期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Associations between reporting of cancer alarm symptoms and socioeconomic and demographic determinants: a population-based, cross-sectional study
Jens Søndergaard2  Dorte Ejg Jarbøl2  Henrik Støvring1  Bjarne Lühr Hansen2  Pia Veldt Larsen2  Maja Skov Paulsen2  Rikke Pilsgaard Svendsen2 
[1] Department of Public Health, Biostatistics, University of Aarhus, Bartholins Allé 2, Bldg 1261, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark;Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløwsvej 9A, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark
关键词: Urinary tract cancer;    Signs and symptoms;    Socioeconomic factors;    Lung cancer;    Cross-sectional survey;    Colorectal cancer;    Breast cancer;   
Others  :  1163233
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-686
 received in 2012-03-06, accepted in 2012-08-13,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Reporting of symptoms which may signal cancer is the first step in the diagnostic pathway of cancer diseases. Cancer alarm symptoms are common in the general population. Public awareness and knowledge of cancer symptoms are sparse, however, and many people do not seek medical help when having possible cancer symptoms. As social inequality is associated with cancer knowledge, cancer awareness, and information-seeking, our hypothesis is that social inequality may also exist in the general population with respect to reporting of cancer alarm symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate possible associations between socioeconomic and demographic determinants and reporting of common cancer alarm symptoms.

Methods

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed based on a stratified sample of the Danish general population. A total of 13 777 randomly selected persons aged 20 years and older participated. Our main outcome measures were weighted prevalence estimates of self-reporting one of the following cancer alarm symptoms during the preceding 12 months: a lump in the breast, coughing for more than 6 weeks, seen blood in urine, or seen blood in stool. Logistic regression models were used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the associations between each covariate and reporting of cancer alarm symptoms.

Results

A total of 2 098 (15.7%) of the participants reported one or more cancer alarm symptoms within the preceding 12 months.

Women, subjects out of the workforce, and subjects with a cancer diagnosis had statistically significantly higher odds of reporting one or more cancer alarm symptoms. Subjects with older age and subjects living with a partner had lower odds of reporting one or more cancer alarm symptoms. When analysing the four alarm symptoms of cancer separately most tendencies persisted.

