期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genetics
Pacific and Atlantic Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer, 1838) are allopatric subspecies: Lepeophtheirus salmonis salmonis and L. salmonis oncorhynchi subspecies novo
Kevin Alan Glover2  Ole Torrissen1  Rasmus Skern-Mauritzen1 
[1] Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870, Nordnes. 5817, Bergen, Norway;Sea Lice Research Centre, Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
关键词: Phylogenetics;    Copepodids;    Reproduction;    Salmon louse;    Sea lice;    Subspecies;    COI;    Hybrid fitness;   
Others  :  866618
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2156-15-32
 received in 2013-09-23, accepted in 2014-03-10,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis is a parasitic copepod that infects salmonids in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Although considered as a single species, morphological and biological differences have been reported between lice from the two oceans. Likewise, studies based on nucleotide sequencing have demonstrated that sequence differences between Atlantic and Pacific L. salmonis are highly significant, albeit smaller than the divergence observed between congeneric copepod species.

Results

We demonstrated reproductive compatibility between L. salmonis from the two oceans and successfully established F2 hybrid strains using separate maternal lines from both the Pacific and Atlantic. The infection success for the F2 hybrid strains were similar to results typically observed for non hybrid lice strains in the rearing facility used. Lepeophtheirus salmonis COI and 16S sequences divergence between individuals from the Pacific and the Atlantic oceans was high compared to what may be expected within a copepod species and phylogenetic analysis showed that they consistently formed monophyletic clades representing their origin from the Pacific or Atlantic oceans.

Conclusions

Lepeophtheirus salmonis from the Pacific and Atlantic oceans are reproductively compatible at least until adults at the F2 hybrid stage, and should not be regarded as separate species based on reproductive segregation or sequence divergence levels. Reported biological and genetic differences in L. salmonis seen in conjunction with the reported genetic diversity commonly observed between and within species demonstrate that Atlantic and Pacific L. salmonis should be regarded as two subspecies: Lepeophtheirus salmonis salmonis and L. salmonis oncorhynchi subsp. nov.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Skern-Mauritzen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140727075902660.pdf 2113KB PDF download
104KB Image download
110KB Image download
113KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Johnson SC, Treasurer JW, Bravo S, Nagasawa K, Kabata Z: A review of the impact of parasitic copepods on marine aquaculture. Zool Stud 2004, 43:229-243.
  • [2]Costello MJ: The global economic cost of sea lice to the salmonid farming industry. J Fish Dis 2009, 32:115-118.
  • [3]Krkosek M, Lewis MA, Volpe JP: Transmission dynamics of parasitic sea lice from farm to wild salmon. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 2005, 272:689-696.
  • [4]Tully O, Gargan P, Poole WR, Whelan KF: Spatial and temporal variation in the infestation of sea trout (Salmo trutta L.) by the caligid copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer) in relation to sources of infection in Ireland. Parasitology 1999, 119:41-51.
  • [5]Bjorn PA, Finstad B: Salmon Lice, Lepeophtheirus Salmonis (Kroyer), Infestation in Sympatric Populations of Arctic Char, Salvelinus Alpinus (L.), And Sea Trout, Salmo Trutta (L.), In Areas Near and Distant From Salmon Farms. Ices J Mar Sci 2002, 59:131-139.
  • [6]Morton A, Routledge R, Peet C, Ladwig A: Sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infection rates on juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum (Oncorhynchus keta) salmon in the nearshore marine environment of British Columbia, Canada. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2004, 61:147-157.
  • [7]Hamre LA, Eichner C, Caipang CM, Dalvin S, Bron JE, Nilsen F, Boxshall G, Skern-Mauritzen R: The Salmon Louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae) Life Cycle Has Only Two Chalimus Stages. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(9):e73539.
  • [8]Glover KA, Stolen AB, Messmer A, Koop BF, Torrissen O, Nilsen F: Population genetic structure of the parasitic copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis throughout the Atlantic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2011, 427:161-172.
  • [9]Tjensvoll K, Glover KA, Nylund A: Sequence variation in four mitochondrial genes of the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis. Dis Aquat Organ 2006, 68:251-259.
