How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care: a qualitative study

BMC Health Services Research

Diana MJ Delnoij³  Anneke L Francke¹  Brigitte BJM de Brouwer²  Renate AMM Kieft² 

[1] 2/ EMGO+/VU medical center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Dutch Nurses’ Association, PO Box 8212, 3503, RE Utrecht, The Netherlands;Professor of Transparency in Healthcare from the Patient's Perspective, Tranzo, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands

关键词: Nursing work environment;    Nurses;    Quality improvement;    Patient experiences;   

Others  :  1130825
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-249

 received in 2013-11-06, accepted in 2014-06-06,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Healthcare organisations monitor patient experiences in order to evaluate and improve the quality of care. Because nurses spend a lot of time with patients, they have a major impact on patient experiences. To improve patient experiences of the quality of care, nurses need to know what factors within the nursing work environment are of influence. The main focus of this research was to comprehend the views of Dutch nurses on how their work and their work environment contribute to positive patient experiences.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative research design was used to collect data. Four focus groups were conducted, one each with 6 or 7 registered nurses in mental health care, hospital care, home care and nursing home care. A total of 26 nurses were recruited through purposeful sampling. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis.

Results

The nurses mentioned essential elements that they believe would improve patient experiences of the quality of nursing care: clinically competent nurses, collaborative working relationships, autonomous nursing practice, adequate staffing, control over nursing practice, managerial support and patient-centred culture. They also mentioned several inhibiting factors, such as cost-effectiveness policy and transparency goals for external accountability. Nurses feel pressured to increase productivity and report a high administrative workload. They stated that these factors will not improve patient experiences of the quality of nursing care.

