期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
The relationship of women’s status and empowerment with skilled birth attendant use in Senegal and Tanzania
Jessica D. Gipson1  Kyoko Shimamoto1 
[1] Fielding School of Public Health, Center for Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Dr. South, 16-035, Los Angeles 90095-1772, CA, USA
关键词: Sub-Saharan Africa;    Cross-national study;    Women’s empowerment;    Women’s status;    Skilled birth attendant;    Delivery;    Maternal mortality;   
Others  :  1221106
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-015-0591-3
 received in 2014-12-16, accepted in 2015-07-14,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Maternal mortality remains unacceptably high in sub-Saharan Africa with 179,000 deaths occurring each year, accounting for 2-thirds of maternal deaths worldwide. Progress in reducing maternal deaths and increasing Skilled Birth Attendant (SBA) use at childbirth has stagnated in Africa. Although several studies demonstrate the important influences of women’s status and empowerment on SBA use, this evidence is limited, particularly in Africa. Furthermore, few studies empirically test the operationalization of women’s empowerment and incorporate multidimensional measures to represent the potentially disparate influence of women’s status and empowerment on SBA use across settings.

Methods

This study examined the relationship of women’s status and empowerment with SBA use in two African countries – Senegal and Tanzania – using the 2010 Demographic and Health Surveys (weighted births n = 10,688 in SN; 6748 in TZ). Factor analysis was first conducted to identify the structure and multiple dimensions of empowerment. Then, a multivariate regression analysis was conducted to examine associations between these empowerment dimensions and SBA use.

Results

Overall, women’s status and empowerment were positively related to SBA use. Some sociodemographic characteristics showed similar effects across countries (e.g., age, wealth, residence, marital relationship, parity); however, women’s status and empowerment influence SBA use differently by setting. Namely, women’s education directly and positively influenced SBA use in Tanzania, but not in Senegal. Further, each of the dimensions of empowerment influenced SBA use in disparate ways. In Tanzania women’s higher household decision-making power and employment were related to SBA use, while in Senegal more progressive perceptions of gender norms and older age at first marriage were related to SBA use.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence of the disparate influences of women’s status and empowerment on SBA use across settings. Results indicate that efforts to increase SBA use and to reduce maternal mortality through the improvement of women’s status and empowerment should focus both on improving girls’ education and delaying marriage, as well as transforming gender norms and decision-making power. However, given the multi-dimensional and contextual nature of women’s status and empowerment, it is critical to identify key drivers to increase SBA use in a given setting for contextually tailored policy and programming.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Shimamoto and Gipson.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150727021854656.pdf 468KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. WHO, Geneva; 2014.
  • [2]Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled birth attendant : a joint statement of WHO, ICM, and FIGO. WHO, Geneva; 2004.
  • [3]Graham WJ, Bell JS, Bullough CH. Can skilled attendance at delivery reduce maternal mortality in developing countries. Safe Motherhood Strategies: a Review of the Evidence. 2001; 17:97-130.
  • [4]Nations U. The Milennium Development Goals Report 2014. United Nations, New York; 2014.
  • [5]Koblinsky M, Matthews Z, Hussein J, Mavalankar D, Mridha MK, Anwar I, Achadi E, Adjei S, Padmanabhan P, van Lerberghe W et al.. Maternal Survival 3 - Going to scale with professional skilled care. Lancet. 2006; 368(9544):1377-1386.
  • [6]Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk - maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(8):1091-1110.
  • [7]Mason E, McDougall L, Lawn JE, Gupta A, Claeson M, Pillay Y, Presern C, Lukong MB, Mann G, Wijnroks M. From evidence to action to deliver a healthy start for the next generation. Lancet. 2014; 384(9941):455-467.
  • [8]Requejo JH, Bryce J, Barros AJ, Berman P, Bhutta Z, Chopra M, Daelmans B, de Francisco A, Lawn J, Maliqi B. Countdown to 2015 and beyond: fulfilling the health agenda for women and children. Lancet. 2014; 385(9966):466-76.
  • [9]Kabeer N, McFadden P, Arnfred S, Dominguez E, Saaadallah S. Discussing women's empowerment - theory and practice. Sida studies no.3.. Sida, Stockholm; 2001.
  • [10]Malhotra A, Shuler SR, Boender C. Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. In: World Bank workshop on poverty and gender: New perspectives. Washington, DC: 2002.
