UK women’s experiences of breastfeeding and additional breastfeeding support: a qualitative study of Baby Café services

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Mary Newburn¹  Sarah McMullen¹  Rebekah Fox¹ 

[1] NCT, Alexandra House, Oldham Terrace, London W3 6NH, UK

关键词: Breastfeeding role models;    Social support;    Expert support;    Unrealistic expectations;    Women’s experiences;    Baby Café;    Breastfeeding support;    Breastfeeding;   

Others  :  1219958
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-015-0581-5

 received in 2015-02-16, accepted in 2015-06-24,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Whilst 81 % of UK women initiate breastfeeding, there is a steep decline in breastfeeding rates during the early postnatal period, with just 55 % of women breastfeeding at six weeks. 80 % of these women stopped breastfeeding sooner than they intended, with women citing feeding difficulties and lack of adequate support. As part of efforts to increase breastfeeding continuation rates, many public and voluntary organisations offer additional breastfeeding support services, which provide practical support in the early postnatal period and beyond. This paper focuses on the qualitative experiences of UK users of Baby Café services to examine their experiences of breastfeeding and breastfeeding support.

Methods

The study was based upon in-depth interviews and focus groups with users of eight Baby Café breastfeeding support groups across the UK. Thirty-six interviews and five focus groups were conducted with a total of fifty-one mothers using the service. Interviews and group discussions were analysed using N Vivo software to draw out key themes and discussions.

Results

Whilst each mother’s infant feeding journey is unique, reflecting her own personal circumstances and experiences, several themes emerged strongly from the data. Many women felt that they had been given unrealistic expectations of breastfeeding by professionals keen to promote the benefits. This left them feeling unprepared when they encountered pain, problems and relentlessness of early infant feeding, leading to feelings of guilt and inadequacy over their feeding decisions. Mothers valued the combination of expert professional and peer support provided by Baby Café services and emphasised the importance of social support from other mothers in enabling them to continue feeding for as long as they wished.

