Surgical assessment: measuring unobserved health

BMC Surgery

Jason M Sutherland¹  Nick Bansback⁴  Kevin Wing³  Trafford Crump² 

[1]Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

[2]Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Center for Clinical Effectiveness Research, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

[3]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

[4]School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

关键词: Longitudinal survey;    Health surveys;    Quality of life;    Health status;    Elective surgical procedures;    Secondary care;    Referral and consultation;    Access to health care;    Waiting lists;   

Others  :  1090578
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2482-15-4

 received in 2014-11-06, accepted in 2015-01-09,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The federal and provincial governments in Canada have invested an enormous amount of resources to measure, report and reduce surgical wait times. Yet these measures under-report the wait period that patients’ actually experience, because they do not capture the length of time a patient spends waiting to see the surgeon for a surgical assessment. This unmeasured time is referred to as the “wait one” (W1). Little is known about W1 and the effects that this has on patients’ health. Similarly, it is not understood whether patients waiting for surgical assessment actually want or need surgery. Existing administrative and clinical dataset do not capture information on health and decision-making while the patient is waiting for care form a specialist. The objective of this proposed study is to understand the impact that W1 for elective surgeries has on the health of patients and to determine whether this time can be reduced.

Methods/Design

A prospective survey design will be used to measure the health of patients waiting for surgical assessment. Working with the support of the surgical specialities in Vancouver Coastal Health, we will survey patients immediately after being referred for surgical assessment, and every four months thereafter, until they are seen by the surgeon.

Validated survey instruments will be used, including: generic and condition-specific health status questionnaires, pain and depression assessments. Other factors that will be measured include: patients’ knowledge about their condition, and their desired autonomy in the decision making process. We have piloted data collection in one surgical specialty in order to demonstrate feasibility.

Discussion

The results from this study will be used to quantify changes in patients’ health while they wait for surgical assessment. Based on this, policy- and decision-makers could design care interventions during W1, aimed at mitigating any negative health consequences associated with waiting. The results from this study will also be used to better understand whether there are factors that predict patients’ desire to proceed to surgery. These could be used to guide future research into experimenting with interventions to minimize inappropriate referrals and where they are best targeted.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Crump et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]The Commonwealth Fund: International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2012. 2012. Available from: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2012/Nov/1645_Squires_intl_profiles_hlt_care_systems_2012.pdf webcite
• [2]Prentice JC, Pizer SD: Waiting times and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Heal Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2007, 8(1):1-18. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10742-007-0024-5 webcite
• [3]Prentice JC, Pizer SD: Delayed access to health care and mortality. Health Serv Res 2007, 42(2):644-62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17362211 webcite
• [4]Ontario Medical Association: OMA principles and recommendations: models and processes of delivery for specialty care. 2011. Available from: https://www.oma.org/Resources/Documents/ModelsandProcessesofDeliveryforSpecialtyCare.pdf webcite
• [5]Badley EM, Canizares M, MacKay C, Mahomed NN, Davis AM: Surgery or consultation: a population-based cohort study of use of orthopaedic surgeon services. Scherer RW, editor. PLoS One 2013, 8(6):e65560. Public Library of Science; Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065560 webcite
• [6]Fitzgerald A, De Coster C, McMillan S, Naden R, Armstrong F, Barber A, et al.: Relative urgency for referral from primary care to rheumatologists: the Priority Referral Score. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011, 63(2):231-9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20890984 webcite
• [7]Morris K, Zelmer J, Johnson T: Wait times: a snapshot of what we know. Healthc Q 2006, 9(3):28-9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16826763 webcite
• [8]Fyie K, Frank C, Noseworthy T, Christiansen T, Marshall DA: Evaluating the primary-to-specialist referral system for elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Eval Clin Pract 2013, .:.. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004242 webcite
• [9]Thind A, Stewart M, Manuel D, Freeman T, Terry A, Chevendra V, et al.: What are wait times to see a specialist? An analysis of 26,942 referrals in Southwestern Ontario. Healthc Policy 2012, 8(1):80-91. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3430156/?tool=%2520pmcentrez webcite
• [10]Stainkey LA, Seidl IA, Johnson AJ, Tulloch GE, Pain T: The challenge of long waiting lists: how we implemented a GP referral system for non-urgent specialist’ appointments at an Australian Public Hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10(1):303-8. BioMed Central Ltd; Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/303 webcite BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS: Geography and the debate over medicare reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002, Suppl Web:W96-114. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12703563 webcite
• [12]O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB: Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: Shared decision making using patient decisions aids. Health Aff 2004, Web Exclus(October 7, 2004):Var 63-72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15471770 webcite
• [13]Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Wittink DR: Treatment Options in Knee Osteoarthritis. Arch Intern Med 2004, 164:1299-304.
• [14]Sirovich B, Gallagher PM, Wennberg DE, Fisher ES: Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. Health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008, 27(3):813-23. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18474975 webcite
• [15]Robinson A, Thomson R: Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Heal Care 2001, 10(Suppl I):i34-8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11533436 webcite
• [16]Hack T, Degner L, Watson P, Sinha L: Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006, 15(1):9-19.
• [17]Dolan P: The effect of experience of illness on health state valuations. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 49(5):551-64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8636729 webcite
• [18]Pereira C, Palta M, Mullahy J, Fryback D: Race and preference-based health-related quality of life measures in the United States. Qual Life Res 2011, 20(6):969-78.
• [19]EuroQoL Group: EQ-5D. 2011. Available from: http://www.euroqol.org/ webcite
• [20]Löwe B, Unützer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K: Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care 2004, 42(12):1194-201. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15550799 webcite
• [21]Stacey D, O’Connor AM, DeGrasse C, Verma S: Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher-risk women. Heal Expect 2003, 6(1):3-18. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00195.x/abstract;jsessionid=368FEFA8BFF71DA162EAD04D9152026A.f03t02 webcite
• [22]Man-Son-Hing M: A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999, 282(8):737. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=191331 webcite
• [23]O’Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G, et al.: A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 1998, 33(3):267-79. Elsevier; Available from: http://www.pec-journal.com/article/S0738-3991(98)00026 webcite-3/abstract
• [24]O’Connor AM: Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak 1995, 15:25-30.
• [25]Sturgis P, Allum N, Brunton-Smith I: Attitudes over time: the psychology of panel conditioning. In Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Edited by Lynn P. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.