  • [11]Safilios-Rothschild C. Female power autonomy and demographic change in the Third World. Women’s roles and population trends in the Third World. Anker R, Buvinic M, Youssef NH, editors. Routledge, London; 1982.
  • [12]Upadhyay UD, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, Ciaraldi EJ, Fraser A, Huchko MJ, Prata N. Women’s empowerment and fertility: A review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 115:111-120.
  • [13]Hindin M. The Influence of Women's Early Childbearing on Subsequent Empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa: A Cross-National Meta Analysis. International Center for Research on Women Fertility & Empowerment Working Paper Series. 2012.003-2012.
  • [14]Kishor S, Subaiya L. Understanding women’s empowerment: a comparative analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data. DHS Comparative Reports No. 20. Macro International, Maryland; 2008.
  • [15]Pandey S, Lama G, Lee H. Effect of women’s empowerment on their utilization of health services: A case of Nepal. Int Soc Work. 2012; 55(4):554-573.
  • [16]Upadhyay UD, Karasek D. Womens empowerment and achievement of desired fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. DHS working papers. No.80. 2010.
  • [17]Blumberg RL. A General Theory of Gender Stratification. Sociol Theory. 1984; 2:23-101.
  • [18]Babalola S, Fatusi A. Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria - looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9(1):43. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [19]Kitui J, Lewis S, Davey G. Factors influencing place of delivery for women in Kenya: an analysis of the Kenya demographic and health survey, 2008/2009. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13(1):40. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Ochako R, Fotso J-C, Ikamari L, Khasakhala A. Utilization of maternal health services among young women in Kenya: Insights from the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011; 11(1):1. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [21]Zere E, Oluwole D, Kirigia J, Mwikisa C, Mbeeli T. Inequities in skilled attendance at birth in Namibia: A decomposition analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011; 11(1):34. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [22]Ahmed S, Creanga AA, Gillespie DG, Tsui AO. Economic Status, Education and Empowerment: Implications for Maternal Health Service Utilization in Developing Countries. Plos One. 2010; 5(6):e11190.
  • [23]Singh K, Bloom S, Brodish P. Influence of gender measures on maternal and child health in Africa. MEASURE Evaluation Technical Report 66 2011.
  • [24]Woldemicael G, Tenkorang EY. Women’s Autonomy and Maternal Health-Seeking Behavior in Ethiopia. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14(6):988-998.
  • [25]Woldemicael G. Do women with higher autonomy seek more maternal health care? Evidence from Eritrea and Ethiopia. Health Care Women Int. 2010; 31(7):599-620.
  • [26]Jayaraman A, Chandrasekhar S, Gebreselassie T. DHS WORKING PAPERS: Factors Affecting Maternal Health Care Seeking Behavior in Rwanda. No. 59. 2008.
  • [27]Shiffman J. Can poor countries surmount high maternal mortality? Stud Fam Plann. 2000; 31(4):274-289.
  • [28]Singh K, Bloom S, Brodish P. Gender equality as a means to improve maternal and child health in Africa. Health Care Women Int. 2013; 36(1):57-69.
  • [29]Singh K, Bloom S, Haney E, Olorunsaiye C, Brodish P. Gender factors and facility delivery: Nigeria and MDG5. Afr J Reprod Health. 2012; 16:122-128.
  • [30]Austin A, Fapohunda B, Langer A, Orobaton N. Trends in delivery with no one present in nigeria between 2003 and 2013. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2015; 7:345.
  • [31]Do M, Kurimoto N. Women’s Empowerment and Choice of Contraceptive Methods in Selected African Countries. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 38(1):23-33.
  • [32]Pallitto CC, O’Campo P. Community level effects of gender inequality on intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy in Colombia: testing the feminist perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60(10):2205-2216.
  • [33]Agarwala R, Lynch SM. Refining the measurement of women’s autonomy: An international application of a multi-dimensional construct. Soc Forces. 2006; 84(4):2077-2098.
  • [34]Snow RC, Winter RA, Harlow SD. Gender Attitudes and Fertility Aspirations among Young Men in Five High Fertility East African Countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2013; 44(1):1-24.
  • [35]Fotso J-C, Ezeh AC, Essendi H. Maternal health in resource-poor urban settings: how does women’s autonomy influence the utilization of obstetric care services. Reprod Health. 2009; 6(9):1-8.
