期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Validation of PIN 3 physical activity survey in low-income overweight and obese young mothers
Susan Nitzke2  Ken Resnicow4  Dianne Ward3  Roger Brown5  Derek Hales3  Mei-Wei Chang1 
[1] Michigan State University, College of Nursing, 1355 Bogue Street, RM C346, East Lansing 48824, MI, USA;Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Linden Drive, Madison 53706, WI, USA;University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor 48104, Michigan, USA;University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison 53792, WI, USA
关键词: Low-income women;    Physical activity survey;    Validity;   
Others  :  1125878
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-015-1493-z
 received in 2014-09-03, accepted in 2015-01-29,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Existing physical activity surveys have not been validated for use with low-income overweight and obese young mothers. This study aimed to validate the Pregnancy Infection and Nutrition 3 (PIN3) physical activity survey and to explore whether its validity varied by race/ethnicity and body mass index (BMI) category when including or excluding child and adult care activities in the target population.

Methods

Participants were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and were asked to fill out the PIN3 survey and wear an Actigraph accelerometer. Validity was assessed (N = 42) using Spearman correlation coefficient.

Results

Regardless of inclusion or exclusion of child and adult care activity, the PIN3 survey showed evidence of validity for moderate (correlation coefficients 0.33 [p = 0.03]; 0.40 [p = 0.08]) but not vigorous (−0.01 [p = 0.91]; −0.06 [p = 0.69]) physical activity. The mean minutes per week spent in moderate, vigorous and moderate-vigorous physical activity measured by the PIN3 were substantially higher than when measured by accelerometer, for example, 588 (PIN3) versus 148 (accelerometer) minutes per week. Also, correlations between self-reported and objective monitored activity varied substantially by race/ethnicity and BMI category, for example, 0.29 (p = 0.18) for overweight women versus 0.57 (p = 0.007) for obese women; 0.27 (p = 0.20) for African American versus 0.66 (p = 0.001) for white.

Conclusions

The PIN3 survey may be adequate for many applications where quick and practical assessments are needed for moderate physical activity data in low-income overweight and obese young mothers. The substantial differences in mean minutes per week between the PIN3 and accelerometer may be due to over-reported physical activity by the study participants.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials Number: NCT01839708

