A qualitative study on the term CAM: is there a need to reinvent the wheel?

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Marja Verhoef³  Karine Toupin April²  Isabelle Gaboury¹ 

[1] Centre de recherche clinique Étienne-Lebel, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada;University of Ottawa, Institute of Population Health, Ottawa, Canada;Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

关键词: Integrative healthcare;    International experts;    Focus group;    Term;    Definition;   

Others  :  1232077
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6882-12-131

 received in 2012-04-30, accepted in 2012-08-09,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

As complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has developed extensively, uncertainty about the appropriateness of the terms CAM and other CAM-related terms has grown both in the research and practice communities. Various terms and definitions have been proposed over the last three decades, highlighting how little agreement exits in the field. Contextual use of current terms and their respective definitions needs to be discussed and addressed.

Methods

Relying upon the results of a large international Delphi survey on the adequacy of the term CAM, a focus group of 13 international experts in the field of CAM was held. A forum was also set up for 28 international experts to discuss and refine proposed definitions of both CAM and integrative healthcare (IHC) terms. Audio recordings of the meeting and forum discussion threads were analyzed using interpretive description.

Results

Multiple terms to describe the therapies, products, and disciplines often referred to as CAM, were considered. Even though participants generally agreed there is a lack of optimal definitions for popular CAM-related umbrella terms and that all terms that have so far been introduced are to some extent problematic, CAM and IHC remained the most popular and accepted terms by far. The names of the specific disciplines were also deemed adequate in certain contexts. Focus group participants clarified the context in which those three terms are appropriate. Existing and emergent definitions of both CAM and integrative healthcare terms were discussed.

Conclusions

CAM and other related terms could be used more effectively, provided they are used in the proper context. It appears difficult for the time being to reach a consensus on the definition of the term CAM due to the uncertainty of the positioning of CAM in the contemporary healthcare systems. While umbrella terms such as CAM and IHC are useful in the context of research, policy making and education, relevant stakeholders should limit the use of those terms.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Gaboury et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Johnson C: Health care transitions: a review of integrated, integrative, and integration concepts. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009, 32(9):703-713.
• [2]Gates RA, Fink RM: Oncology nursing secrets: 3rd ed. Mosby, Maryland Heights; 2007.
• [3]Caspi O, Sechrest L, Pitluk HC, Marshall CL, Bell IR, Nichter M: On the definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine: societal mega-stereotypes vs. the patients' perspectives. [Review] [48 refs]. Altern Ther Health Med 2003, 9(6):58-62.
• [4]Barrett B: Alternative, complementary, and conventional medicine: is integration upon us? J Altern Complement Med 2003, 9(3):417-427.
• [5]Weidenhammer W, Lewith G, Falkenberg T, Fonnebo V, Johannessen H, Reiter B, Uehleke B, von Ammon K, Baumhofener F, Brinkhaus B: EU FP7 project 'CAMbrella' to build European research network for complementary and alternative medicine. Forsch Komplementmed 2011, 18(2):69-76.
• [6]Fennell D, Liberato AS, Zsembik B: Definitions and patterns of CAM use by the lay public. Complement Ther Med 2009, 17(1873–6963; 2):71-77.
• [7]Ernst E, Resch KL, Mills S, Hill R, Mitchell A, Willoughby M, White A: COmplementary medicine - a definition. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1995, 45(398):506-506.
• [8]Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL: Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med 1993, 328(0028–4793; 4):246-252.
• [9]National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine: What Is Complementary and Alternative Medicine?. http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam webcite Retrieved Aug 20th, 2012.
• [10]Zollman C, Vickers A: ABC of complementary medicine. Users and practitioners of complementary medicine. BMJ 1999, 319(0959–8138; 7213):836-838.
• [11]World Health Organization: Traditional medicine: definitions. http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/traditional/definitions/en/. webcite Retrieved Aug 20th, 2012.
• [12]Wieland LS, Manheimer E, Berman BM: Development and classification of an operational definition of complementary and alternative medicine for the Cochrane collaboration. Altern Ther Health Med 2011, 17(2):50-59.
• [13]Morgan L: Is chiropractic a CAM therapy or is it a separate profession? J Can Chiropr Assoc 2005, 49(3):133-136.
• [14]MacAdam M: Frameworks of Integrated Care for the Elderly: A Systematic Review. 2008, i-29.
• [15]Leatt P: Integrated Service Delivery. Ottawa, Health Canada; 2002.
• [16]Gaboury I, Toupin April K, Verhoef M: Is the label CAM still adequate: A Delphi survey. Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Complementary Medicine Research, Tromso (Norway); 2010.
• [17]Flesch H: Silent voices: women, complementary medicine, and the co-optation of change. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2007, 13(3):166-173.
• [18]Hollenberg D, Muzzin L: Epistemological challenges to integrative medicine: An anti-colonial perspective on the combination of complementary/alternative medicine with biomedicine. Health Sociology Review 2010, 19(1):34-56.
• [19]Kelner M, Wellman B, Boon H, Welsh S: Responses of established healthcare to the professionalization of complementary and alternative medicine in Ontario. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59(0277–9536; 5):915-930.
• [20]Tataryn DJ, Verhoef MJ: Combining conventional, complementary, and alternative health care: a vision of integration. Perspectives on complementary and alternative health care: a collection of papers prepared for Health Canada. 2001, II:87-109. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/pcahc-pacps/pdf/comp_combine.pdf webcite, Retrieved Aug 20th, 2012
• [21]Kronenberg F, Cushman LF, Wade CM, Kalmuss D, Chao MT: Race/ethnicity and women's use of complementary and alternative medicine in the United States: results of a national survey. Am J Public Health 2006, 96(7):1236-1242.
• [22]Kuo GM, Hawley ST, Weiss LT, Balkrishnan R, Volk RJ: Factors associated with herbal use among urban multiethnic primary care patients: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Complement Altern Med 2004, 4:18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Contandriopoulos AP, Denis JL, Touati N, Rodriguez C: The integration of health care: Dimensions and Implementation: Working Paper. 2003. http://nelhin.on.ca/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=2618 N04-01 webcite, Accessed August 20th, 2012
• [24]Contandriopoulos AP, Champagne F, Denis JL, Avargues MC: Evaluation in the health sector: concepts and methods. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2000, 48(6):517-539.