期刊论文详细信息
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives
Martin Underwood2  Christian Fossum6  Dévan Rajendran6  Tamar Pincus5  Clive Seale4  Sandra Eldridge1  Sue Patterson3  Robert Froud6 
[1]Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, Whitechapel, London E1 2AB, UK
[2]Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
[3]Metro North Mental Health, Royal Brisbane and Womens’ Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
[4]School of Social Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
[5]Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK
[6]University College of Health Sciences, Campus Kristiania, Prinsens gate 7-9, 0153 Oslo, Norway
关键词: Population-based interventions;    Social factors;    Qualitative synthesis;    Low back pain;    Outcome measure development;    Outcome measurement;   
Others  :  1128789
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-15-50
 received in 2013-07-19, accepted in 2014-01-22,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem that many interpret within a biopsychosocial model. There is renewed concern that core-sets of outcome measures do not capture what is important. To inform debate about the coverage of back pain outcome measure core-sets, and to suggest areas worthy of exploration within healthcare consultations, we have synthesised the qualitative literature on the impact of low back pain on people’s lives.

Methods

Two reviewers searched CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PEDro, and Medline, identifying qualitative studies of people’s experiences of non-specific LBP. Abstracted data were thematic coded and synthesised using a meta-ethnographic, and a meta-narrative approach.

Results

We included 49 papers describing 42 studies. Patients are concerned with engagement in meaningful activities; but they also want to be believed and have their experiences and identity, as someone ‘doing battle’ with pain, validated. Patients seek diagnosis, treatment, and cure, but also reassurance of the absence of pathology. Some struggle to meet social expectations and obligations. When these are achieved, the credibility of their pain/disability claims can be jeopardised. Others withdraw, fearful of disapproval, or unable or unwilling to accommodate social demands. Patients generally seek to regain their pre-pain levels of health, and physical and emotional stability. After time, this can be perceived to become unrealistic and some adjust their expectations accordingly.