Conclusions

According to participants, a diverse range of elements affect patient experiences of the quality of nursing care. They believe that incorporating these elements into daily nursing practice would result in more positive patient experiences. However, nurses work in a healthcare context in which they have to reconcile cost-efficiency and accountability with their desire to provide nursing care that is based on patient needs and preferences, and they experience a conflict between these two approaches. Nurses must gain autonomy over their own practice in order to improve patient experiences.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kieft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organization: The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. 2000, Chapter 2: 31-35.
• [2]Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, Richards N, Chandola T: Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002, 11(4):335-339.
• [3]Suhonen R, Papastavrou E, Efstathiou G, Tsangari H, Jarosova D, Leino-Kilpi H, Patiraki E, Karlou C, Balogh Z, Merkouris A: Patient satisfaction as an outcome of individualised nursing care. Scand J Caring Sci 2012, 26(2):372-380.
• [4]Giordano LA, Elliott MN, Goldstein E, Lehrman WG, Spencer PA: Development, implementation, and public reporting of the HCAHPS survey. Med Care Res Rev 2010, 67(1):27-37.
• [5]Delnoij DM: Measuring patient experiences in Europe: what can we learn from the experiences in the USA and England? Eur J Public Health 2009, 19(4):354-356.
• [6]Framework for quality indicators: A framework for the development and management of quality indicators for the Dutch Health Care Transparency Programme. http://www.zichtbarezorg.nl/mailings/FILES/htmlcontent/Programma%20Zichtbare%20Zorg/DEF_Framework%20for%20quality%20indicators_EN.pdf webcite
• [7]Rademakers J, Delnoij D, de Boer D: Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality? BMJ Quality & Safety 2011, 20(4):326-331.
• [8]Damman OC, Hendriks M, Sixma HJ: Towards more patient centred healthcare: A new Consumer Quality Index instrument to assess patients’ experiences with breast care. Eur J Cancer 2009, 45(9):1569-1577.
• [9]Bridges J, Flatley M, Meyer J: Older people's and relatives’ experiences in acute care settings: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Nurs Stud 2010, 47(1):89-107.
• [10]Attree M: Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and perspectives of ‘good’ and ‘not so good’ quality care. J Adv Nurs 2001, 33(4):456-466.
• [11]Our mission and values. http://www.pickereurope.org/our-mission-and-values.html webcite
• [12]Zuiddijk M: Measuring and improving the quality of care from the healthcare user perspective: the Consumer Quality Index. Tilburg: Tilburg University; 2011.
• [13]Triemstra M, Winters S, Kool RB, Wiegers TA: Measuring client experiences in long-term care in the Netherlands: a pilot study with the Consumer Quality Index Long-term Care. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10(1):95. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Mainz J: Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003, 15(6):523-530.
• [15]Hendriks M, Spreeuwenberg P, Rademakers J, Delnoij D: Dutch healthcare reform: did it result in performance improvement of health plans? A comparison of consumer experiences over time. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9(1):167. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Westbrook J, Duffield C, Li L, Creswick N: How much time do nurses have for patients? A longitudinal study quantifying hospital nurses' patterns of task time distribution and interactions with health professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11(1):319. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Teng CI, Hsiao FJ, Chou TA: Nurse-perceived time pressure and patient-perceived care quality. J Nurs Manag 2010, 18(3):275-284.
• [18]Kutney-Lee A, McHugh MD, Sloane DM, Cimiotti JP, Flynn L, Neff DF, Aiken LH: Nursing: a key to patient satisfaction. Health Aff 2009, 28(4):w669-w677.
• [19]McHugh MD, Kutney-Lee A, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Aiken LH: Nurses’ widespread job dissatisfaction, burnout, and frustration with health benefits signal problems for patient care. Health Aff 2011, 30(2):202-210.
• [20]Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Van den Heede K, Sloane DM, Busse R, McKee M, Bruyneel L, Rafferty AM, Griffiths P, Moreno-Casbas MT, Tishelman C, Scott A, Brzostek T, Kinnunen J, Schwendimann R, Heinen M, Zikos D, Sjetne IS, Smith HL, Kutney-Lee A: Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. BMJ 2012., 344
• [21]Disch J: Creating healthy work environments. Creat Nurse 2002, 8(2):3-4.
• [22]Kramer M, Schmalenberg C: Staff nurses identify essentials of magnetism. In Magnet hospitals revisited: Attraction and retention of professional nurses Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. 2nd edition. Edited by McClure ML, Hinshaw AS. Washington DC: American Nurses Association; 2002:25-59.
• [23]McClure ML, Poulin MA, Sovie MD AWM: Magnet Hospitals: Attraction and Retention of Professional Nurses (The original study). In Magnet Hospitals Revisited: Attraction and Retention of Professional Nurses. 2nd edition. Edited by McClure ML, Hinshaw AS. Washington DC: American Nurses Association; 2002:1-24.
• [24]Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Lake ET, Sochalski J, Weber AL: Organization and outcomes of inpatient AIDS care. Med Care 1999, 37(8):760-772.
• [25]Aiken LH: Superior outcomes for Magnet Hospitals: The Evidence Base. In Magnet Hospitals Revisited: Attraction and Retention of Professional Nurses. 2nd edition. Edited by McClure ML, Hinshaw AS. Washington DC: American Nurses Association; 2002:61-81.
• [26]Gardner JK, Thomas-Hawkins C, Fogg L, Latham CE: The relationship between nurses' perceptions of the hemodialysis unit work environment and nurse turnover, patient satisfaction, and hospitalizations. Nephrol Nurs J 2007, 34(3):271.
• [27]Enthoven AC, van de Ven WP: Going Dutch—managed-competition health insurance in the Netherlands. N Engl J Med 2007, 357(24):2421-2423.
• [28]Helderman JK, Schut FT, van der Grinten TE, van de Ven WP: Market-oriented health care reforms and policy learning in the Netherlands. J Health Polit Policy Law 2005, 30(1–2):189-209.
• [29]Velden LFJ, Francke AL, Batenburg RS: Vraag- en aanbodontwikkelingen in de verpleging en verzorging in Nederland: een kennissynthese van bestaande literatuur en gegevensbronnen. Nederlands Instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg 2011.
• [30]Mistiaen P, Kroezen M, Triemstra M, Francke AL: Verpleegkundigen en verzorgenden in internationaal perspectief. Een literatuurstudie naar rollen en posities van beroepsbeoefenaren in de verpleging en verzorging. Nederlands Instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg (NIVEL) 2011.
• [31]Holloway I, Wheeler S: Qualitative Research in Nursing. 2nd edition. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2002.
• [32]Creswell JW: Research design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Vol. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage publication; 2003.
• [33]Shaller D: Patient-centered care: what does it take? The Commonwealth Fund 2007.
• [34]Tawfik-Shukor AR, Klazinga NS, Arah OA: Comparing health system performance assessment and management approaches in the Netherlands and Ontario, Canada. BMC Health Serv Res 2007, 7(1):25. BioMed Central Full Text
• [35]Arah OA, Klazinga N, Delnoij D, Ten Asbroek A, Custers T: Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003, 15(5):377-398.
• [36]Ten Asbroek A, Arah O, Geelhoed J, Custers T, Delnoij D, Klazinga N: Developing a national performance indicator framework for the Dutch health system. Int J Qual Health Care 2004, 16(suppl 1):i65-i71.
• [37]Lauriks S, Buster MC, de Wit MA, Arah OA, Klazinga NS: Performance indicators for public mental healthcare: a systematic international inventory. BMC Public Health 2012, 12(1):214. BioMed Central Full Text
• [38]Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ, Groenewegen PP: The Dutch Consumer Quality Index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10(1):88. BioMed Central Full Text
• [39]Zuidgeest M, Delnoij DM, Luijkx KG, de Boer D, Westert GP: Patients' experiences of the quality of long-term care among the elderly: comparing scores over time. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12(1):26. BioMed Central Full Text
• [40]Zuidgeest M, Strating M, Luijkx K, Westert G, Delnoij ED: Using client experiences for quality improvement in long-term care organizations. Int J Qual Health Care 2012, 24(3):224-229.
• [41]Ancarani A, Di Mauro C, Giammanco MD: How are organisational climate models and patient satisfaction related? A competing value framework approach. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69(12):1813-1818.
• [42]Mensik JS, Martin DM, Scott KA, Horton K: Development of a Professional Nursing Framework: The Journey Toward Nursing Excellence. J Nurs Adm 2011, 41(6):259-264.
• [43]Donahue MO, Piazza IM, Griffin MQ, Dykes PC, Fitzpatrick JJ: The relationship between nurses' perceptions of empowerment and patient satisfaction. Appl Nurs Res 2008, 21(1):2-7.
• [44]de Brouwer B: Measuring the nursing work environment: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Essentials of Magnetism. Int Nurs Rev 2014. In Press