| BMC Public Health | |
| The impact of the UK ‘Act FAST’ stroke awareness campaign: content analysis of patients, witness and primary care clinicians’ perceptions | |
| Martin White2  Martin P Eccles3  Gary A Ford6  Madeleine J Murtagh4  Richard G Thomson3  Helen Rodgers5  Vera Araujo-Soares3  Falko F Sniehotta2  Joan E Mackintosh3  Stephan U Dombrowski1  | |
| [1] Division of Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Cottrell Building, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK;Fuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK;Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK;Institute for Ageing & Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AE, UK;Acute Stroke Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK | |
| 关键词: Mass-media campaign; Awareness; Stroke; Delay; | |
| Others : 1161707 DOI : 10.1186/1471-2458-13-915 |
|
| received in 2013-01-07, accepted in 2013-09-30, 发布年份 2013 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
The English mass media campaign ‘Act FAST’ aimed to raise stroke awareness and the need to call emergency services at the onset of suspected stroke. We examined the perceived impact and views of the campaign in target populations to identify potential ways to optimise mass-media interventions for stroke.
Methods
Analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted as part of two qualitative studies, which examined factors influencing patient/witness response to acute stroke symptoms (n = 19 stroke patients, n = 26 stroke witnesses) and perceptions about raising stroke awareness in primary care (n = 30 clinicians). Both studies included questions about the ‘Act FAST’ campaign. Interviews were content analysed to determine campaign awareness, perceived impact on decisions and response to stroke, and views of the campaign.
Results
Most participants were aware of the Act FAST campaign. Some patients and witnesses reported that the campaign impacted upon their stroke recognition and response, but the majority reported no impact. Clinicians often perceived campaign success in raising stroke awareness, but few thought it would change response behaviours. Some patients and witnesses, and most primary care clinicians expressed positive views towards the campaign. Some more critical participant comments included perceptions of dramatic, irrelevant, and potentially confusing content, such as a prominent ‘fire in the brain’ analogy.
Conclusions
Act FAST has had some perceived impact on stroke recognition and response in some stroke patients and witnesses, but the majority reported no campaign impact. Primary care clinicians were positive about the campaign, and believed it had impacted on stroke awareness and recognition but doubted impact on response behaviour. Potential avenues for optimising and complementing mass media campaigns such as ‘Act FAST’ were identified.
【 授权许可】
2013 Dombrowski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150413040250104.pdf | 223KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Lecouturier J, Rodgers H, Murtagh MJ, White M, Ford GA, Thomson RG: Systematic review of mass media interventions designed to improve public recognition of stroke symptoms, emergency response and early treatment. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:784. BioMed Central Full Text
- [2]Davis SM: Community stroke education using mass media: past results and future implications. Stroke 2007, 38(7):2034-2035.
- [3]Hodgson C, Lindsay P, Rubini F: Can mass media influence emergency department visits for stroke? Stroke 2007, 38(7):2115-2122.
- [4]Stroke: Act F.A.S.T. http://www.nhs.uk/Actfast/Pages/stroke.aspx webcite
- [5]National Audit Office: Progress in improving stroke care. London: The Stationary Office; 2010.
- [6]Robinson TG, Reid A, Haunton VJ, Wilson A, Naylor AR: The face arm speech test: does it encourage rapid recognition of important stroke warning symptoms? Emerg Med J 2013, 30(6):467-471.
- [7]Mellon L, Hickey A, Doyle F, Dolan E, Williams D: Can a media campaign change health service use in a population with stroke symptoms? Examination of the first Irish stroke awareness campaign. Emerg Med J 2013. Epub ahead of print
- [8]Mackintosh JE, Murtagh MJ, Rodgers H, et al.: Why People Do, or Do Not, Immediately Contact Emergency Medical Services following the Onset of Acute Stroke: Qualitative Interview Study. PLoS One 2012, 7:10.
- [9]Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Mackintosh J, White M, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Murtagh MJ, Ford GA, Eccles MP, Araujo-Soares V: Witness response at acute onset of stroke: a qualitative theory-guided study. PLoS One 2012, 7:7.
- [10]Krippendorff K: Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
- [11]Bray JE, O’Connell B, Gilligan A, Livingston PM, Bladin C: Is FAST stroke smart? Do the content and language used in awareness campaigns describe the experience of stroke symptoms? Int J Stroke 2010, 5(6):440-446.
- [12]Jones SP, Carter B, Ford GA, Gibson JME, Leathley MJ, McAdam JJ, O’Donnell M, Punekar S, Quinn T, Watkins CL, et al.: The identification of acute stroke: an analysis of emergency calls. Int J Stroke 2013, 8:408-412.
- [13]Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D, Davis J, Louw SJ, Ford GA: Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke 2003, 34(1):71-76.
- [14]Harbison J, Massey A, Barnett L, Hodge D, Ford GA: Rapid ambulance protocol for acute stroke. Lancet 1999, 353(9168):1935.
- [15]Know the signs of stroke. http://www.nhs.uk/actfast/Pages/know-the-signs.aspx webcite
- [16]Stroke. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Longtermconditions/Vascular/Stroke/index.htm webcite
- [17]Witte K, Allen M: A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav 2000, 27(5):591-615.
- [18]Ruiter RAC, Abraham C, Kok G: Scary warnings and rational precautions: a review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychol Health 2001, 16(6):613-630.
- [19]Peters GJY, Ruiter RAC, Kok G: Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review 2013, 7(1):S8-S31.
- [20]Noar SM: A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: where do we go from here? J Health Commun 2006, 11(1):21-42.
- [21]Teuschl Y, Brainin M: Stroke education: discrepancies among factors influencing prehospital delay and stroke knowledge. Int J Stroke 2010, 5(3):187-208.
- [22]Jones SP, Jenkinson AJ, Leathley MJ, Watkins CL: Stroke knowledge and awareness: an integrative review of the evidence. Age Ageing 2010, 39(1):11-22.
- [23]Lecouturier J, Murtagh MJ, Thomson RG, Ford GA, White M, Eccles M, Rodgers H: Response to symptoms of stroke in the UK: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:157. BioMed Central Full Text
- [24]Bray JE, Mosley I, Bailey M, Barger B, Bladin C: Stroke public pwareness pampaigns pave increased ambulance dispatches for stroke in Melbourne, Australia. Stroke 2011, 42:2154-2157.
- [25]Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC: Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet 2010, 376(9748):1261-1271.
PDF