Conclusions

The social component of the biopsychosocial model is important to patients but not well represented in current core-sets of outcome measures. Clinicians should appreciate that the broader impact of low back pain includes social factors; this may be crucial to improving patients’ experiences of health care. Researchers should consider social factors to help develop a portfolio of more relevant outcome measures.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Froud et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150225082836464.pdf 475KB PDF download
Figure 1. 96KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, et al.: Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013, 380(9859):2163-2196.
  • [2]Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, et al.: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013, 380(9859):2197-2223.
  • [3]Donaldson L: 150 years of the annual report of the Chief Medical Officer. London: Department of Health; 2009.
  • [4]Maniadakis N, Gray A: The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000, 84:95-103.
  • [5]Dunn KM, Croft PR: Epidemiology and natural history of low back pain. Eura Medicophys 2004, 40(1):9-13.
  • [6]Croft PR, Macfarlane GJ, Papageorgiou AC, Thomas E, Silman AJ: Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study. BMJ 1998, 316(7141):1356-1359.
  • [7]Waddell G: Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 1987, 12(7):632-644.
  • [8]Bombardier C: Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 2000, 25(24):3100-3103.
  • [9]Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G: Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998, 23(18):2003-2013.
  • [10]Muller U, Duetz MS, Roeder C, Greenough CG: Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation. Eur Spine J 2004, 13(4):301-313.
  • [11]Froud R: Improving interpretation of patient-reported outcomes in low back pain trials. In Queen Mary University of London. London: PhD Thesis; 2010.
  • [12]Hush J, Refshauge K, Sullivan G, Souza L, Maher C, McAuley J: Recovery: what does this mean to patients with low back pain? Arthritis Rheum 2009, 61(1):124-131.
  • [13]Hush JM, Refshauge KM, Sullivan G, De Souza L, McAuley JH: Do numerical rating scales and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire capture changes that are meaningful to patients with persistent back pain? Clin Rehabil 2010, 24(7):648-657.
  • [14]Mullis R, Barber J, Lewis M, Hay E: ICF core sets for low back pain: do they include what matters to patients? J Rehabil Med 2007, 39(5):353-357.
  • [15]Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, et al.: Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005, 113(1–2):9-19.
  • [16]Bombardier CMDF: Spine focus issue introduction: outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. Spine 2000, 25(24):3097-3099. 3092
  • [17]Foster NE, Dziedzic KS, van der Windt DAWM, Fritz JM, Hay EM: Research priorities for non-pharmacological therapies for common musculoskeletal problems: nationally and internationally agreed recommendations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:3. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [18]Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R: Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002, 7(4):209-215.
  • [19]Marston C, King E: Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review. Lancet 2006, 368(9547):1581-1586.
  • [20]Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R: Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2005, 61(2):417-430.
  • [21]Airaksinen O, Brox J, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs FM, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, et al.: European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2006, 15(Suppl, 2):S192-S300.
  • [22]Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW: Back schools for non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, 4:CD000261.
  • [23]Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007, 19(6):349-357.
  • [24]Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC: The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ 2010, 340:c112.
  • [25]Noblit G, Hare R: MetaEthnography: synthesising qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.
  • [26]Schutz A: Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. J Philos 1954, 51:270-273.
  • [27]Keen S, Dowell A, Hurst K, Klaber Moffett J, Tovey P, Williams R: Individuals with low back pain: how do they view physical activity? Fam Pract 1999, 16(1):39-45.
  • [28]Ong BN, Hooper H: Involving users in low back pain research. Health Expect 2003, 6:332-341.
  • [29]Ong BN, Hooper H: Comparing clinical and lay accounts of the diagnosis and treatment of back pain. Sociol Health Illn 2006, 28(2):203-222.
  • [30]Tarasuk T, Eakin J: The problem of legitimacy in the experience of work-related back injury. Qual Health Res 1995, 5(2):204-221.
  • [31]Coole C, Watson PJ, Drummond A: Staying at work with back pain: patients’ experiences of work-related help received from GPs and other clinicians. A qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 11:190. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-190 BioMed Central Full Text
  • [32]Allegretti A, Borkan J, Reis S, Griffiths F: Paired interviews of shared experiences around chronic low back pain: classic mismatch between patients and their doctors. Fam Pract 2010, 27(6):676-683.
  • [33]Benjaminsson O, Biguet G, Arvidsson I, Nilsson-Wikmar L: Recurrent low back pain: relapse from a patient perspective. J Rehabil Med 2007, 39(8):640-645.
  • [34]Borkan J, Reis S, Hermoni D, Biderman A: Talking about the pain: a patient-centered study of low back pain in primary care. Soc Sci Med 1995, 40(7):977-989.
  • [35]Bowman JM: The meaning of chronic low back pain. AAOHN J 1991, 39(8):381-384.
  • [36]Bowman JM: Experiencing the chronic pain phenomenon: a study. Rehabil Nurs 1994, 19(2):91-96.
  • [37]Bowman JM: Reactions to chronic low back pain. Issues Ment Health Nurs 1994, 15(4):445-454.
  • [38]Busch H: Appraisal and coping processes among chronic low back pain patients. Scand J Caring Sci 2005, 19(4):396-403.
  • [39]Campbell C, Guy A: ‘Why can’t they do anything for a simple back problem?’ A qualitative examination of expectations for low back pain treatment and outcome. J Health Psychol 2007, 12(4):641-653.
  • [40]Chew CA, May CR: The benefits of back pain. Fam Pract 1997, 14(6):461-465.
  • [41]Cook FM, Hassenkamp A: Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: the patient’s perspective. Physiotherapy 2000, 86(2):61-69.
  • [42]Coole C, Drummond A, Watson PJ, Radford K: What concerns workers with low back pain? Findings of a qualitative study of patients referred for rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 2010, 20(4):472-481.
  • [43]Corbett M, Foster NE, Ong BN: Living with low back pain-- stories of hope and despair. Soc Sci Med 2007, 65(8):1584-1595.
  • [44]Crowe M, Whitehead L, Gagan MJ, Baxter GD, Pankhurst A, Valledor V: Listening to the body and talking to myself - the impact of chronic lower back pain: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2010, 47(5):586-593.
  • [45]De Souza LH, Frank AO: Experiences of living with chronic back pain: the physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29(7):587-596.