  • [10]Todd CD, Walker AM, Ritchie MG, Graves JA, Walker AF: Population genetic differentiation of sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) parasitic on Atlantic and Pacific salmonids: analyses of microsatellite DNA variation among wild and farmed hosts. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2004, 61:1176-1190.
  • [11]Messmer AM, Rondeau EB, Jantzen SG, Lubieniecki KP, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Assessment of population structure in Pacific Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer) using single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite genetic markers. Aquaculture 2011, 320:183-192.
  • [12]Dawson LHJ, Pike AW, Houlihan DF, McVicar AH: Effects of salmon lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis on sea trout Salmo trutta at different times after seawater transfer. Dis Aquat Organ 1998, 33:179-186.
  • [13]Bjorn PA, Finstad B: The Development of Salmon Lice (Lepeophtheirus Salmonis) on Artificially Infected Post Smolts of Sea Trout (Salmo Trutta). Can J Zool 1998, 76:970-977.
  • [14]Skugor S, Glover KA, Nilsen F, Krasnov A: Local and systemic gene expression responses of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) to infection with the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis). BMC Genomics 2008, 9:498. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [15]Krasnov A, Skugor S, Todorcevic M, Glover KA, Nilsen F: Gene expression in Atlantic salmon skin in response to infection with the parasitic copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis, cortisol implant, and their combination. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:130. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [16]Boulding EG, deWaard JR, Ang KP, Hebert PN: Population genetic structure of the salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer) on wild and farmed salmonids around the Pacific coast of Canada. Aquac Res 2009, 40:973-979.
  • [17]Yazawa R, Yasuike M, Leong J, von Schalburg KR, Cooper GA, Beetz-Sargent M, Robb A, Davidson WS, Jones SRM, Koop BF: EST and Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Support a Distinct Pacific Form of Salmon Louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis. Mar Biotechnol 2008, 10:741-749.
  • [18]Rocha-Olivares A, Fleeger JW, Foltz DW: Decoupling of molecular and morphological evolution in deep lineages of a meiobenthic harpacticoid copepod. Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18:1088-1102.
  • [19]Marincovich L, Gladenkov AY: Evidence for an early opening of the Bering Strait. Nature 1999, 397:149-151.
  • [20]Johnson SC, Albright LJ: The developmental stages of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer, 1837) (Copepoda, Caligidae). Can J Zool 1991, 69:929-950.
  • [21]Schram TA: Supplementary descriptions of the developmental stages of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer, 1837) (Copepoda: Caligidae). In Pathogens of Wild and Farmed Fish: Sea Lice. Edited by Boxshall GA, Defaye D. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood; 1993:30-47.
  • [22]Johnson SC, Albright LJ: Development, Growth, and Survival of Lepeophtheirus-Salmonis (Copepoda, Caligidae) under Laboratory Conditions. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 1991, 71:425-436.
  • [23]Heuch PA, Nordhagen JR, Schram TA: Egg Production in the Salmon Louse [Lepeophtheirus Salmonis (Kroyer)] in Relation to Origin and Water Temperature. Aquac Res 2000, 31:805-814.
  • [24]Johnson SC, Albright LJ: Comparative Susceptibility and Histopathology of the Response of Naive Atlantic, Chinook and Coho Salmon to Experimental-Infection with Lepeophtheirus-Salmonis (Copepoda, Caligidae). Dis Aquat Organ 1992, 14:179-193.
  • [25]Bricknell IR, Dalesman SJ, O’Shea B, Pert CC, Luntz AJM: Effect of environmental salinity on sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis settlement success. Dis Aquat Organ 2006, 71:201-212.
  • [26]Jones S, Kim E, Dawe S: Experimental infections with Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer) on threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., and juvenile Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. J Fish Dis 2006, 29:489-495.
  • [27]Jones SRM, Prosperi-Porta G, Kim E, Callow P, Hargreaves NB: The occurrence of Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus clemensi (Copepoda : Caligidae) on three-spine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus in coastal British Columbia. J Parasitol 2006, 92:473-480.
  • [28]Pert CC, Mordue AJ, O’Shea B, Bricknell IR: The settlement and reproductive success of Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer 1837; Copepoda: Caligidae) on atypical hosts. Aquac Res 2012, 43:799-805.
