Synergistic effects of noradrenergic modulation with atomoxetine and 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor learning in healthy humans

BMC Neuroscience

Peter Schwenkreis²  Klaus Funke¹  Dirk Jancke³  Hubert R Dinse³  Martin Tegenthoff²  Oliver Höffken²  Alica Bauknecht²  Matthias Sczesny-Kaiser² 

[1] Department of Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, Institute of Physiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany;Department of Neurology, BG-Universitaetsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Buerkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany;Institute for Neuroinformatics, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany

关键词: Motor cortex;    Plasticity;    Atomoxetine;    Norepinephrine;    Neuromodulation;    rTMS;   

Others  :  799414
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2202-15-46

 received in 2014-01-05, accepted in 2014-03-27,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is able to induce changes in neuronal activity that outlast stimulation. The underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. They might be analogous to long-term potentiation or depression, as the duration of the effects seems to implicate changes in synaptic plasticity. Norepinephrine (NE) has been shown to play a crucial role in neuronal plasticity in the healthy and injured human brain. Atomoxetine (ATX) and other NE reuptake inhibitors have been shown to increase excitability in different systems and to influence learning processes. Thus, the combination of two facilitative interventions may lead to further increase in excitability and motor learning. But in some cases homeostatic metaplasticity might protect the brain from harmful hyperexcitability. In this study, the combination of 60 mg ATX and 10 Hz rTMS over the primary motor cortex was used to examine changes in cortical excitability and motor learning and to investigate their influence on synaptic plasticity mechanisms.

Results

The results of this double-blind placebo-controlled study showed that ATX facilitated corticospinal and intracortical excitability in motor cortex. 10 Hertz rTMS applied during a motor task was able to further increase intracortical excitability only in combination with ATX. In addition, only the combination of 10 Hz rTMS and ATX was capable of enhancing the total number of correct responses and reaction time significantly, indicating an interaction effect between rTMS and ATX without signs of homeostatic metaplasticity.

