“Concerns” about medical students’ adverse behaviour and attitude: an audit of practice at Nottingham, with mapping to GMC guidance

BMC Medical Education

Janet Yates¹ 

[1] Research Fellow, Medical Education Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

关键词: GMC guidance;    Fitness-to-practise;    Audit;    Unprofessional behaviour;    Medical students;   

Others  :  1091210
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-14-196

 received in 2014-03-24, accepted in 2014-09-17,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The development and maintenance of students’ professional behaviour and attitude is of increasing importance in medical education. Unprofessional behaviour in doctors has the potential to jeopardise patient safety, compromise working relationships, and cause disruption and distress. The General Medical Council issues guidance to medical schools and students describing the standards that should be attained.

Nottingham University medical school introduced a ‘Concerns’ form in 2009, to create a standardised, transparent and defensible means of recording and handling complaints about adverse attitudes or behaviours. This paper reports an audit of the system over the first three years.

Methods

The routinely-held database was enhanced with further detail collected from relevant student records. The data were explored in terms of the types of complaint, students who were reported, the people who reported them, and the actions taken afterwards. The data were also mapped to the current GMC guidance.

Results

189 valid forms were generated, relating to 143 students. The form was used by a wide variety of people, including clinical and non-clinical teachers, administrators, Hall Wardens, and fellow students. The concerns ranged from infringements of regulations to serious fitness to practise issues. Most were dealt with by faculty or pastoral care staff but some required escalation to formal hearings. The complaints were mapped successfully to GMC documentation, with the highest proportions relating to the GMC categories ‘Good Clinical Care’ and ‘Working with Colleagues’.

Male and ethnic minority students appeared to be more likely to have a Concern raised, but this is a tentative conclusion that requires a larger sample. Undergraduate (as opposed to Graduate Entry) students may also be at greater risk.

Conclusions

A simple form, freely available, but designed to prevent frivolous or malicious use, has provided valuable data on unprofessional behaviour and the responses elicited. Some parts of the form require improvements, and these are underway to provide more efficient use, audit and review in future.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Yates; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Papadakis M, Hodgson C, Teherani A, Kohatsu N: Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a State Medical Board. Acad Med 2004, 79:244-249.
• [2]Papadakis M, Teherani A, Banach M, Knettler T, Rattner S, Stern D, Veloski J, Hodgson C: Disciplinary action by Medical Boards and prior behaviour in medical school. New Engl J Med 2005, 353:2673-2682.
• [3]Teherani A, O’Sullivan P, Lovett M, Hauer K: Categorization of unprofessional behaviours identified during administration of and remediation after a comprehensive clinical performance examination using a validated professionalism framework. Med Teach 2009, 31:1007-1012.
• [4]Parker M, Turner J, McGurgan P, Emmerton L, McAllister L, Wilkinson D: The difficult problem: assessing medical students’ professional attitudes and behaviour. Med J Austr 2010, 11/12:662-664.
• [5]van Mook W, Gorter S, de Grave W, van Luijk S, Wass V, Zwaveling J, Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C: Bad apples spoil the barrel: addressing unprofessional behaviour. Med Teach 2010, 32:891-898.
• [6]General Medical Council: Tomorrow’s Doctors. London: GMC; 2009. http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors_2009.asp webcite
• [7]General Medical Council and Medical Schools Council: Medical Students: Professional Values and Fitness to Practise. London: GMC; 2009. http://www.gmc-org.uk/education/undergraduate/professional_behaviour.asp webcite
• [8]Brockbank S, David T, Patel L: Unprofessional behaviour in medical students: A questionnaire-based pilot study comparing perceptions of the public with medical students and doctors. Med Teach 2011, 33:e501-e508.
• [9]Roff S, Chandratilake M, McAleer S, Gibson J: Preliminary benchmarking of appropriate sanctions for lapses in undergraduate professionalism in the health professions. Med Teach 2011, 33:234-238.
• [10]Garner J, O’Sullivan H: Facebook and the professional behaviours of undergraduate medical students. Clin Teach 2010, 7:112-115.
• [11]Osman A, Wardle A, Caesar R: Online professionalism and Facebook - falling through the generation gap. Med Teach 2012, 34:e549-e556.
• [12]University of Nottingham Schoool of Medicine: Social Media. Guidance for medical students. 2012. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/medicine/documents/medicine-policies/social-media-guidance-v1-2-8072012.pdf webcite (accessed March 19th 2014)
• [13]General Medical Council: Doctors’ use of social media. London: GMC; 2013. http://www.gmc-org.uk/static/documents/content/Doctors_use_of_social_media.pdf webcite
• [14]General Medical Council: Social media: what does it mean for you? In Student News Archives, January 2012. GMC; 2012. http://www.gmc-uk.org/information_for_you/11851.asp webcite
• [15]Dyrbye LN, Harper W, Moutier C, Durning SJ, Power DV, Massie FS, Eacker A, Thomas MR, Satele D, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD: A multi-institutional study exploring the impact of positive mental health on medical students’ professionalism in an era of high burnout. Acad Med 2012, 87:1024-1031.
• [16]Medical Schools Council/General Medical Council: Supporting medical students with mental health conditions. Manchester: GMC; 2013. http://www.medschools.ac.uk/Publications/Documents/Mental-Health-Guidance.pdf webcite
• [17]Yates J: Development of a ‘toolkit’ to identify medical students at risk of failure to thrive on the course: an exploratory retrospective case study. BMC Med Educ 2011, 11:95. BioMed Central Full Text