Assessing changes in quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) in patients with different classifications of malocclusion during comprehensive orthodontic treatment

BMC Oral Health

Jun Zhang²  Chao Kong²  Chao Xu²  Shu-Ya Zhao²  Yu-Ran Su²  Xu-Xia Wang¹  De-Hua Zheng² 

[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China;Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China

关键词: Patient assessment;    Orthodontic treatment;    Oral health-related quality of life;   

Others  :  1233827
DOI  :  10.1186/s12903-015-0130-7

 received in 2015-03-30, accepted in 2015-11-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The objectives of this study were to investigated changes in OHRQoL among patients with different classifications of malocclusion during comprehensive orthodontic treatment.

Methods

Clinical data were collected from 81 patients (aged 15 to 24) who had undergone comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Participants were classified 3 groups: Class I (n = 35), II (n = 32) and III (n = 14) by Angle classification. OHRQoL was assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). All subjects were examined and interviewed at baseline (T0), after alignment and leveling (T1), after correction of molar relationship and space closure (T2), after finishing (T3). Friedman 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the relative changes of OHRQoL among the different time points. A Bonferroni correction with P < 0.005 was used to declare significance.

Results

Significant reductions were observed in all seven OHIP-14 domains of three groups except for social disability (P > 0.005) in class I and class II, Handicap in class II and class III (P > 0.005). Class I patients showed significant changes for psychological disability and psychological discomfort domain at T1, functional limitation, physical pain at T2. Class III patients showed a significant benefit in all domains except physical pain and functional limitation. Class II patients showed significant changes in the physical pain, functional disability, and physical disability domains at T1.

Conclusions

The impact of comprehensive orthodontic treatment on patients’ OHRQoL do not follow the same pattern among patients with different malocclusion. Class II patients benefits the most from the stage of space closure, while class I patients benefits the first stage (alignment and leveling) of treatment in psychological disability and psychological discomfort domains.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Zheng et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25:284-90.
• [2]Liu P, McGrath C, Cheung GSP. Improvement in oral health–related quality of life after endodontic treatment: a prospective longitudinal study. J Endod. 2014; 40:805-10.
• [3]Viola AP, Takamiya AS, Monteiro DR, Barbosa DB. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction before and after treatment with complete dentures in a Dental School in Brazil. J Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57:36-41.
• [4]Zhang M, Mc Grath C, Hagg U. Changes in oral health-related quality of life during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:25-9.
• [5]O’Brien K, Kay L, Fox D, Mandall N. Assessing oral health outcomes for orthodontics—measuring health status and quality of life. Community Dent Health. 1998; 15:22-6.
• [6]Wong MC, Lo EC, McMillan AS. Validation of a Chinese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002; 30:423-30.
• [7]Astrom AN, Okullo l. Validity and reliability of the Oral impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) frequency scale: a cross sectional study of adolescents in Uganda. BMC Oral Health. 2003; 3:5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Nagarajappa R, Batra M, Sanadhya S, Daryani H, Ramesh G. Relationship between oral clinical conditions and daily performances among young adults in India – a cross sectional study. J Epidemiol Global Health. 2015; Article in press.
• [9]Feu D, Minguel JAM, Celeste RK, Oliveira BH. Effect of orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83:892-8.
• [10]Bernabé E, Sheiham A, Tsakos G, Messias de Oliveria C. The impact of orthodontic treatment on the quality of life in adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30:515-20.
• [11]Arrow P, Brennan D, Spencer AJ. Quality of life and psychological outcomes after fixed orthodontic treatment: a 17-year observational cohort study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011; 39:505-14.
• [12]Soe KK, Gelbier S, Robinson PG. Reliability and validity of two oral health related quality of life measures in Myanmar adolescents. Community Dent Health. 2004; 21:306-11.
• [13]Robinson PG, Gibson B, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. Validity of two oral health related quality of life measures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003; 31:90-9.
• [14]Baker SR, Pankhurst CL, Robinson PG. Utility of two oral health related quality of life measures in patients with xerostomia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006; 34:351-62.
• [15]Hongxing L, Tc l, Nilsson L-M, Johansson A. Validity and reliability of OIDP and OHIP-14: a survey of Chinese high school students. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14:158-68. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Chen M, Wang DW, Wu LP. Fixed orthodontic appliance therapy and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in chinese patients. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:49-53.
• [17]Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment—effects on compliance and prediction of patients’ adaptation by personality variables. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22:307-15.
• [18]Branda˜o Magalha˜es I. The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:981-7.
• [19]Fontijn-Tekamp FA, van der Bilt A, Abbink JH, Bosman F. Swallowing threshold and masticatory performance in dentate adults. Physiol Behav. 2004; 432:431-6.
• [20]Shaw WC, Richmond S, Pamela M. A 20-year cohort study of health gain from orthodontic treatment: psychological outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132:146-57.
• [21]Lovius BBJ, Jones RB, Pospisil OA, Reid D, Slade PD, Wynne THM. The specific psychosocial effects of orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1990; 18:339-42.
• [22]Lazaridou-Terzoudi T, Kiyak HA’, Moore R, Athanasiou AE, Melsen B. Long-term assessment of psychological outcomes of orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:545-52.
• [23]Motegi E, Hatch JP, Rugh JD, Yamaguchi H. Health-related quality of life and psychosocial function 5 years after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:138-43.
• [24]Rustemeyer J, Martin A, Gregersen J. Changes in quality of life and their relation to cephalometric changes in orthognathicsurgery patients. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82:235-41.
• [25]Soh CL, Narayanan V. Quality of life assessment in patients with dentofacial deformity undergoing orthodontic surgery- a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 42:974-80.
• [26]Nicodemo D, Pereira MD, Ferreira LM. Effect of orthognathic surgery for class III correction on quality of life as measured by SF-36. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37:131-4.
• [27]Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48:1507-15.
• [28]Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an orthodontic treatment priority index. Eur J Orthod. 1989; 11:309-20.
• [29]Daniels CP, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod. 2000; 27:149-62.