A qualitative study of health system barriers to accessibility and utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services in Ghana after user-fee abolition

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Easmon Otupiri³  Raymond Fitzpatrick¹  Michael Parker²  John Kuumuori Ganle⁴ 

[1] Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, Headington, United Kingdom;Nuffield Department of Population Health, The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, Headington, United Kingdom;Department of Community Health, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana;Department of Geography and Rural Development, Population, Health and Gender Studies Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

关键词: Ghana;    User-fee abolition;    Maternal healthcare;    Access;    Health system barriers;    Maternal and newborn health;   

Others  :  1090549
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-014-0425-8

 received in 2014-07-31, accepted in 2014-12-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

To reduce financial barriers to access, and improve access to and use of skilled maternal and newborn healthcare services, the government of Ghana, in 2003, implemented a new maternal healthcare policy that provided free maternity care services in all public and mission healthcare facilities. Although supervised delivery in Ghana has increased from 47% in 2003 to 55% in 2010, strikingly high maternal mortality ratio and low percentage of skilled attendance are still recorded in many parts of the country.

To explore health system factors that inhibit women’s access to and use of skilled maternal and newborn healthcare services in Ghana despite these services being provided free.

Methods

We conducted qualitative research with 185 expectant and lactating mothers and 20 healthcare providers in six communities in Ghana between November 2011 and May 2012. We used Attride-Stirling’s thematic network analysis framework to analyze and present our data.

