Clinicians' management strategies for patients with dyspepsia: a qualitative approach

BMC Gastroenterology

Margareta Troein²  Bodil Ohlsson¹  Kerstin Knutsson³ 

[1]Department of Clinical Sciences, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

[2]Department of Community Medicine, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

[3]Faculty of Odontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

关键词: qualitative evaluation;    dyspepsia;    decision-making;    gastrointestinal tract;   

Others  :  1216710
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-230X-5-15

 received in 2004-11-24, accepted in 2005-05-15,  发布年份 2005

【 摘 要 】

Background

Symptoms from the upper gastrointestinal tract are frequently encountered in clinical practice and may be of either organic or functional origin. For some of these conditions, according to the literature, certain management strategies can be recommended. For other conditions, the evidence is more ambiguous. The hypothesis that guided our study design was twofold: Management strategies and treatments suggested by different clinicians vary considerably, even when optimal treatment is clear-cut, as documented by evidence in the literature. Clinicians believe that the management strategies of their colleagues are similar to their own.

Methods

Simulated case histories of four patients with symptoms from the upper gastrointestinal tract were presented to 27 Swedish clinicians who were specialists in medical gastroenterology, surgery, and general practice and worked at three hospitals in the southern part of Sweden. The patients' histories contained information on the patient's sex and age and the localisation of the symptoms, but descriptions of subjective symptoms and findings from examinations differed from history to history. Interviews containing open-ended questions were conducted.

Results

For the same patient, the management strategies and treatments suggested by the clinicians varied widely, as did the strategies suggested by clinicians in the same speciality. Variation was more pronounced if the case history noted symptoms but no organic findings than if the case history noted unambiguous findings and symptoms. However, even in cases with a consensus in the scientific literature on treatment, the variations in clinicians' opinion on management were pronounced.

Conclusion

Despite these variations, the clinicians believed that the decisions made by their colleagues would be similar to their own. The overall results of this study indicate that we as researchers must make scientific evidence comprehensible and communicate evidence so that clinicians are able to interpret and implement it in practice. Of particular significance is that scientific evidence leads to an evidence-based care which is effective clinical practice and to the promotion of health from the perspective of the patient, together with cost-effectiveness as a priority.

【 授权许可】

   
2005 Knutsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Eddy DM: Variations in clinician practice: the role of uncertainty. In Professional judgement. A reader in clinical decision making. Edited by Dowie J, Elstein A. Cambridge: University Press; 1996:45-59.
• [2]Wigton RS: Applications of judgment analysis and cognitive feedback to medicine. In Human judgment. The SJT view. Edited by Brehmer B, Joyce CRB. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1988:227-245.
• [3]SBU-The Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care: Dyspepsia-methods of diagnosis and treatment. Summary. Stockholm. 2001.
• [4]Agréus L, Svärdsudd K, Nyrén O, Tibblin G: The epidemiology of abdominal symptoms: prevalence and demographic characteristics in a Swedish adult population. A report from the Abdominal Symptom Study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994, 29:102-109.
• [5]Johnsen R, Straume B, Førde OH: Peptic ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia-a disease and a disorder. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988, 6:239-243.
• [6]Johnsen R, Bernersen B, Straume B, Førde OH, Bostad L, Burhol PG: Prevalence of endoscopic and histologic findings in subjects with and without dyspepsia. BMJ 1991, 302:749-752.
• [7]Richter JE, Peura D, Benjamin SB, Joelsson B, Whipple J: Efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of symptomatic acid reflux disease without esophagitis. Arch Intern Med 2000, 26:1810-1816.
• [8]Farup PG, Hovde O, Breder O: Are frequent short gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes the cause of symptoms in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia responding to treatment with ranitidine? Scand J Gastroenterol 1995, 30:829-832.
• [9]Farup PG, Hovde O, Torp R, Wetterhus S: Patients with functional dyspepsia responding to omeprazole have a characteristic gastro-oesophageal reflux pattern. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999, 34:575-579.
• [10]Moayyedi P, Soo S, Deeks J, Forman D, Mason J, Innes M, Delaney B: Systematic review and economic evaluation of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Dyspepsia Review Group. BMJ 2000, 321:659-664.
• [11]Talley NJ, Vakil N, Ballard ED 2nd, Fennerty MB: Absence of benefit of eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med 1999, 341:1106-1111.
• [12]Brehmer A, Brehmer B: What have we learned about human judgment from thirty years of policy capturing? In Human judgment. The SJT view. Edited by Brehmer B, Joyce CRB. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1988:75-114.
• [13]Apoteksbolaget: Svensk läkemedelsstatistik 1998. Stockholm. 1999. In Swedish.
• [14]Wigton RS, Hoellerich VL, Patil KD: How physicans use clinical imformation in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. An application of conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making 1986, 6:2-11.
• [15]Wennberg JE: Understanding geographic variation in health care delivery. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:52-53.
• [16]Folland S, Goodman AC, Stano M: The economics of health care. New York: Macmillan; 1993.
• [17]Wu JC, Chan FK, Wong SK, Lee YT, Leung WK, Sung JJ: Effect of helicobacter pylori eradication on oesophageal acid exposure in patients with reflux oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002, 16:545-552.
• [18]Chassin MR: Explaining geographic variations: the enthusiasm hypothesis. Med Care 1993, 31( 5 Suppl):YS37-YS44.
• [19]Åkerblom A, Knutsson K, Petersson K, Reit C, Rohlin M: The major factors that influence endodontic retreatment decisions. Swed Dent J 2003, 27:23-9.
• [20]Eckerlund I: Essays on the economics of medical practice variations. PhD thesis. Stockholm School of Economics: The Economic Research Institute; 2001.
• [21]Grol R: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997, 315:418-421.
• [22]Grol R, Grimshaw J: From best evidence to best practice. Effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003, 362:1225-1230.
• [23]Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM: Changing physicians' practice. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:1271-1274.
• [24]Coulter A: Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up- and there's no going back. BMJ 1999, 319:719-720.