Conclusion

These results suggest that pharmacologically enhanced NE transmission and 10 Hz rTMS exert a synergistic effect on motor cortex excitability and motor learning in healthy humans.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Sczesny-Kaiser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Chen R: Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Muscle Nerve Suppl 2000, 9:S26-S32.
• [2]Ridding MC, Rothwell JC: Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:559-567.
• [3]Hoogendam JM, Ramakers GM, Di Lazzaro L: Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul 2010, 3:95-118.
• [4]Ridding MC, Rothwell JC: Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997, 105:340-344.
• [5]Rosenkranz K, Williamon A, Rothwell JC: Motorcortical excitability and synaptic plasticity is enhanced in professional musicians. J Neurosci 2007, 27:5200-5206.
• [6]Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselmann P, Marsden CD: Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 1993, 471:501-519.
• [7]Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, Profice P, Ferrara L, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC: Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp Brain Res 1998, 119:265-268.
• [8]Tegenthoff M, Cornelius B, Pleger B, Malin JP, Schwenkreis P: Amphetamine enhances training-induced motor cortex plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand 2004, 109:330-336.
• [9]Sczesny-Kaiser M, Tegenthoff M, Schwenkreis P: Influence of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor learning. Neurosci Lett 2009, 457:71-74.
• [10]Kim YH, Park JW, Ko MH, Jang SH, Lee PK: Facilitative effect of high frequency subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on complex sequential motor learning in humans. Neurosci Lett 2004, 367:181-185.
• [11]Ziemann U, Meintzschel F, Korchounov A, Ilic TV: Pharmacological modulation of plasticity in the human motor cortex. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006, 20:243-251.
• [12]Kimiskidis VK, Papagiannopoulos S, Kazis DA, Sotirakoglou K, Vasiliadis G, Zara F, Kazis A, Mills KR: Lorazepam-induced effects on silent period and corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res 2006, 173:603-611.
• [13]Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Meglio M, Cioni B, Tamburrini G, Tonali P, Rothwell JC: Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:794-799.
• [14]Butefisch CM, Davis BC, Wise SP, Sawaki L, Kopylev L, Classen J, Cohen LG: Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:3661-3665.
• [15]Schwenkreis P, Liepert J, Witscher K, Fischer W, Weiller C, Malin JP, Tegenthoff M: Riluzole suppresses motor cortex facilitation in correlation to its plasma level. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2000, 135:293-299.
• [16]Schwenkreis P, Witscher K, Pleger B, Malin JP, Tegenthoff M: The NMDA antagonist memantine affects training induced motor cortex plasticity–a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. BMC Neurosci 2005, 6:35. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Plewnia C, Hoppe J, Hiemke C, Bartels M, Cohen LG, Gerloff C: Enhancement of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability by the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine. Neurosci Lett 2002, 330:231-234.
• [18]Gilbert DL, Ridel KR, Sallee FR, Zhang J, Lipps TD, Wassermann EM: Comparison of the inhibitory and excitatory effects of ADHD medications methylphenidate and atomoxetine on motor cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 31:442-449.
• [19]Plewnia C, Hoppe J, Cohen LG, Gerloff C: Improved motor skill acquisition after selective stimulation of central norepinephrine. Neurology 2004, 62:2124-2126.
• [20]Zerbe RL, Rowe H, Enas GG, Wong D, Farid N, Lemberger L: Clinical pharmacology of tomoxetine, a potential antidepressant. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1985, 232:139-143.
• [21]Wong DT, Threlkeld PG, Best KL, Bymaster FP: A new inhibitor of norepinephrine uptake devoid of affinity for receptors in rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1982, 222:61-65.
• [22]Plewnia C, Hoppe J, Gerloff C: No effects of enhanced central norepinephrine on finger-sequence learning and attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006, 187:260-265.
• [23]Foster DJ, Good DC, Fowlkes A, Sawaki L: Atomoxetine enhances a short-term model of plasticity in humans. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006, 87:216-221.
• [24]Tsumoto T: Long-term potentiation and long-term depression in the neocortex. Prog Neurobiol 1992, 39:209-228.
• [25]Huang YZ, Chen RS, Rothwell JC, Wen HY: The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:1028-1032.
• [26]Teo JT, Swayne OB, Rothwell JC: Further evidence for NMDA-dependence of the after-effects of human theta burst stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:1649-1651.
• [27]Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC: Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 2004, 24:3379-3385.
• [28]Liepert J, Terborg C, Weiller C: Motor plasticity induced by synchronized thumb and foot movements. Exp Brain Res 1999, 125:435-439.
• [29]Berridge CW, Schmeichel BE, Espana RA: Noradrenergic modulation of wakefulness/arousal. Sleep Med Rev 2012, 16:187-197.
• [30]Brouwer B, Sale MV, Nordstrom MA: Asymmetry of motor cortex excitability during a simple motor task: relationships with handedness and manual performance. Exp Brain Res 2001, 138:467-476.
• [31]Daligadu J, Murphy B, Brown J, Rae B, Yielder P: TMS stimulus-response asymmetry in left- and right-handed individuals. Exp Brain Res 2013, 224:411-416.
• [32]Donders FC: On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1969, 30:412-431.
• [33]Lee L, Siebner HR, Rowe JB, Rizzo V, Rothwell JC, Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ: Acute remapping within the motor system induced by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 2003, 23:5308-5318.
• [34]Rounis E, Lee L, Siebner HR, Rowe JB, Friston KJ, Rothwell JC, Frackowiak RS: Frequency specific changes in regional cerebral blood flow and motor system connectivity following rTMS to the primary motor cortex. Neuroimage 2005, 26:164-176.
• [35]Mima T, Sadato N, Yazawa S, Hanakawa T, Fukuyama H, Yonekura Y, Shibasaki H: Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 10):1989-1997.
• [36]Graf H, Abler B, Freudenmann R, Beschoner P, Schaeffeler E, Spitzer M, Schwab M, Gron G: Neural correlates of error monitoring modulated by atomoxetine in healthy volunteers. Biol Psychiatry 2011, 69(9):890-897.
• [37]Lang N, Speck S, Harms J, Rothkegel H, Paulus W, Sommer M: Dopaminergic potentiation of rTMS-induced motor cortex inhibition. Biol Psychiatry 2008, 63:231-233.
• [38]Stokes MG, Chambers CD, Gould IC, Henderson TR, Janko NE, Allen NB, Mattingley JB: Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94:4520-4527.
• [39]List J, Kubke JC, Lindenberg R, Kulzow N, Kerti L, Witte V, Floel A: Relationship between excitability, plasticity and thickness of the motor cortex in older adults. Neuroimage 2013, 83:809-816.
• [40]Ugawa Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I: Motor cortex inhibition in patients with ataxia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 93:225-229.
• [41]Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M, Witscher K, Bornke C, Przuntek H, Malin JP, Schols L: Motor cortex activation by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ataxia patients depends on the genetic defect. Brain 2002, 125:301-309.
• [42]Schwenkreis P, Janssen F, Rommel O, Pleger B, Volker B, Hosbach I, Dertwinkel R, Maier C, Tegenthoff M: Bilateral motor cortex disinhibition in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I of the hand. Neurology 2003, 61:515-519.
• [43]Schwenkreis P, Scherens A, Ronnau AK, Hoffken O, Tegenthoff M, Maier C: Cortical disinhibition occurs in chronic neuropathic, but not in chronic nociceptive pain. BMC Neurosci 2010, 11:73. BioMed Central Full Text
• [44]Oldfield RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
• [45]Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W: Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1999, 52:97-103.
• [46]Ziemann U, Chen R, Cohen LG, Hallett M: Dextromethorphan decreases the excitability of the human motor cortex. Neurology 1998, 51:1320-1324.