Results

We found that in addition to limited and unequal distribution of skilled maternity care services, women’s experiences of intimidation in healthcare facilities, unfriendly healthcare providers, cultural insensitivity, long waiting time before care is received, limited birthing choices, poor care quality, lack of privacy at healthcare facilities, and difficulties relating to arranging suitable transportation were important health system barriers to increased and equitable access and use of services in Ghana.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight how a focus on patient-side factors can conceal the fact that many health systems and maternity healthcare facilities in low-income settings such as Ghana are still chronically under-resourced and incapable of effectively providing an acceptable minimum quality of care in the event of serious obstetric complications. Efforts to encourage continued use of maternity care services, especially skilled assistance at delivery, should focus on addressing those negative attributes of the healthcare system that discourage access and use.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Ganle et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Witter S, Arhinful KD, Kusi A, Zakariah-Akoto S: The experiences of Ghana in implementing a user fee exemption policy to provide free delivery care. Reprod Health Matters 2007, 15(30):61-71.
• [2]World Health Organization: Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2010: Estimates Developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and the World Bank. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2012.
• [3]Abor PA, Abekah-Nkrumah G, Sakyi K: The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Ghana. Int J Soc Econ 2011, 38(7):628-648.
• [4]Lawn J, Cousens S, Zupan J: 4 million neonatal deaths: when, where, why? Lancet 2005, 365(9462):891-900.
• [5]Ronsmans C, Graham W: Maternal mortality: who, when, where and why? Lancet 2006, 368:1189-1200.
• [6]Lewis G: Maternal mortality in the developing world: why do mothers really die? Obstet Med 2008, 1:2-6.
• [7]Bhutta AZ, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J, Bustreo F, Cavagnero E, Cometto G, Daelmans B, de francisco A, Fogstad H, Gupta N, Laski L, Lawn J, Maliqi B, Mason E, Pitt C, Requejo J, Starrs A, Victora CG, Wardlaw T: Countdown to 2015 Decade Report (2000–10): Taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet 2010, 375:2032-2044.
• [8]Zere E, Tumusiime P, Walker O, Kirigia J, Mwikisa C, Mbeeli T: Inequities in utilization of maternal health interventions in Namibia: implications for progress towards MDG 5 targets. Int J Equity Health 2010, 9:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Zere E, Oluwole D, Kirigia JM, Mwikisa CN, Mbeeli T: Inequities in skilled attendance at birth in Namibia: a decompositional analysis. Int J Equity Health 2011, 11:36.
• [10]Say L, Raine R: A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 85:812-819.
• [11]Ghana Statistical Services (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), & Macro International: Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2007. GSS, GHS, and Macro International, Calverton, Maryland, USA; 2009.
• [12]Penfold S, Harrison E, Bell J, Fitzmaurice A: Evaluation of the delivery fee exemption policy in Ghana: Population estimates of changes in delivery service utilization in two regions. Ghana Med J 2007, 41:100-109.
• [13]Thaddeus S, Maine D: Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38:1091-1110.
• [14]Bosu WK, Bell SJ, Armar-Klemesu M, Tornui AJ: Effect of delivery care user Fee exemption policy on institutional maternal deaths in the Central and Volta Regions of Ghana. Ghana Med J 2007, 41(3):118-123.
• [15]Dzakpasu S, Soremekun S, Manu A, Asbroek G, Tawiah C, Hurt L, Fenty J, Owusu-Agyei S, Hill Z, Campbell OMR, Kirkwood RB: Impact of free delivery care on health facility delivery and insurance coverage in Ghana’s Brong Ahafo region. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(11):e49430.
• [16]Schieber G, Cashin C, Saleh K, Lavado R: Health Financing in Ghana. World Bank, Washington, DC; 2012.
• [17]De Allegri M, Ridde V, Louis RV, Sarker M, Tiendrebéogo J, Yé M, Müller O, Jahn A: Determinants of utilization of maternal care services after the reduction of user fees: A case study from rural Burkina Faso. Health Policy 2010, 10:10.
• [18]World Health Organization: World Health Report. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2010.
• [19]Bowling A: Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services. Open University Press, New York; 2009.
• [20]Lise R, Samuelsen H: Muted voices: HIV/AIDS and the young people of Burkina Faso and Senegal. Afr J AIDs Res 2004, 3:103-112.
• [21]Oppermannt M: Triangulation – A Methodological Discussion. Int J Tour Res 2000, 2:141-146.
• [22]Attride-Stirling J: Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res 2001, 1(3):385-405.
• [23]Miles MB, Huberman M: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (2nd Edition). Sage, Beverly Hills, CA; 1994.
• [24]Bradley HE, Curry AL, Devers JK: Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes and theory. Health Res Educ Trust 2006, 42(4):1758-1772.
• [25]Boyatzis R: Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic and Code Development. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA; 1998.
• [26]Gulliford M, Figueroa-Munozand J, Morgan M: Introduction: meaning of ‘access’ in health care. In Access to Health Care. Edited by Gulliford M, Morgan M. Routledge, London; 2003.
• [27]Ansong-Tornui J, Armar-Klemesu M, Arhinful D, Penfold S, Hussein J: Hospital based maternity care in Ghana – Findings of a confidential enquiry into maternal deaths. Ghana Med J 2007, 41(3):125-132.
• [28]Turkson PK: Perceived qualitative of care delivery in a rural district of Ghana. Ghana Med J 2009, 43(2):65-70.
• [29]Saleh K: The Health Sector in Ghana: A Comprehensive Assessment. Washington, DC, World Bank; 2013.
• [30]Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvowhy Z: Do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med 1998, 47(11):1781-1795.
• [31]d’Oliveira AFPL, Diniz SG, Scraiber LB: Violence against women in healthcare institutions: an emerging problem. Lancet 2002, 359(9318):1681-1685.
• [32]Oyerinde K, Harding Y, Amara P, Garbrah-Aidoo N, Kanu R, Oulare M, Shoo R, Daoh K: Barriers to uptake of emergency obstetric and newborn care services in Sierra Leone: A qualitative study. Community Med Health Educ 2012, 2(5):149.
• [33]Matsuoka S, Aiga H, Rasmey HL, Rathavy T, Akitsu A: Perceived barriers to maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health Policy 2010, 95:255-263.
• [34]Kabakian-Khasholian T, Cambell O, Shediac-rizkallah M, Ghorayeb F: Women’s experience of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity? Soc Sci Med 2000, 51:103-113.
• [35]Mathole T, Shamu S: Maternal healthcare in Zimbabwe. In Childbirth Across Cultures: Ideas and Practices of Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Postpartum. Edited by Selin H, Stone PK. Springer, London & New York; 2009.
• [36]Burls A: Public participation in public health decisions. In Ethics in Public and Community Health. Edited by Bradley P, Burls A. Routledge, London; 2000.
• [37]Walraven G, Telfer M, Rowley J, Ronsmans C: Maternal mortality in rural Gambia: levels, causes and contributing factors. Bull World Health Organ 2000, 78:603-613.
• [38]Stekelenburg J, Roosmalen JV: The maternal mortality review meeting: experiences from Kalabo district hospital, Zambia. Trop Dr 2002, 32:219-223.
• [39]Cham M, Sundby J, Vangen S: Maternal mortality in rural Gambia: a qualitative study on access to emergency obstetric care. Reprod Health 2005, 2(3):1-8.
• [40]Denzin NK, Lincoln YS: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (2nd Edition). Edited by Denzin NK, Lincoln Y. Sage, London; 2003.