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Chang et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150218020418102.pdf 351KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM: Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 2014, 311(8):806-14.
  • [2]Burke J-P, Williams K, Narayan K-M, Leibson C, Haffner S-M, Stern M-P: A population perspective on diabetes prevention: whom should we target for preventing weight gain? Diabetes Care 2003, 26(7):1999-2004.
  • [3]Preis SR, Pencina MJ, Mann DM, D'Agostino RB Sr, Savage PJ, Fox CS: Early-adulthood cardiovascular disease risk factor profiles among individuals with and without diabetes in the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2013, 36(6):1590-6.
  • [4]Koebnick C, Smith N, Huang K, Martinez MP, Clancy HA, Kushi LH: The prevalence of obesity and obesity-related health conditions in a large, multiethnic cohort of young adults in California. Ann Epidemiol 2012, 22(9):609-16.
  • [5]Bassett DR Jr, Wyatt HR, Thompson H, Peters JC, Hill JO: Pedometer-measured physical activity and health behaviors in U.S. adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42(10):1819-25.
  • [6]Parks SE, Housemann RA, Brownson RC: Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57(1):29-35.
  • [7]De Cocker KA, van Uffelen JG, Brown WJ: Associations between sitting time and weight in young adult Australian women. Prev Med 2010, 51(5):361-7.
  • [8]Lahjibi E, Heude B, Dekker JM, Hojlund K, Laville M, Nolan J, et al.: Impact of objectively measured sedentary behaviour on changes in insulin resistance and secretion over 3 years in the RISC study: interaction with weight gain. Diabetes Metab 2013, 39(3):217-25.
  • [9]Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE: Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 2003, 289(14):1785-91.
  • [10]Matthews CE, George SM, Moore SC, Bowles HR, Blair A, Park Y, et al.: Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors and cause-specific mortality in US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2012, 95(2):437-45.
  • [11]Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 2006, 174(6):801-9.
  • [12]How much physical activity do adults need? [http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/guidelines/adults.html]
  • [13]Schmidt MD, Freedson PS, Pekow P, Roberts D, Sternfeld B, Chasan-Taber L: Validation of the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey in pregnant women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38(1):42-50.
  • [14]Aittasalo M, Pasanen M, Fogelholm M, Ojala K: Validity and repeatability of a short pregnancy leisure time physical activity questionnaire. J Phys Act Health 2010, 7(1):109-18.
  • [15]Evenson KR, Wen F: Measuring physical activity among pregnant women using a structured one-week recall questionnaire: evidence for validity and reliability. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010, 7:21. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [16]Ainsworth BE, Irwin ML, Addy CL, Whitt MC, Stolarczyk LM: Moderate physical activity patterns of minority women: the Cross-Cultural Activity Participation Study. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 1999, 8(6):805-13.
  • [17]Collins BS, Miller YD, Marshall AL: Physical activity in women with young children: how can we assess “anything that's not sitting”? Women Health 2007, 45(2):95-116.
  • [18]Jones SA, Evenson KR, Johnston LF, Trost SG, Samuel-Hodge C, Jewell DA, et al.: Psychometric properties of the modified RESIDE physical activity questionnaire among low-income overweight women. J Sci Med Sport 2014, 18(1):37-42.
  • [19]Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T: Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health 2009, 6(6):790-804.
  • [20]Ferrari P, Friedenreich C, Matthews CE: The role of measurement error in estimating levels of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 2007, 166(7):832-40.
  • [21]Chang MW, Nitzke S, Brown R, Resnicow K: A community based prevention of weight gain intervention (Mothers In Motion) among young low-income overweight and obese mothers: design and rationale. BMC Public Health 2014, 14(1):280. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [22]Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P: Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32(9 Suppl):S442-9.
  • [23]Melanson EL Jr, Freedson PS: Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995, 27(6):934-40.
  • [24]Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M: Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40(1):181-8.
  • [25]StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 12 In College Station. StataCorp LP, Texas; 2011.
  • [26]Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al.: Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32(9 Suppl):S498-504.
  • [27]Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr, Tudor-Locke C, et al.: 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43(8):1575-81.
  • [28]Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M: A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008, 5:56. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [29]van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB: Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med 2010, 40(7):565-600.
  • [30]Helmerhorst HJ, Brage S, Warren J, Besson H, Ekelund U: A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012, 9:103. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [31]Buchowski MS, Townsend KM, Chen KY, Acra SA, Sun M: Energy expenditure determined by self-reported physical activity is related to body fatness. Obes Res 1999, 7(1):23-33.
  • [32]Walsh MC, Hunter GR, Sirikul B, Gower BA: Comparison of self-reported with objectively assessed energy expenditure in black and white women before and after weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 2004, 79(6):1013-9.
  • [33]Bell R, Tennant PW, McParlin C, Pearce MS, Adamson AJ, Rankin J, et al.: Measuring physical activity in pregnancy: a comparison of accelerometry and self-completion questionnaires in overweight and obese women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013, 170(1):90-5.
  • [34]Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, Moore CG, Cunningham JE, Fulton J, et al.: The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 2005, 161(4):389-98.
  • [35]Leenders NY, Sherman WM, Nagaraja HN: Energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry and doubly labeled water: do they agree? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38(12):2165-72.
  • [36]Altschuler A, Picchi T, Nelson M, Rogers JD, Hart J, Sternfeld B: Physical activity questionnaire comprehension: lessons from cognitive interviews. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009, 41(2):336-43.
  • [37]Oostdam N, van Mechelen W, van Poppel M: Validation and responsiveness of the AQuAA for measuring physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women. J Sci Med Sport 2012, 16(5):412-6.
  • [38]Chang M, Brown R, Nitzke S: Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9:424. BioMed Central Full Text
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次