Navigating uncharted territory: a qualitative study of the experience of transitioning to wheelchair use among older adults and their care providers

BMC Geriatrics

Roberta L. Woodgate³  William C. Miller²  Edward M. Giesbrecht¹ 

[1] Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Manitoba, R106-771 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg R3E 0T6, Manitoba, Canada;Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, T325-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver V6T 2B5, BC, Canada;Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg R3T 2N2, MB, Canada

关键词: Confidence;    Social support;    Training;    Participation;    Wheelchair;   

Others  :  1221659
DOI  :  10.1186/s12877-015-0092-2

 received in 2014-07-25, accepted in 2015-07-16,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

An increasing number of older adults are procuring a wheelchair for mobility; however, the corresponding impact on related injuries, caregiver burden, and participation restriction is concerning. To inform the development of a wheelchair training program, we pursued a clearer understanding of the experience transitioning to wheelchair use for older adult users and their care provider.

Methods

Six focus groups were conducted with older experienced wheelchair users (n = 10) and care providers (n = 4). Transcripts were analyzed using a Conventional Content approach; a coding framework enabled inductive theming and summary of the data.

Results

Three themes emerged from the user group: On My Own reflected both limited training and the necessity of venturing out, More Than Meets the Eye addressing barriers to use, and Interdependence between wheelchair users and the ambulatory community. Care provider responses fell into two themes: the All Encompassing impact of assumed responsibilities and Even the Best Laid Plans, where unpredictable and inaccessible environments sabotaged participation.

Conclusions

The transition from ambulatory to wheelchair mobility can feel like uncharted territory. Balanced support and appropriate mentorship are fundamentally important and real-world encounters optimize independence and proficiency with skills. The impact on care providers is extensive, highlighting the importance of skills training.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Giesbrecht et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Statistics Canada: Participation and activity limitation survey 2006: a profile of assistive technology for people with disabilities. Minister of Industry, Ottawa; 2008.
• [2]Mann WC, Llanes C, Justiss MD, Tomita M: Frail older adults’ self-report of their most important assistive device. Occup Ther J Res 2004, 24(1):4-12.
• [3]Shields M: Use of wheelchairs and other mobility support devices. Health Rep 2004, 15(3):37-41.
• [4]Chen T, Mann WC, Tomita M, Nochajski S: Caregiver involvement in the use of assistive devices by frail older persons. Occup Ther J Res 2000, 20(3):179-99.
• [5]Kaye H, Kang T, LaPlante HG: Mobility device use in the United States. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC; 2000.
• [6]Hoenig H, Taylor DH, Sloan FA: Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly? Am J Public Health 2003, 93(2):330-7.
• [7]Finlayson M, van Denend T: Experiencing the loss of mobility: perspectives of older adults with MS. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25(20):1168-80.
• [8]Turner Goins R, Jones J, Schure M, Rosenberg DE, Phelan EA, Dodson S, Jones DL. Older adults’ perceptions of mobility: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies. The Gerontologist 2014, Advance access published March 17, 2014, 1–15. doi:10.1093/geront/gnu014.
• [9]Laliberte-Rudman D, Hebert D, Reid D: Living in a restricted occupational world: the occupational experiences of stroke survivors who are wheelchair users and their caregivers. Can J Occup Ther 2006, 73(3):141-52.
• [10]Cranswick K, Dosman D: Eldercare: what we know today. Statistics Canada, Ottawa; 2008.
• [11]World Health Organization: Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2008.
• [12]Mortenson WB, Miller WC: The wheelchair procurement porcess: perspectives of clients and prescribers. Can J Occup Ther 2008, 75(3):167-175.
• [13]Kraskowsky LH, Finlayson M: Factors affecting older adults’ use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther 2001, 55(3):303-10.
• [14]Best KL, Routhier F, Miller WC: A description of manual wheelchair skills training: current practices in Canadian rehabilitation centers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2015, 10(5):393-400.
• [15]Kirby RL, Ackroyd-Stolarz SA, Brown MG, Kirkland SA, MacLeod DA: Wheelchair-related accidents caused by tips and falls among noninstitutionalized users of manually propelled wheelchairs in Nova Scotia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 73(5):319-30.
• [16]Gavin-Dreschnack D, Nelson A, Fitzgerald S, Harrow J, Sanchez-Anguiano A, Ahmed S, et al.: Wheelchair-related falls: current evidence and directions for improved quality care. J Nurs Care Qual 2005, 20(2):119-27.
• [17]Giesbrecht EM, Miller WC, Eng JJ, Mitchell IM, Woodgate RL, Goldsmith CH: Feasibilitiy of the Enhancing Participation In the Community by improving Wheelchair Skills (EPIC Wheels) program: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013, 14:350-361. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Giesbrecht EM, Miller WC, Mitchell IM, Woodgate RL: Development of a wheelchair skills home program for older adults using a participatory action design approach. BioMed Res Int 2014, 172434:1-13.
• [19]Whyte WF, Greenwood DJ, Lazes P: Participatory action research: through practice to science in social research. Am Behav Sci 1989, 32:513.
• [20]McLafferty I: Focus group interviews as a data collection strategy. J Adv Nurs 2004, 48(2):187-194.
• [21]Giesbrecht EM, Ripat JD, Cooper JE, Quanbury AO: Experiences with using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair for community-based occupations: a qualitative exploration. Can J Occup Ther 2011, 78(2):127-36.
• [22]Hsieh H, Shannon S: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2004, 15(9):1277-88.
• [23]Ripat J, Woodgate R: Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study. Spinal Cord 2012, 50(12):908-914.
• [24]Shea JB, Morgan RL: Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J Exp Psychol 1979, 5(2):179-187.
• [25]Hanlon RE: Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996, 77(8):811-815.
• [26]Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Eng JJ, Backman CL, Routhier F: Preliminary examination of the relation between participation and confidence in older manual wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013, 94(4):791-4.
• [27]Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ: Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. CAOT Publications ACE, Ottawa; 2007.
• [28]Cook A, Miller-Polgar J: Cook & Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practice. 3rd edition. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis; 2008.
• [29]Emerson RM: Social exchange theory. Annu Rev Sociol 1976, 2(1):335-362.
• [30]Lawler EJ, Thye SR: Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annu Rev Sociol 1999, 25(1):217-244.
• [31]Allen RES, Wiles JL: Receiving support when older: what makes it OK? Gerontologist 2013, 54(4):670-82.
• [32]Lewinter M: Reciprocities in caregiving relationships in Danish elder care. J Aging Stud 2003, 17(3):357-377.