Conclusions

The research emphasises the need for realistic rather than idealistic antenatal preparation and the importance of timely and parent-centred breastfeeding support, particularly in the immediate postnatal weeks. The findings suggest that effective social support, combined with reassurance and guidance from skilled practitioners, can help women to overcome difficulties and find confidence in their own abilities to achieve their feeding goals. However, further work is needed to make sure such services are readily accessible to women from all sectors of the community.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Fox et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. WHO, Geneva; 2003.
• [2]McAndrew F, Thompson J, Fellows L, Large A, Speed M, Renfrew MJ. Infant feeding survey 2010. Leeds, Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2012.
• [3]Lande B, Andersen LF, Baerug A et al.. Infant feeding practices and associated factors in the first 6 months of life: The Norwegian infant nutrition survey. Acta Paediatr. 2003; 92(2):152-161.
• [4]Sveriges Officiella Statistik och Socialstyrelsen. Amning och föräldrars rökvanor. Barn födda 2007 [Breastfeeding and smoking among parents of infants born in 2010]. Stockholm, Sweden: Sveriges Officiella Statistik; 2009. Available from:. https://www. socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/18809/2012-8-13.pdf webcite
• [5]Kelleher CM. The physical challenges of early breastfeeding. Social Science & Medicine. 2007; 63(10):2727-2738.
• [6]Redshaw M, Henderson J. Learning the hard way: expectations and experiences of infant feeding support. Birth. 2012; 39:21-29.
• [7]Brown AE, Raynor P, Benton D, Lee MD. Indices of Multiple Deprivation predict breastfeeding duration in England and Wales. The European Journal of Public Health. 2010; 20(2):231-235.
• [8]Hoddinott P, Pill R. Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London. BMJ. 1999; 318(7175):30-34.
• [9]Pain R, Bailey C, Mowl G. Infant feeding in North East England: Contested spaces of reproduction. Area. 2001; 33(3):261-272.
• [10]Brown A, Raynor P, Lee M. Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ perceptions of factors that influence decisions to breastfeed or formula feed infants: a comparative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011; 67(9):1993-2003.
• [11]Condon L, Rhodes C, Warren S, Withall J, Tapp A. But is it a normal thing? Teenage mothers experiences of breastfeeding promotion and support. Health Education Journal. 2013; 72:156-162.
• [12]Lee EJ. Infant feeding in risk society. Health, Risk 7 Society. 2007; 9(3):295-309.
• [13]McInnes RJ, Hoddinott P, Britten J, Darwent K, Craig LC. Significant others, situations and infant feeding behaviour change processes: a serial qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013; 13(1):114. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Marshall JL, Godfrey M, Renfrew MJ. Being a ‘good mother’: managing breastfeeding and merging identities. Social Science & Medicine. 2007; 65(10):2147-2159.
• [15]Trickey H, Newburn M. Goals, dilemmas and assumptions in infant feeding education and support. Applying theory of constraints thinking tools to develop new priorities for action. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2014; 10:72-91.
• [16]Mahon-Daly P, Andrews GJ. Liminality and breastfeeding: women negotiating space and two bodies. Health & Place. 2002; 8(2):61-76.
• [17]Schmied V, Lupton D. Blurring the boundaries: breastfeeding and maternal subjectivity. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2001; 23(2):234-250.
• [18]Larsen JS, Hall EO, Aagaard H. Shattered expectations: when mothers’ confidence in breastfeeding is undermined–a metasynthesis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2008; 22(4):653-661.
• [19]Lee E. Living with risk in the age of ‘intensive motherhood’: Maternal identity and infant feeding. Health, Risk & Society. 2008; 10(5):467-477.
• [20]Faircloth CR. ‘If they want to risk the health and well-being of their child, that's up to them’: Long-term breastfeeding, risk and maternal identity. Health, Risk & Society. 2010; 12(4):357-367.
• [21]Hoddinott, P., Craig, L. C., Britten, J., & McInnes, R. M. A serial qualitative interview study of infant feeding experiences: idealism meets realism, BMJ Open. 2012;2(2):e000504. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000504.
• [22]UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative. The Baby Friendly Initiative. 2012. Available at. www. babyfriendly.org.uk webcite
• [23]Dykes F, Flacking R. Encouraging breastfeeding: a relational perspective. Early Human Development. 2010; 86(11):733-736.
• [24]Jolly K, Ingram L, Khan KS, Deeks JJ, Freemantle N, MacArthur C. Systematic review of peer support for breastfeeding continuation: metaregression analysis of the effect of setting, intensity, and timing. BMJ. 2012; 344:d8287.
• [25]Ingram J. A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: Mothers', midwives' and peer supporters' views and the effects on breastfeeding. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013; 13:192. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Hoddinott P, Britten J, Pill R. Why do interventions work in some places and not others: A breastfeeding support group trial. Social Science & Medicine. 2009; 70(5):769-778.
• [27]Hoddinott P, Craig L, Maclennan G, Boyers D, Vale L. Process evaluation for the FEeding Support Team (FEST) randomised controlled feasibility trial of proactive and reactive telephone support for breastfeeding women living in disadvantaged areas. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(2): Article ID e001039
• [28]Hoddinott P, Seyara R, Marais D. Global evidence synthesis and UK idiosyncrasy: why have recent UK trials had no significant effects on breastfeeding rates? Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2011; 7(3):221-227.
• [29]Renfrew MJ, McCormick FM, Wade A, Quinn B, Dowswell T. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2012;5.
• [30]Hoddinott P, Chalmers M, Pill R. One‐to‐One or Group‐Based Peer Support for Breastfeeding? Women's Perceptions of a Breastfeeding Peer Coaching Intervention. Birth. 2006; 33(2):139-146.
• [31]Oakley LL, Henderson J, Redshaw M, Quigley MA. The role of support and other factors in early breastfeeding cessation: an analysis of data from a maternity survey in England. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:88. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Kervin BE, Kemp L, Pulver LJ. Types and timing of breastfeeding support and its impact on mothers' behaviours. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2010; 46(3):85-91.
• [33]Chung M, Raman G, Trikalinos T, Lau J, Ip S. Interventions in primary care to promote breastfeeding: An evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008; 149(8):565-582.
• [34]Hoddinott P, Britten J, Prescott G, Tappin D, Ludbrook A, Godden D. Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2009; 338:3026.
• [35]Bazeley P, Jackson K. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications Limited. 2013.
• [36]Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. Sage, London; 2013.
• [37]Sheehan A, Schmied V, Barclay L. Complex decisions: Theorizing women’s infant feeding decisions in the first 6 weeks after birth. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010; 66(2):371-380.
• [38]Ryan K, Bissell P, Alexander J. Moral work in women's narratives of breastfeeding. Social Science & Medicine. 2010; 70(6):951-958.
• [39]Dykes F. ‘Supply’ and ‘demand’: breastfeeding as labour. Social Science & Medicine. 2005; 60(10):2283-2293.
• [40]McInnes RJ, Chambers JA. Supporting breastfeeding mothers: qualitative synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 62(4):407-427.
• [41]Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, McCourt C, Dykes F. Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: A metasynthesis. Birth. 2011; 38(1):49-60.
• [42]Bourdieu P. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; 1984.