Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Ana Marušić¹  Matko Marušić¹  Ana Jerončić¹  Mario Malički¹ 

[1] Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split, School of Medicine, Split, Croatia

关键词: Croatia;    Editorial policies;    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE);    Contribution disclosure form;    Guideline adherence;    Authorship;   

Others  :  1126347
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2288-12-189

 received in 2012-08-29, accepted in 2012-12-12,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

To assess how authors would describe their contribution to the submitted manuscript without reference to or requirement to satisfy authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), we analyzed responses of authors to an open-ended question “Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript?”.

Methods

Responses of authors (n=1425) who submitted their manuscripts (n=345) to the Croatian Medical Journal, an international general medical journal, from March 2009 until July 2010 were transcribed and matched to ICMJE criteria. Statements that could not be matched were separately categorized. Responses according to the number of authors or their byline position on the manuscript were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test and Moses test of extreme reactions.

Results

The number of authors per manuscript ranged from 1 to 26 (median=4, IQR=3-6), with the median of 2 contributions per author (IQR=2-3). Authors’ responses could be matched to the ICMJE criteria in 1116 (87.0%) cases. Among these, only 15.6% clearly declared contributions from all 3 ICMJE criteria; however, if signing of the authorship form was taken as the fulfillment of the third ICMJE criterion, overall fraction of deserving authorship was 54.2%. Non-ICMJE contributions were declared by 98 (7.6%) authors whose other contributions could be matched to ICMJE criteria, and by 116 (13.0%) authors whose contributions could not be matched to ICMJE criteria. The most frequently reported non-ICMJE contribution was literature review. Authors on manuscripts with more than 8 authors declared more contributions than those on manuscript with 8 or fewer authors: median 2, IQR 1–4, vs. median 2, IQR 1–3, respectively (Mann Whitney U test, p=0.001; Moses Test of Extreme Reactions, p<0.001). Almost a third of single authors (n=9; 31.0%) reported contributions that could not be matched to any ICMJE criterion.

Conclusions

In cases of multi-author collaborative efforts but not in manuscripts with fewer authors open-ended authorship declaration without instructions on ICMJE criteria elicited responses from authors that were similar to responses when ICMJE criteria were explicitly required. Current authorship criteria and the practice of contribution declaration should be revised in order to capture deserving authorship in biomedical research.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Malički et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Marusic A, Bosnjak L, Jeroncic A: A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One 2011, 6(9):e23477.
• [2]Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: authorship and contributorship. http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html webcite
• [3]Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, Thomas L, Kaner E, Stacy R, Pearson P, Vernon B, Rodgers H: The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a british medical faculty. BMJ 1997, 314(7086):1009-1012.
• [4]Pignatelli B, Maisonneuve H, Chapuis F: Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in french clinical settings. J Med Ethics 2005, 31(10):578-581.
• [5]Hren D, Sambunjak D, Ivanis A, Marusic M, Marusic A: Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience. J Med Ethics 2007, 33(7):428-432.
• [6]Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, Rennie D: Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 1998, 280(3):222-224.
• [7]Hwang SS, Song HH, Baik JH, Jung SL, Park SH, Choi KH, Park YH: Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International committee of medical journal editors. Radiology 2003, 226(1):16-23.
• [8]Bates T, Anic A, Marusic M, Marusic A: Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA 2004, 292(1):86-88.
• [9]Ilakovac V, Fister K, Marusic M, Marusic A: Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions. CMAJ 2007, 176(1):41-46.
• [10]Marusic A, Bates T, Anic A, Marusic M: How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal. Curr Med Res Opin 2006, 22(6):1035-1044.
• [11]Ivanis A, Hren D, Sambunjak D, Marusic M, Marusic A: Quantification of authors' contributions and eligibility for authorship: randomized study in a general medical journal. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23(9):1303-1310.
• [12]Ivanis A, Hren D, Marusic M, Marusic A: Less work, less respect: authors' perceived importance of research contributions and their declared contributions to research articles. PLoS One 2011, 6(6):e20206.
• [13]Hren D, Sambunjak D, Marusic M, Marusic A: Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study. Sci Eng Ethics 2012.
• [14]Bošnjak L, Marušić A: Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines. Scientometrics 2012, 93(3):751-763.
• [15]Walker RL, Sykes L, Hemmelgarn BR, Quan H: Authors' Opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment. BMC Med Educ 2010, 10:21. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Baerlocher MO, Gautam T, Newton M, Tomlinson G: Changing author counts in five major general medicine journals: effect of author contribution forms. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62(8):875-877.
• [17]McDonald RJ, Neff KL, Rethlefsen ML, Kallmes DF: Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends. Mayo Clin Proc 2010, 85(10):920-927.