Consent and assent in paediatric research in low-income settings

BMC Medical Ethics

Michael Parker¹  Phaik Yeong Cheah¹ 

[1] The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK

关键词: Children;    Low-income setting;    Paediatric research;    Assent;    Consent;   

Others  :  799569
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6939-15-22

 received in 2013-04-10, accepted in 2014-02-20,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In order to involve children in the decision-making process about participation in medical research it is widely recommended that the child’s assent be sought in addition to parental consent. However, the concept of assent is fraught with difficulties, resulting in confusion among researchers and ethics committees alike.

Discussion

In this paper, we outline the current international debate surrounding pediatric consent and assent, and its unique challenges arising in low-income settings. We go on to propose some key requirements for a fit-for-purpose assent model in these difficult settings. The paper recommends that children who are competent, that is, children who are judged to be able to understand and retain relevant information, weigh this information in making a mature judgment, come to a decision and communicate the decision, should be able to consent for themselves. Our proposal is that where the decision about whether to participate in a study is of comparable complexity to the decisions the child is used to making in other aspects of his or her life, it should be made by the child him or herself. The relevant level of complexity should be judged by local standards rather than standards of the developed world. In the paper we explore some of the practical challenges and counter arguments of implementing this proposal. As in high-income settings, we argue that in the case of children who are judged to lack this level of competence both parental consent and assent from the child should be sought and go on to define assent as involving the child to the extent compatible to his or her maturity and with cultural norms and not as obtaining the child’s permission to proceed.

Summary

The concept of assent in the current guidelines is confusing. There is an urgent need for clearer guidelines that can be adapted for all types of paediatric research wherever it is to be carried out and an evidence-base concerning good assent/consent practice. This paper argues that a context specific approach should be adopted when assessing whether consent or assent should be sought from children in low-income settings.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Cheah and Parker; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organisation: Global Health Observatory. 2013. [http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/mortality_under_five/en/index.html webcite]
• [2]Royal College of Paediatrics, Child Health: Ethics Advisory Committee: Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child 2000, 82:177-182.
• [3]Dondorp AM, Fanello CI, Hendriksen IC, Gomes E, Seni A, Chhaganlal KD, Bojang K, Olaosebikan R, Anunobi N, Maitland K, Kivaya E, Agbenyega T, Nguah SB, Evans J, Gesase S, Kahabuka C, Mtove G, Nadjm B, Deen J, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, Nansumba M, Karema C, Umulisa N, Uwimana A, Mokuolu OA, Adedoyin OT, Johnson WB, Tshefu AK, Onyamboko MA, Sakulthaew T, et al.: Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2010, 13:1647-1657.
• [4]Lwin KM, Phyo AP, Tarning J, Hanpithakpong W, Ashley EA, Lee SJ, Cheah P, Singhasivanon P, White NJ, Lindegårdh N, Nosten F: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of monthly versus bimonthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine chemoprevention in adults at high risk of malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012, 56:1571-15777.
• [5]US Department of Health and Human Services: Code of Federal Regulations. 2009. [Title 21 (Food and Drugs), Part 50 (Protection of Human Subjects)]. 2013. [http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=50&showFR=1 webcite]
• [6]Medical Research Council of South Africa: Guidelines on Ethics for Medical Research. 4th edition. [http://www.mrc.ac.za/ethics/ethicsbook1.pdf webcite]
• [7]Ministry of Health, Thailand: Thailand Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. [http://ird.sut.ac.th/newsite/Form/human/ICH_GCP_ThaiVer.pdf webcite]
• [8]Ministry of Health, Malaysia: Malaysian Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. 3rd edition. Malaysia; 2011.
• [9]UK Medical Research Council: MRC Ethics Guide: Medical research involving children. London; 2004. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002430 webcite
• [10]Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS): International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva; 2002. http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.htm webcite
• [11]Shaddy R, Denne S, the Committee on Drugs and Committee on Pediatric Research: Clinical Report – Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations. Pediatrics 2010, 125:850-860.
• [12]International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH): ICH Topic E 11 Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Paediatric Population. [http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002926.pdf webcite]
• [13]UK National Research Ethics Service: Guidance for Researchers and Reviewers: Information Sheets & Consent Forms. 2011. [http://www.nres.nhs.uk/applications/guidance/consent-guidance-and-forms/?1311929_entryid62=67013 webcite]
• [14]World Health Organisation Research Ethics Committee: The process of obtaining informed consent. [http://www.who.int/rpc/research_ethics/Process_seeking_IF_printing.pdf webcite]
• [15]Wendler D: Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations. J Med Ethics 2006, 32:229234.
• [16]World Medical Association: WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2013. [http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ webcite]
• [17]Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C: The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry 1982, 5:319-329.
• [18]Creed-Kanashiro H, Oré B, Scurrah M, Gil A, Penny A: Conducting research in developing countries: experiences of the informed consent process from community studies in Peru. J Nutr 2005, 135:925-928.
• [19]Lang T, Cheah PY, White NJ: Clinical research: time for sensible global guidelines. Lancet 2011, 377:1553-1555.
• [20]International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH): ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. E6 (R1). Current Step 4, Version dated 10 June 1996. [http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6_R1/Step4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdf webcite]
• [21]Baines P: Assent for children's participation in research is incoherent and wrong. Arch Dis Child 2011, 96:960-962.
• [22]Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2008.
• [23]Parikh SA: “They arrested me for loving a schoolgirl.” Ethnography, HIV, and a feminist assessment of the age of consent law as a gender-based structural intervention in Uganda. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74:1774-1782.
• [24]United Nations Children's Fund: The Convention of the Rights of the Child. 1990. [http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf webcite]
• [25]Wendler D, Shah S: Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research? Am J Bioeth 2003, 3:1-7.
• [26]Buchanan AE, Brock DW: Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
• [27]Rajaraman D, Jesuraj N, Geiter L, Bennett S, Grewal HM, Vaz M: How participatory is parental consent in low literacy rural settings in low income countries? Lessons learned from a community-based study of infants in South India. BMC Med Ethics 2011, 12:3-9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [28]Sibley A, Sheehan M, Pollard AJ: Assent is not consent. J Med Ethics 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100317
• [29]Wilkinson D: Dissent about assent in paediatric research. J Med Ethics 2011, 38:1.
• [30]Roth-Cline M, Nelson RM: Parental permission and child assent in research on children. Yale J Bio Med 2013, 86:291-301.
• [31]Molyneux CS, Peshu N, Marsh K: Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan Coast. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59:2547-2559.