What are the most important tasks of tutors during the tutorials in hybrid problem-based learning curricula?

BMC Medical Education

Anselme Derese³  Alain G Verstraete¹  Yves Rosseel⁴  Bram De Wever²  Ruth Boelens² 

[1] Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, 9000, Belgium;Department of Educational Studies, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent, 9000, Belgium;Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, 9000, Belgium;Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 1, Ghent, 9000, Belgium

关键词: Tutor roles;    Problem-based learning;   

Others  :  1206341
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-015-0368-4

 received in 2014-10-24, accepted in 2015-04-28,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

In problem-based learning, a tutor, the quality of the problems and group functioning play a central role in stimulating student learning. This study is conducted in a hybrid medical curriculum where problem-based learning is one of the pedagogical approaches. The aim of this study was to examine which tutor tasks are the most important during the tutorial sessions and thus should be promoted in hybrid (and in maybe all) problem-based learning curricula in higher education.

Methods

A student (N = 333) questionnaire was used to obtain data about the problem-based learning process, combined with the achievement score of the students on a multiple-choice exam. Structural equation modeling was used to test the fit of different models (two existing models and a new simplified model) representing the factors of interest and their relationships, in order to determine which tutor characteristics are the most important in the present study.

Results

A new simplified model is presented, which demonstrates that stimulation of active and self-directed learning by tutors enhances the perceived case quality and the perceived group functioning. There was no significant effect between the stimulation of collaborative learning and perceived group functioning. In addition, group functioning was not a significant predictor for achievement.

Conclusions

We found that stimulating active and self-directed learning are perceived as tutors’ most important tasks with regard to perceived case quality and group functioning. It is necessary to train and teach tutors how they can stimulate active and self-directed learning by students.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Boelens et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Dochy F, Segers M, Van den Bossche P, Gijbels D. Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instr. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7.
• [2]Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev. 2004. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
• [3]Neufeld VR, Barrows HS. The ‘McMaster Philosophy’: an approach to medical education. J Med Educ. 1974; 49:1040-50.
• [4]Savery JR. Overview of Problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplin J Problem based Learn. 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
• [5]Van Berkel HJM, Dolmans DHJM. The influence of tutoring competencies on problems, group functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning. Med Educ. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02530.x.
• [6]Savery JR, Duffy TM. Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. CRLT Technical Report 16-01, Center for Research on Teaching and Technology, Indiana University. http://wordpress.uark.edu/tfsc/files/2014/09/Problem-Based-Learning-.pdf
• [7]Strobel J, van Barneveld A. When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplin J Problem based Learn. 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046.
• [8]Mennin S, Gordan P, Majoor G, Osman HAS. News from the network: towards unity for health. Position paper on problem-based learning. Educ Health. 2003. doi:10.1080/1357628031000066633.
• [9]Chng E, Yew EHJ, Schmidt HG. To what extent do tutor-related behaviours influence student learning in PBL? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9503-y.
• [10]Azer SA, Azer D. Group interaction in problem-based learning tutorials: a systematic review. Eur J Dent Educ. 2014. doi:10.1111/eje.12121.
• [11]Dolmans DHJM, Ginns P. A short questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of tutors in PBL. Validity and reliability. Med Teacher. 2005. doi:10.1080/01421590500136477.
• [12]Ertmer P, Newby T. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform Improv Q. 1993; 6(4):50-72.
• [13]Gijselaers WH, Schmidt HG. Development and evaluation of a causal model of problem-based learning. In: Innovation in medical education. An evaluation of its present status. Nooman ZM, Schmidt HG, Ezzat ES, editors. Springer, New York; 1990: p.95-113.
• [14]Van den Hurk MM, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, van der Vleuten CPM. Testing a causal model for learning in a problem-based curriculum. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2001; 6:141-9.
• [15]Walker A, Leary H. A problem based learning meta analysis: differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary J Problem based Learn. 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061.
• [16]Van der Veken J. In Depth Analysis of the Impact on Learning Patterns and Knowledge Acquisition of a Curriculum Innovation in Medical Education. Dissertation. Ghent University; 2008.
• [17]Van der Veken J, Valcke M, De Maeseneer J, Schuwirth L, Derese A. Impact on knowledge acquisition of the transition from a conventional to an integrated contextual medical curriculum. Med Educ. 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03397.x.
• [18]Schmidt HG. Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Med Educ. 1983. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb01086.x.
• [19]Dolmans DHJM, Janssen-Noordman A, Wolfhagen, IHAP. Can students differentiate between pbl tutors with different tutoring deficiencies? Med Teacher. 2006. doi:10.1080/01421590600776545.
• [20]Nieminen J, Sauri P, Lonka K. On the relationship between group functioning and study success in problem-based learning. Med Educ. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02344.x
• [21]Tipping J, Freeman RF, Rachlis AR. Using faculty and student perceptions of group dynamics to develop recommendations for PBL training. Acad Med. 1995; 70:1050-2.
• [22]Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012; 48(2):1-36.
• [23]Oberski D. Lavaan.survey: an R package for complex survey analysis of structural equation models. J Stat Softw. 2014; 57(1):1-27.
• [24]Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press, New York; 2006.
• [25]Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EHJ. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Med Educ. 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01941.x.
• [26]Yew EHJ, Yong JJY. Student perceptions of facilitators’ social congruence, use of expertise and cognitive congruence in problem-based learning. Instr Sci. 2014. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9306-1.
• [27]Miflin BM, Campbell CB, Price DA. A conceptual framework to guide the development of self-directed, lifelong learning in problem-based medical curricula. Med Educ. 2000; 34:299-306.
• [28]Kistner S, Rakoczy K, Otto B, Dignath-van Ewijk C, Büttner G, Klieme E. Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition Learn. 2010. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3.
• [29]Miflin BM, Campbell CB, Price DA. A lesson from the introduction of a problem-based, graduate entry course: the effects of different views of self-direction. Med Educ. 1999; 33:801-7.
• [30]Evans AW, Leeson RMA, Petrie A. Reliability of peer and self-assessment scores compared with trainers’ scores following third molar surgery. Med Educ. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02819.x.
• [31]Langendyk V. Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Med Educ. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02372.x.
• [32]Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP. The relationship between learning style and learning environment. Med Educ. 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01941.x.
• [33]Loyens SMM, Gijbels D, Coertjens L, Côté DJ. Students’ approaches to learning in problem-based learning: Taking into account professional behavior in the tutorial groups, self-study time, and different assessment aspects. Stud Educ Eval. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.10.004.
• [34]Vermetten YJ, Vermunt JD, Lodewijks HG. Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learn Instr. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00013-5.
• [35]Aarnio M, Lindblom-Ylänne S, Nieminen J, Pyörälä E. Dealing with conflicts on knowledge in tutorial groups. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9366-z.
• [36]Machado JLM, Machado VMP, Grec W, Bollela VR, Vieira JE. Self- and peer assessment may not be an accurate measure of pbl tutorial process. BMC Med Educ. 2008. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-55.
• [37]Darby JA. Are course evaluations subject to a halo effect? Res Educ. 2007; 77:46-55.