  • [36]Enquete Demographique et de Sante a Indicateurs Multiples au Senegal (EDS-MICS) [DHS Senegal] 2010–2011. ANSD et ICF International, Maryland; 2011.
  • [37]Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 2010. Dar es Salaam. NBS and ICF Macro, Dar es Salaam; 2011.
  • [38]UN statistics division. World Satistics Pocketbook, 2013 edition. In.; 2013.
  • [39]Croll EJ. Women in Rural Production and Reproduction in the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, and Tanzania: Socialist Development Experiences. Signs. 1981; 7(2):361-374.
  • [40]McCloskey LA, Williams C, Larsen U. Gender inequality and intimate partner violence among women in Moshi, Tanzania. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2005; 31(3):124-130.
  • [41]Larsen U, Hollos M. Women’s empowerment and fertility decline among the Pare of Kilimanjaro region, Northern Tanzania. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57(6):1099-1115.
  • [42]Faye SL. Devenir mère au Sénégal: des expériences de maternité entre inégalités sociales et défaillances des services de santé. Cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones/Santé. 2008; 18(3):175-183.
  • [43]Faye A, Faye M, Bâ I, Ndiaye P, Tal-Dia A. Facteurs déterminant le lieu d’accouchement chez des femmes ayant bénéficié au moins d’une consultation prénatale dans une structure sanitaire (Sénégal). Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2010; 58(5):323-329.
  • [44]Sieveking N. ‘We don’t want equality; we want to be given our rights’: Muslim women negotiating global development concepts in Senegal. Afr Spectr. 2007; 42:29-48.
  • [45]Patterson A. The impact of Senegal’s decentralization on women in local governance. Canadian Journal of African Studies/La Revue canadienne des etudes africaines. 2002; 36(3):490-529.
  • [46]Fuse K. Cross-national variation in attitudinal measures of gender preference for children: An examination of Demographic and Health Surveys from 40 countries. DHS Working Papers No 44 2008.
  • [47]Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Sage; 2003
  • [48]Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000; 56(2):645-646.
  • [49]UNESCO&UNICEF. Non-formal Education as a Means to Meet Learning Needs of Out-of-school Children and Adolescents. In.; 2014.
  • [50]Sipsma H, Ofori-Atta A, Canavan M, Udry C, Bradley E. Empowerment and use of antenatal care among women in Ghana: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14(1):364. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [51]Coast E, Jones E, Lattof SR, Portela A. Integrating culture into maternity care programmes: a systematic mapping of interventions. Maternal Health Task Force 2015.
  • [52]Mumtaz Z, Salway S. Understanding gendered influences on women’s reproductive health in Pakistan: Moving beyond the autonomy paradigm. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(7):1349-1356.
  • [53]WHO guideline on preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive health outcomes among adolescents in developing countries. WHO, Geneva; 2011.
  • [54]Lee‐Rife S, Malhotra A, Warner A, Glinski AM. What works to prevent child marriage: A review of the evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2012; 43(4):287-303.
  • [55]Magadi MA, Agwanda AO, Obare FO. A comparative analysis of the use of maternal health services between teenagers and older mothers in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). Soc Sci Med. 2007; 64(6):1311-1325.
  • [56]Bearinger LH, Sieving RE, Ferguson J, Sharma V. Global perspectives on the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents: patterns, prevention, and potential. Lancet. 2007; 369(9568):1220-1231.
  • [57]Neal S, Matthews Z, Frost M, Fogstad H, Camacho AV, Laski L. Childbearing in adolescents aged 12–15 years in low resource countries: a neglected issue. New estimates from demographic and household surveys in 42 countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(9):1114-1118.
  • [58]Kabeer N. Women, Wages and Intra‐household Power Relations in Urban Bangladesh. Dev Chang. 1997; 28(2):261-302.
  • [59]Mood C. Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. Eur Sociol Rev. 2010; 26(1):67-82.
  • [60]Bearinger LH, Sieving RE, Ferguson J, Sharma V. Adolescent health 2 - Global perspectives on the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents: patterns, prevention, and potential. Lancet. 2007; 369(9568):1220-1231.
  • [61]Wellings K, Collumbien M, Slaymaker E, Singh S, Hodges Z, Patel D, Bajos N. Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective. Lancet. 2006; 368(9548):1706-1728.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:9次