User experiences with clinical social franchising: qualitative insights from providers and clients in Ghana and Kenya

BMC Health Services Research

Dominic Montagu¹  Christina Briegleb¹  Maia Sieverding¹ 

[1] Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

关键词: Kenya;    Ghana;    Provider choice;    Client satisfaction;    Provider experience;    Private sector;    Clinical social franchise;   

Others  :  1118105
DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-015-0709-3

 received in 2014-09-01, accepted in 2015-01-19,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Clinical social franchising is a rapidly growing delivery model in private healthcare markets in low- and middle-income countries. Despite this growth, little is known about providers’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of social franchising or clients’ reasons for choosing franchised facilities over other healthcare options. We examine these questions in the context of three social franchise networks in Ghana and Kenya.

Methods

We conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of providers from the BlueStar Ghana, and Amua and Tunza networks in Kenya. We also conducted qualitative exit interviews with female clients who were leaving franchised facilities after a visit for a reproductive or child health reason. The total sample consists of 47 providers and 47 clients across the three networks.

Results

Providers perceived the main benefits of participation in a social franchise network to be training opportunities and access to a consistent supply of low-cost family planning commodities; few providers mentioned branding as a benefit of participation. Although most providers said that client flows for franchised services increased after joining the network, they did not associate this with improved finances for their facility. Clients overwhelmingly cited the quality of the client-provider relationship as their main motivation for attending the franchise facility. Recognition of the franchise brand was low among clients who were exiting a franchised facility.

Conclusions

The most important benefit of social franchise programs to both providers and their clients may have more to do with training on business practices, patient counseling and customer service, than with subsidies, technical input, branding or clinical support. This finding may lead to a reconsideration of how franchise programs interact with both their member clinics and the larger health-seeking communities they serve.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Sieverding et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Viswanathan R, Schatzkin E, Sprockett A: Clinical social franchising compendium: an annual survey of programs: findings from 2013. Global Health Group University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; 2014.
• [2]Beyeler N, De La Cruz AY, Montagu D: The impact of clinical social franchising on health services in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One 2013, 8:e60669.
• [3]Montagu D: Franchising of health services in low-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2002, 17:121-30.
• [4]Stephenson R, Tsui AO, Sulzbach S, Bardsley P, Bekele G, Giday T, Ahmed R, Gopalkrishnan G, Feyesitan B: Franchising reproductive health services. Health Serv Res 2004, 39(6 Pt 2):2053-80.
• [5]Agha S, Gage A, Balal A: Changes in perceptions of quality of, and access to, services among clients of a fractional franchise network in Nepal. J Biosoc Sci 2007, 39:341.
• [6]Nijmeijer KJ, Fabbricotti IN, Huijsman R: Is franchising in health care valuable? A systematic review. Health Policy Plan 2014, 29(2):164-76. Epub 2013 Jan 22
• [7]Montagu D: Franchising of family planning and reproductive health services in developing countries. PhD Thesis. University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; 2003.
• [8]O'Connell K, Hom M, Aung T, Theuss M, Huntington D: Using and Joining a Franchised Private Sector Provider Network in Myanmar. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(12):e28364.
• [9]Huntington D, Mundy G, Hom NM, Li Q, Aung T: Physicians in private practice: reasons for being a social franchise member. Health Res Policy Syst 2012, 10:25. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Shah NM: Review of PSI research on private sector providers: Key findings, lessons learned and recommendations. PSI, Washington, D.C.; 2011.
• [11]Ngo AD, Alden DL, Hang N, Dinh N: Developing and launching the government social franchise model of reproductive health care service delivery in Vietnam. Soc Mark Q 2009, 15:71-89.
• [12]Decker M, Montagu D: Reaching youth through franchise clinics: assessment of Kenyan private sector involvement in youth services. J Adolesc Health 2007, 40:280-2.
• [13]D’Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussein J: Please understand when I cry out in pain: women’s accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health 2005, 5:140. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Hutchinson PL, Do M, Agha S: Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: A comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:203. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Fotso JC, Mukiira C: Perceived quality of and access to care among poor urban women in Kenya and their utilization of delivery care: harnessing the potential of private clinics? Health Policy Plan 2012, 27(6):505-15. Epub 2011 Nov 10
• [16]Agha S, Do M: The quality of family planning services and client satisfaction in the public and private sectors in Kenya. Int J Qual Health Care 2009, 21(2):87-96. Epub 2009 Feb 3
• [17]Marie Stopes International: Amua network, Marie stopes Kenya. Marie Stopes International, Nairobi; 2010.
• [18]Population Services International: Tunza health network, PSI Kenya. Population Services International, Nairobi; 2010.
• [19]Montagu D, Kinlaw H: Clinical social franchising case studies series: BlueStar Ghana, Marie stopes international. Global Health Group University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; 2009.
• [20]Bishai DM, Shah NM, Walker DG, Brieger WR, Peters DH: Social franchising to improve quality and access in private health care in developing countries. Harv Health Policy Rev 2008, 9:184-97.
• [21]Das J, Holla A, Das V, Mohanan M, Tabak D, Chan B: In urban and rural India, a standardized patient study showed low levels of provider training and huge quality gaps. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012, 31:2774-84.
• [22]Das J, Hammer J, Leonard K: The quality of medical advice in low-income countries. J Econ Perspect 2008, 22:93-114.
• [23]Leonard DK, Bloom G, Hanson K, O’Farrell J, Spicer N: Institutional solutions to the asymmetric information problem in health and development services for the poor. World Dev 2013, 48:71-87.