Varicella seroprevalence in healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital: an audit of cross-sectional data

BMC Research Notes

Paul Anantharajah Tambyah¹  Dale Andrew Fisher¹  Indumathi Venkatachalam¹  Sharon Saw¹  Chikul Mittal¹  Alexander Wilhelm Gorny¹ 

[1] National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore

关键词: Immunisation;    Varicella;    Seroprevalence;    Healthcare worker;   

Others  :  1232730
DOI  :  10.1186/s13104-015-1656-0

 received in 2015-04-14, accepted in 2015-11-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The seroprevalence of varicella in Southeast Asia is not well described especially in healthcare workers (HCW) in the region. We report the varicella seroprevalence among healthcare workers from a diverse range of countries working in a tertiary care hospital in Singapore.

Methods

We audited the results of annual HCW health screening, which included a varicella assay, from the years 2009 to 2014. During this period, there was a change in hospital policy mandating varicella immunity for all newly employed healthcare workers. The serological data were reviewed with employment records on occupation and nationality. Seroprevalence rates were determined by standard commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assays for each year of testing. Odds of being immune in 2014 were compared by means of multiple logistic regression.

Results

A total of 10,585 samples were obtained from 6668 unique individuals over four separate cross-sections of the hospital workforce. A peak seroprevalence of 92.8 % (95 % CI 92.0–93.5) was recorded in 2014. Younger employees had a lower seroprevalence than their older colleagues. In a consolidated sample of 4875 members of the active workforce in October 2014, we identified that Indian nationals were less likely to be immune than their Singaporean national colleagues, odds ratio (OR) 0.26 (95 % CI 0.17–0.43, p < 0.001), while Chinese nationals were more likely to be immune, OR 4.34 (95 % CI 1.61–12.2, p = 0.004), after controlling for year of screening, gender, age-group and vocation. In 2014, being employed as administrative staff, OR 0.43 (95 % CI 0.29–0.64, p < 0.001) or contract service provider, OR 0.30 (95 % CI 0.19–0.47, p < 0.001), was also associated with a lower odds of being immune than being employed as a nurse.

Conclusions

There remain a small number of healthcare workers who are non-immune to varicella in our tertiary hospital. A new pre-employment policy of mandatory screening and vaccination may have increased rates of immunity but more needs to be done to ensure that all of our employees are immune to varicella to protect our vulnerable patients.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Gorny et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig.1.

Fig.2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Immunization of health-care personnel: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR. Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Week Rep. Recommendations and Reports/Centers for Disease Control. 2011;60(RR-7):1.
• [2]Sydnor E, Perl TM: Healthcare providers as sources of vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccine. 2014, 32(38):4814-4822.
• [3]Fatha N, Ang LW, Goh KT: Changing seroprevalence of varicella zoster virus infection in a tropical city state, Singapore. Int J Inf Dis. 2014, 22:73-77.
• [4]Ang LW, Kita Y, James L, Cutter JL: A 20-year epidemiological review of the seroprevalence of varicella zoster virus infection among children and adolescents in Singapore. Epidemiol News Bulletin Q 2013, 39(1):1-8.
• [5]Director of Medical Services, Ministry of Health, Singapore. Guidelines for private hospital, medical clinics and laboratories under the private hospitals and medical clinics act (1980) and regulations (1991), last updated 2007. https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/Publications/guidelines/private_healthcare_institutions/2007/guidelines_under_the_private_hospitals_and_medical_clinics_act_2007_(146%20KB).html. Accessed 04 Oct 2015.
• [6]Thiede R, Sutton T, Duester H, Sutton M. Quantum GIS training manual release 1.0. 2014. http://manual.linfiniti.com/LinfinitiQGISTrainingManual-en.pdf. Accessed 08 Mar 2015.
• [7]von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP: Strobe initiative. the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prev Med 2007, 45(4):247-251.
• [8]Chong CY, Lim SH, Ng WYM, Tee N, Lin RVTP: Varicella screening and vaccination for healthcare workers at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital. Ann Acad Med Singap 2004, 33(2):243-247.
• [9]Wu MF, Yang YW, Lin WY, Chang CY, Soon MS, Liu CE: Varicella zoster virus infection among healthcare workers in Taiwan: seroprevalence and predictive value of history of varicella infection. J Hosp Infect 2012, 80(2):162-167.
• [10]Kumakura S, Shibata H, Onoda K, Nishimura N, Matsuda C, Hirose M: Seroprevalence survey on measles, mumps, rubella and varicella antibodies in healthcare workers in Japan: sex, age, occupational-related differences and vaccine efficacy. Epidemiol Infect 2014, 142(01):12-19.
• [11]Hatakeyama S, Moriya K, Itoyama S, Nukui Y, Uchida M, Shintani Y, et al.: Prevalence of measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella antibodies among healthcare workers in Japan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004, 25(7):591-594.
• [12]Kanamori H, Tokuda K, Ikeda S, Endo S, Ishizawa C, Hirai Y, et al.: Prevaccination antibody screening and immunization program for healthcare personnel against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in a Japanese Tertiary Care Hospital. Tohoku J Exp Med 2014, 234(2):111-116.
• [13]Sam IC, Tariman H, Chan YF, Bador MK, Yusof MM, Hassan H: Varicella-zoster virus seroprevalence in healthcare workers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Med J Malays. 2008, 63(5):429-430.
• [14]Almuneef M, Dillon J, Abbas MF, Memish Z: Varicella zoster virus immunity in multinational health care workers of a Saudi Arabian hospital. Am J Inf Control. 2006, 31(6):375-381.
• [15]Fung LWY, Lao TT, Suen SSH, Chan OK, Lau TK, Ngai KL, et al.: Seroprevalence of varicella zoster virus among pregnant women in Hong Kong: comparison with self-reported history. Vaccine. 2011, 29(46):8186-8188.
• [16]Lee BW: Review of varicella zoster seroepidemiology in India and South-east Asia. Trop Med Int Health 1998, 3(11):886-890.
• [17]Lolekha S, Tanthiphabha W, Sornchai P, Kosuwan P, Sutra S, Warachit B, et al.: Effect of climatic factors and population density on varicella zoster virus epidemiology within a tropical country. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001, 64(3):131-136.
• [18]Lokeshwar MR, Agrawal A, Subbarao SD, Chakraborty MS, Prasad AR, Weil J, et al.: Age related seroprevalence of antibodies to varicella in India. Indian Pediatr 2000, 37(7):714-719.
• [19]Dashraath P, Ong E, Lee VJ: Seroepidemiology of varicella and the reliability of a self-reported history of varicella infection in Singapore military recruits. Ann Acad Med Singap 2007, 36(8):636-641.
• [20]Menkhaus N, Lanphear B, Linnemann C: Airborne transmission of varicella-zoster virus in hospitals. Lancet. 1990, 336(8726):1315.