  • [46]De Souza L, Frank AO: Patients’ experiences of the impact of chronic back pain on family life and work. Disabil Rehabil 2011, 33(4):310-318.
  • [47]Dean SG, Hudson S, Hay-Smith EJ, Milosavljevic S: Rural workers’ experience of low back pain: exploring why they continue to work. J Occup Rehabil 2011, 21(3):395.
  • [48]Holloway I, Sofaer-Bennett B, Walker J: The stigmatisation of people with chronic back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29(18):1456-1464.
  • [49]Hooper H, Ong BN: When Harry met Barry, and other stories: a partner’s influence on relationships in back pain care. Anthropol Med 2005, 12(1):47-60.
  • [50]Layzell M: Back pain management: a patient satisfaction study of services. Br J Nurs 2001, 10(12):800-807.
  • [51]Liddle SD, Baxter GD, Gracey JH: Chronic low back pain: patients’ experiences, opinions and expectations for clinical management. Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29(24):1899-1910.
  • [52]May CR, Rose MJ, Johnstone FC: Dealing with doubt. How patients account for non-specific chronic low back pain. J Psychosom Res 2000, 49(4):223-225.
  • [53]Morris AL: Patients’ perspectives on self-management following a back rehabilitation programme. Musculoskeletal Care 2004, 2(3):165-179.
  • [54]Ong BN, Hooper H, Dunn K, Croft P: Establishing self and meaning in low back pain narratives. 2004, 532-549.
  • [55]Osborn M, Smith JA: The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Br J Health Psychol 1998, 3(1):65-83.
  • [56]Osborn M, Smith JA: Living with a body separate from the self. The experience of the body in chronic benign low back pain: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Scand J Caring Sci 2006, 20(2):216-223.
  • [57]Reid M: An assessment of health needs of chronic low back pain patients from general practice. J Health Psychol 2004, 9(3):451-463.
  • [58]Skelton AM, Murphy EA, Murphy RJL, O’Dowd TC: Patients’ views of low back pain and its management in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1996, 46(404):153-156.
  • [59]Slade SC, Molloy E, Keating JL: People with non-specific chronic low back pain who have participated in exercise programs have preferences about exercise: a qualitative study. Aust J Physiother 2009, 55(2):115-122.
  • [60]Slade SC, Molloy E, Keating JL: ‘Listen to me, tell me’: a qualitative study of partnership in care for people with non-specific chronic low back pain. Clin Rehabil 2009, 23(3):270-281.
  • [61]Slade SC, Molloy E, Keating JL: Stigma experienced by people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a qualitative study. Pain Med 2009, 10(1):143-155.
  • [62]Sloots M, Dekker JHM, Pont M, Bartels EA, Geertzen JHB, Dekker J: Reasons for drop-out from rehabilitation in patients of Turkish and Moroccan origin with chronic low back pain in The Netherlands: a qualitative study. J Rehabil Med 2010, 42(6):566-574.
  • [63]Smith JA, Osborn M: Pain as an assault on the self: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the psychological impact of chronic benign low back pain. Psychol Health 2007, 22(5):517-535.
  • [64]Snelgrove S, Liossi C: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of living with chronic low back pain. Br J Health Psychol 2009, 14(4):735-749.
  • [65]Sokunbi O, Cross V, Watt P, Moore A: Experiences of individuals with chronic low back pain during and after their participation in a spinal stabilisation exercise programme - a pilot qualitative study. Manual Therapy 2010, 15(2):179-184.
  • [66]Strong J, Ashton R, Chant D, Cramond T: An investigation of the dimensions of chronic low back pain: the patients’ perspectives. Br J Occup Ther 1994, 57(6):204-208.
  • [67]Strong J, Large RG: Coping with chronic low back pain: an idiographic exploration through focus groups. Int J Psychiatry Med 1995, 25(4):371-387.
  • [68]Tavafian SS, Gregory D, Montazeri A: The experience of low back pain in Iranian women: a focus group study. Health Care Women Int 2008, 29(4):339-349.
  • [69]Tveito TH, Shaw WS, Huang Y, Nicholas M, Wagner G: Managing pain in the workplace: a focus group study of challenges, strategies and what matters most to workers with low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2010, 32(24):2035-2046.
  • [70]Wade BL, Shantall HM: The meaning of chronic pain: a phenomenological analysis. S Afr J Physiother 2003, 59(1):10-20.
  • [71]Walker J, Holloway I, Sofaer B: In the system: the lived experience of chronic back pain from the perspectives of those seeking help from pain clinics. Pain 1999, 80(3):621-628.
  • [72]Walker J, Sofaer B, Holloway I: The experience of chronic back pain: accounts of loss in those seeking help from pain clinics. Eur J Pain 2006, 10(3):199-207.
  • [73]Young AE, Wasiak R, Phillips L, Gross DP: Workers’ perspectives on low back pain recurrence: “it comes and goes and comes and goes, but it’s always there”. Pain 2011, 152(1):204-211.
  • [74]Croft P, Froud R, Lewis AM: Dropouts and sub-groups–statistics can help but not cure. Pain 2010, 151(3):563-564.
  • [75]Jayson M (Ed): Outcome measures for back pain: introduction, justification, and epidemiology. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1999.
  • [76]Cieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M, Disler P, Jackel W, van der Linden S, Kostanjsek N, de Bie R: ICF core sets for low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2004, (44 Suppl):69-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15370751 webcite
  • [77]Rose G: Sick individuals and populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985, 14:32-38.
  • [78]Martin PJ, Harvey JT, Culvenor JF, Payne WR: Effect of a nurse back injury prevention intervention on the rate of injury compensation claims. J Safety Res 2009, 40(1):13-19.
  • [79]Georgy EE, Carr EC, Breen AC: Back pain management in primary care: patients’ and doctors’ expectations. Qual Prim Care 2009, 17(6):405-413.
  • [80]Parsons S, Harding G, Breen A, Foster N, Pincus T, Vogel S, Underwood M: The influence of patients’ and primary care practitioners’ beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Clin J Pain 2007, 23(1):91-98.
  • [81]Buchbinder R, Batterham R, Elsworth G, Dionne C, Irvin E, Osborne R: A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model. Arthritis Res Ther 2011, 13(5):R152. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [82]Sanders T, Foster NE, Bishop A, Ong BN: Biopsychosocial care and the physiotherapy encounter: physiotherapists’ accounts of back pain consultations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013, 14:65. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [83]Jeffrey JE, Foster NE: A qualitative investigation of physical therapists’ experiences and feelings of managing patients with nonspecific low back pain. Phys Ther 2012, 92(2):266-278.
  • [84]Foster NE, Delitto A: Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: integration of psychosocially informed management principles into physical therapist practice–challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther 2011, 91(5):790-803.
  • [85]Carnes D, Parsons S, Ashby D, Breen A, Foster NE, Pincus T, Vogel S, Underwood M: Chronic musculoskeletal pain rarely presents in a single body site: results from a UK population study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007, 46(7):1168-1170.
  • [86]Scarry E: The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:3次