  • [29]Lyndon AR, Toovey JPG: Occurrence of gravid salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer)) on saithe (Pollachius virens (L.)) from salmon farm cages. Bull Eur Assn Fish Pathol 2001, 21:84-85.
  • [30]Hamre LA, Glover KA, Nilsen F: Establishment and characterisation of salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer 1837)) laboratory strains. Parasitol Int 2009, 58:451-460.
  • [31]Hamre LA, Nilsen F: Individual fish tank arrays in studies of Lepeophtheirus salmonis and lice loss variability. Dis Aquat Organ 2011, 97:47-56.
  • [32]Nolan DV, Martin SAM, Kelly Y, Glennon K, Palmer R, Smith T, McCormack GP, Powell R: Development of microsatellite PCR typing methodology for the sea louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Kroyer). Aquac Res 2000, 31:815-822.
  • [33]Nolan DV, Powell R: Geographic and temporal genetic structure in Lepeophtheirus salmonis from four salmon farms along the northwest and west coasts of Ireland: results from a microsatellite analysis. Hydrobiologia 2009, 617:55-63.
  • [34]Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28:2731-2739.
  • [35]Tamura K, Nei M: Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 1993, 10:512-526.
  • [36]Lee CE: Global phylogeography of a cryptic copepod species complex and reproductive isolation between genetically proximate “populations”. Evolution 2000, 54:2014-2027.
  • [37]Ganz HH, Burton RS: Genetic Differentiation and Reproductive Incompatibility among Baja-California Populations of the Copepod Tigriopus-Californicus. Mar Biol 1995, 123:821-827.
  • [38]Grishanin AK, Rasch EM, Dodson SI, Wyngaard GA: Genetic architecture of the cryptic species complex of Acanthocyclops vernalis (Crustacea : Copepoda). II. Crossbreeding experiments, cytogenetics, and a model of chromosomal evolution. Evolution 2006, 60:247-256.
  • [39]Pritchard VL, Dimond L, Harrison JS, Velazquez CCS, Zieba JT, Burton RS, Edmands S: Interpopulation hybridization results in widespread viability selection across the genome in Tigriopus californicus. BMC Genet 2011, 12:54.
  • [40]Willett CS: Deleterious epistatic interactions between electron transport system protein-coding loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Genetics 2006, 173:1465-1477.
  • [41]Glover KA, Hamre LA, Skaala O, Nilsen F: A comparison of sea louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infection levels in farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) stocks. Aquaculture 2004, 232:41-52.
  • [42]Glover KA, Nilsen F, Skaala O: Individual variation in sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infection on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2004, 241:701-709.
  • [43]Glover KA, Nilsen F, Skaala O, Taggart JB, Teale AJ: Differences in Susceptibility to Sea Lice Infection Between a Sea Run and a Freshwater Resident Population of Brown Trout. J Fish Biol 2001, 59:1512-1519.
  • [44]Edmands S: Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 1999, 53:1757-1768.
  • [45]Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR: Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 2003, 270:313-321.
  • [46]Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR: Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 2003, 270:S96-S99.
  • [47]Bucklin A, Guarnieri M, Hill RS, Bentley AM, Kaartvedt S: Taxonomic and systematic assessment of planktonic copepods using mitochondrial COI sequence variation and competitive, species-specific PCR. Hydrobiologia 1999, 401:239-254.
  • [48]Lefebure T, Douady CJ, Gouy M, Gibert J: Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: Proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation. Mol Phyl Evol 2006, 40:435-447.
  • [49]Parent GJ, Plourde S, Turgeon J: Natural hybridization between Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis (Copepoda) in the Arctic and Northwest Atlantic. Limnol Oceanol 2012, 57:1057-1066.
  • [50]Bucklin A, Lajeunesse TC: Molecular-genetic variation of calanus-pacificus (copepoda, calanoida) - preliminary evaluation of genetic-structure and subspecific differentiation based on mtdna sequences. Calif Coop Ocean Fish Invest Rep 1994, 35:45-51.
  • [51]Nuwer M, Frost B, Armbrust EV: Population structure of the planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus in the North Pacific Ocean. Mar Biol 2008, 156:107-115.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:30次 浏览次数:17次