Conclusions

Socioeconomic and demographic determinants are associated with self-reporting of common cancer alarm symptoms.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Svendsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413093536697.pdf 275KB PDF download
Figure 1. 27KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]The Danish National board of health: The Danish National board of health. - Denmark: National cancer Plan II; 2005. 9-12-2009. Ref Type: Report
  • [2]Fijten GH, Blijham GH, Knottnerus JA: Occurrence and clinical significance of overt blood loss per rectum in the general population and in medical practice. Br J Gen Pract 1994, 44:320-325.
  • [3]Svendsen RP, Stovring H, Hansen BL, Kragstrup J, Sondergaard J, Jarbol DE: Prevalence of cancer alarm symptoms: a population-based cross-sectional study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2010, 28:132-137.
  • [4]Eslick GD, Kalantar JS, Talley NJ: Rectal bleeding: epidemiology, associated risk factors, and health care seeking behaviour: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis 2009, 11:921-926.
  • [5]Simon AE, Waller J, Robb K, Wardle J: Patient delay in presentation of possible cancer symptoms: the contribution of knowledge and attitudes in a population sample from the United kingdom. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010, 19:2272-2277.
  • [6]Hamilton W, Sharp D: Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines. Fam Pract 2004, 21:99-106.
  • [7]Power E, Simon A, Juszczyk D, Hiom S, Wardle J: Assessing awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK. BMC Cancer 2011, 11:366. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [8]Yardley C, Glover C, len-Mersh TG: Demographic factors associated with knowledge of colorectal cancer symptoms in a UK population-based survey. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000, 82:205-209.
  • [9]Berkman L, Epstein AM: Beyond health care–socioeconomic status and health. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:2509-2510.
  • [10]Protiere C, Moumjid N, Bouhnik AD, Le Corroller Soriano AG, Moatti JP: Heterogeneity of Cancer Patient Information-Seeking Behaviors. Med Decis Making 2012, 32(2):362-75. Epub 2011 Aug 24
  • [11]Dalton SO, Schuz J, Engholm G, Johansen C, Kjaer SK, Steding-Jessen M, et al.: Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: Summary of findings. Eur J Cancer 2008, 44:2074-2085.
  • [12]Statistics Denmark: StatBank Denmark. 2009, 8-12. Ref Type: Online Source
  • [13]Frank L: Epidemiology, When an entire country is a cohort. Science 2000, 287:2398-2399.
  • [14] : The Danish National board of health. Copenhagen: Cancerregisteret 2007; 2009. Ref Type: Report
  • [15]Jones R, Latinovic R, Charlton J, Gulliford MC: Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database. BMJ 2007, 334:1040.
  • [16]Salzman BE, Lamb K, Olszewski RF, Tully A, Studdiford J: Diagnosing cancer in the symptomatic patient. Prim Care 2009, 36:651-670.
  • [17]Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW: Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130:651-657.
  • [18]Beckles MA, Spiro SG, Colice GL, Rudd RM: Initial evaluation of the patient with lung cancer: symptoms, signs, laboratory tests, and paraneoplastic syndromes. Chest 2003, 123:97S-104S.
  • [19]Statistics Denmark. Statistics Denmark. 2011. Ref Type: Online Source
  • [20]Rasmussen JN, Rasmussen S, Gislason GH, Buch P, Abildstrom SZ, Kober L, et al.: Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006, 60:351-356.
  • [21]Rasmussen JN, Rasmussen S, Gislason GH, Abildstrom SZ, Schramm TK, Torp-Pedersen C, et al.: Persistent socio-economic differences in revascularization after acute myocardial infarction despite a universal health care system-a Danish study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2007, 21:449-457.
  • [22]Rasmussen JN, Gislason GH, Rasmussen S, Abildstrom SZ, Schramm TK, Kober L, et al.: Use of statins and beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 61:1091-1097.
  • [23]Paulsen MS, Andersen M, Munck AP, Larsen PV, Hansen DG, Jacobsen IA, et al.: Socio-economic status influences blood pressure control despite equal access to care. Fam Pract 2012. Epub ahead of print
  • [24]Dalton SO, Steding-Jessen M, Gislum M, Frederiksen K, Engholm G, Schuz J: Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: Background, aims, material and methods. Eur J Cancer 2008, 44:1938-1949.
  • [25]Simon AE, Juszczyk D, Smyth N, Power E, Hiom S, Peake MD, et al.: Knowledge of lung cancer symptoms and risk factors in the U.K.: development of a measure and results from a population-based survey. Thorax 2012, 67:426-432.
  • [26]Low EL, Simon AE, Lyons J, Romney-Alexander D, Waller J: What do British women know about cervical cancer symptoms and risk factors? Eur J Cancer 2012. Epub ahead of print
  • [27]Hannay DR: Symptom prevalence in the community. J R Coll Gen Pract 1978, 28:492-499.
  • [28]Kroenke K, Price RK: Symptoms in the community. Prevalence, classification, and psychiatric comorbidity. Arch Intern Med 1993, 153:2474-2480.
  • [29]Krantz G, Ostergren PO: Common symptoms in middle aged women: their relation to employment status, psychosocial work conditions and social support in a Swedish setting. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54:192-199.
  • [30]McAteer A, Elliott AM, Hannaford PC: Ascertaining the size of the symptom iceberg in a UK-wide community-based survey. Br J Gen Pract 2011, 61:e1-e11.
  • [31]van Wijk CM, Kolk AM: Sex differences in physical symptoms: the contribution of symptom perception theory. Soc Sci Med 1997, 45:231-246.
  • [32]Crosland A, Jones R: Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour. BMJ 1995, 311:486-488.
  • [33]Hickey T: Self-care behavior of older adults. Family & Community Health: The Journal of Health Promotion & Maintenance 1988, 11(3):23-32.
  • [34]Smith SM, Campbell NC, Macleod U, Lee AJ, Raja A, Wyke S, et al.: Factors contributing to the time taken to consult with symptoms of lung cancer: a cross-sectional study. Thorax 2009, 64:523-531.
  • [35]James WP, Nelson M, Ralph A, Leather S: Socioeconomic determinants of health. The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. BMJ 1997, 314:1545-1549.
  • [36]Bartley M: Unemployment and ill health: understanding the relationship. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994, 48:333-337.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:9次