Language, culture and international exchange of virtual patients

BMC Medical Education

Uno GH Fors²  Stefan Tigan¹  Tudor Calinici¹  Valentin Muntean¹ 

[1]University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

[2]Department of Computer and Systems Science, Sweden, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

关键词: Medical education;    International educational exchange;    Cultural competency;    Language;    Computer simulation;    Virtual patients;   

Others  :  1139013
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-13-21

 received in 2012-09-25, accepted in 2013-02-06,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Language and cultural differences could be a limiting factor for the international exchange of Virtual Patients (VPs), especially for small countries and languages of limited circulation. Our research evaluated whether it would be feasible to develop a VP based educational program in our Romanian institution, with cases in English and developed in a non-Romanian setting.

Method

The participants in the research comprised 4^th year Romanian medical students from the Faculty of Medicine in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, with previous training exclusively in Romanian, good English proficiency and no experience with VPs. The students worked on eight VPs in two identical versions, Romanian and English. The first group (2010) of 136 students worked with four VPs developed in Cluj and the second group (2011) of 144 students with four VPs originally developed at an US University. Every student was randomly assigned two different VPs, one in Romanian and another in English. Student activity throughout the case, the diagnosis, therapeutic plan and diagnosis justification were recorded. We also compared student performance on the two VPs versions, Romanian and English and the student performance on the two sets of cases, originally developed in Romania, respectively USA.

Results

We found no significant differences between the students’ performance on the Romanian vs. English version of VPs. Regarding the students’ performance on the two sets of cases, in those originally developed in Romania, respectively in the USA, we found a number of statistically significant differences in the students’ activity through the cases. There were no statistically significant differences in the students’ ability to reach the correct diagnosis and therapeutic plan.

Conclusion

The development of our program with VPs in English would be feasible, cost-effective and in accordance with the globalization of medical education.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Muntean et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ellaway R, Poulton T, Fors U, McGee JB, Albright S: Building a virtual patient commons. Med Teach 2008, 3(2):170-174.
• [2]Bergin R, Fors U: Interactive Simulation of Patients – an advanced tool for student-activated learning in medicine & healthcare. Computers and Education 2003, 40(4):361-376.
• [3]Stevens A, Hernandez J, Johnsen K, Dickerson R, Raij A, Harrison C, DiPietro M, Allen B, Ferdig R, Foti S, Jackson J, Shin M, Cendan J, Watson R, Duerson M, Lok B, Cohen M, Wagner P, Lind DS: The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills. Am J Surg 2006, 19(6):806-811. 1
• [4]Triola M, Feldman H, Kalet AL, Zabar S, Kachur EK, Gillespie C, Anderson M, Griesser C, Lipkin M: A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patients. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21(5):424-429.
• [5]Cook DA, Triola MM: Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ 2009, 43(4):303-311.
• [6]Fors UG, Muntean V, Botezatu M, Zary N: Cross-cultural use and development of virtual patients. Med Teach 2009, 31(8):732-738.
• [7]Perron NJ, Perneger T, Kolly V, Dao MD, Somer J, Hudelson P: Use of a computer-based simulated consultation tool to assess whether doctors explore sociocultural factors during patient evaluation. J Eval Clin Pract 2009, 15(6):1190-1195.
• [8]Berman NB, Fall LH, Chessman AW, Dell MR, Lang VJ, Leong SL, Nixon LJ, Smith S: A collaborative model for developing and maintaining virtual patients for medical education. Med Teach 2011, 33(4):319-324.
• [9]Balasubramaniam C, Poulton T: Repurposing Existing Virtual Patients. http://www.elu.sgul.ac.uk/revip/deliverables/final-report/ webcite
• [10]Kempkens D, Hege I, de Leng B, Fors UGH, Huwendiek S, Kononowicz AA, Poulton T, Fischer MR: Estimation Of Time And Efforts For Repurposing Virtual Patients - Experiences From The Electronic Virtual Patient Project (eViP). http://www.medbiq.org/events/conferences/2010/agenda.html webcite
• [11]Zary N, Johnson G, Boberg J, Fors UG: Development, implementation and pilot evaluation of a Web-based Virtual Patient Case Simulation environment–Web-SP. BMC Med Educ 2006, Feb 21, 6:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Web-SP web site. http://dsv.su.se/en/new-research/learning/projects/vc_web-sp webcite
• [13]Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C: Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med 2007, 82(5):446-451.
• [14]Botezatu M, Hult H, Tessma MK, Fors U: Virtual patient simulation: knowledge gain or knowledge loss? Med Teach 2010, 32(7):562-568.
• [15]Botezatu M, Hult H, Tessma MK, Fors UG: Virtual patient simulation for learning and assessment: Superior results in comparison with regular course exams. Med Teach 2010, 32(10):845-850.
• [16]Deladisma AM, Johnsen K, Raij A, Rossen B, Kotranza A, Kalapurakal M, Szlam S, Bittner JG, Swinson D, Lok B, Lind DS: Medical student satisfaction using a virtual patient system to learn history-taking communication skills. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008, 132:101-105.
• [17]Round J, Conradi E, Poulton T: Improving assessment with virtual patients. Med Teach 2009, 31(8):759-763.
• [18]Gesundheit N, Brutlag P, Youngblood P, Gunning WT, Zary N, Fors U: The use of virtual patients to assess the clinical skills and reasoning of medical students: initial insights on student acceptance. Med Teach 2009, 31(8):739-742.
• [19]Bergeron BP: Virtual reality applications in clinical medicine. J Med Pract Manage 2003, 18(4):211-215.
• [20]Triola MM, Campion N, McGee JB, Albright S, Greene P, Smothers V, Ellaway R: An XML standard for virtual patients: exchanging case-based simulations in medical education. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007, 11:741-745.
• [21]Poulton T, Balasubramaniam C: Virtual patients: A year of change. Med Teach 2011, 33(11):933-937.
• [22]Kononowicz AA, Zary N, Davies D, Heid J, Woodham L, Hege I: Push and pull models to manage patient consent and licensing of multimedia resources in digital repositories for case-based reasoning. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011, 169:203-207.
• [23]Campbell G, Miller A, Balasubramaniam C: The role of intellectual property in creating, sharing and repurposing virtual patients. Med Teach 2009, 31(8):709-712.
• [24]Huwendiek S, BA Dl, Zary N, Fischer MR, Ruiz JG, Ellaway R: Towards a typology of virtual patients. Med Teach 2009, 31(8):743-748.
• [25]Posel N, Fleiszer D, Shore BM: 12 Tips: Guidelines for authoring virtual patient cases. Med Teach 2009, 31(8):701-708.
• [26]Morin A, Benhamou AC, Spector M, Bonnin A, Debry C: The French language virtual medical university. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004, 104:213-219.
• [27]Fischer MR, Hege I, Hornlein A, Puppe F, Tonshoff B, Huwendiek S: Virtual patients in medical education: a comparison of various strategies for curricular integration. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2008, 102(10):648-653.
• [28]Hornlein A, Mandel A, Ifland M, Luneberg E, Deckert J, Puppe F: Acceptance of medical training cases as supplement to lectures. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2011, 28(3):Doc42.
• [29]Norcini JJ, Mazmanian PE: Physician migration, education, and health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2005, 25(1):4-7.
• [30]Harden RM: A new vision for distance learning and continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2005, 25(1):43-51.