):S26-S31.
• [27]Cetron M, Landwirth J: Public health and ethical considerations in planning for quarantine. Yale J Biol Med 2005, 78:325-330.
• [28]Lincoln YS, Guba E: Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage Publications; 1985.
• [29]Ritvo P, Wilson K, Gibson JL, Guglietti C, Tracy SC, Nie JX, Jadad AR, Upshur RE: Canadian survey on pandemic flu preparations. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:125.
• [30]Cookson R, Dolan P: Public views on health care rationing: a group discussion study. Health Policy 1999, 49(1-2):63-74.
• [31]Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J: Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review. Health Policy 2009, 91:219-228.
• [32]Bombard Y, Abelson J, Simeonov D, Gauvin FP: Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: a participatory approach. Soc Sci Med 2011, 73(1):135-144.