Migration-related detention centers: the challenges of an ecological perspective with a focus on justice

BMC International Health and Human Rights

Caterina Arcidiacono¹  José Ornelas²  Francesca Esposito² 

[1] Department of Humanities, Federico II University of Naples, Via Porta di Massa, 1, Naples, 80133, Italy;ISPA, University Institute, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 32, Lisbon, 1137-039, Portugal

关键词: Human rights;    Equality;    Health;    Justice;    Ecological perspective;    Undocumented migration;    Migration-related detention;   

Others  :  1217892
DOI  :  10.1186/s12914-015-0052-0

 received in 2014-07-23, accepted in 2015-05-21,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

In recent years, border control and migration-related detention have become increasingly widespread practices affecting the lives of undocumented migrants, their families, and communities at large. In spite of the concern within academia, few studies have directly witnessed the life and experiences of people confined to migration-related detention centers. In the medical and psychological fields, a considerable body of research has demonstrated the pathogenic nature of detention in terms of mental health, showing an association between length of detention and severity of distress. Nevertheless, it was limited to the assessment of individuals’ clinical consequences, mainly focusing on asylum seekers. There currently exists a need to adopt an ecological perspective from which to study detained migrants’ experiences as context-dependent, and influenced by power inequalities. This paper addresses this gap.

Discussion

Drawing upon advances in community psychology, we illustrate an ecological framework for the study of migration-related detention contexts, and their effects on the lives of detained migrants and all people exposed to them. Making use of existing literature, Kelly’s four principles (interdependence, cycling of resources, adaptation, succession) are analyzed at multiple ecological levels (personal, interpersonal, organizational, communal), highlighting implications for future research in this field. A focus on justice, as a key-dimension of analysis, is also discussed. Wellbeing is acknowledged as a multilevel, dynamic, and value-dependent phenomenon.

Summary

In presenting this alternative framework, the potential for studying migration-related detention through an ecological lens is highlighted, pointing the way for future fields of study. We argue that ecological multilevel analyses, conceptualized in terms of interdependent systems and with a focus on justice, can enhance the comprehension of the dynamics at play in migration-related detention centers, providing an effective tool to address the multi-level challenges of doing research within them. Furthermore, they can contribute to the development of policies and practices concerned with health, equality, and human rights of all people exposed to migration-related detention. Consistent with these assumptions, empirical studies adopting such a framework are strongly encouraged. These studies should use mixed and multi-method culturally situated designs, based on the development of collaborative and empowering relationships with participants. Ethnographic approaches are recommended.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Esposito et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Report of the special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, regional study: management of the external borders of the european union and its impact on the human rights of migrants (UN Doc a/HRC/23/46). United Nations, New York; 2013.
• [2]Fassin D: Social illegitimacy as a foundation of health inequality: How the political treatment of immigrants illuminates a French paradox. In Unhealthy Health Policy: A Critical Anthropological Examination. Edited by Castro A, Singer M. Walnut Creek, CA: Altimir Press; 2004:203–214.
• [3]Watters C, Ingleby D. Locations of care: Meeting the mental health and social care needs of refugees in Europe. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2004; 27:549-570.
• [4]Becerra D, Androff DK, Ayón C, Castillo JT: Fear vs. Facts: Examining the Economic Impact of Undocumented Immigrants in the U.S. J Sociol Soc Welf 2012, XXXIX(4):111–136.
• [5]Grove N, Zwi A. Our health and theirs: Forced migration, othering and public health. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62:1931-1942.
• [6]Bosworth M, Fili A, Pickering S: Women’s Immigration Detention in Greece: Gender, Control, and Capacity. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2297440.
• [7]Hacker K, Chu J, Leung C, Marra R, Pirie A, Brahimi M et al.. The impact of immigration and customs enforcement on immigrant health: perceptions of immigrants in Everett, Massachusetts. USA Soc Sci Med. 2011; 73(4):586-594.
• [8]Hall A. Border watch. Cultures of immigration, detention, and control. Pluto Press, London; 2012.
• [9]Castañeda H. Illegality as risk factor: a survey of unauthorized migrant patients in a Berlin clinic. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(8):1552-1560.
• [10]Magalhaes L, Carrasco C, Gastaldo D. Undocumented migrants in Canada: a scope literature review on health, access to services, and working conditions. J Immigr Minor Heal. 2011; 12(1):132-151.
• [11]McGuire S, Georges J. Undocumentedness and liminality as health variables. Adv Nurs Sci. 2003; 26(3):185-195.
• [12]Global Detention Project [http://www.globaldetentionproject.org/about/about-the-project.html]
• [13]Coffey GJ, Kaplan I, Sampson RC, Tucci MM. The meaning and mental health consequences of long-term immigration detention for people seeking asylum. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70:2070-2079.
• [14]Bosworth M, Kellezi B. Developing a measure of the quality of life in detention. Prison Serv J. 2013; 205:10-15.
• [15]Keller AS, Rosenfeld B, Trinh-Shevrin C, Meserve C, Sachs E, Leviss JA et al.. Mental health of detained asylum seekers. Lancet. 2003; 362(9397):1721-1723.
• [16]Robjant K, Hassan R, Katona C. Mental health implications of detaining asylum seekers: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2009; 194:306-312.
• [17]Bosworth M. Subjectivity and identity in detention: Punishment and society in a global age. Theor Criminol. 2012; 16(2):123-140.
• [18]Bosworth M: Researching Immigration Detention. [http://bordercriminologies.law.ox.ac.uk/researching-immigration-detention/]
• [19]Ichikawa M, Nakahara S, Wakai S. Effect of post-migration detention on mental health among Afghan asylum seekers in Japan. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006; 40(4):341-346.
• [20]Momartin S, Steel Z, Coello M, Aroche J, Silove DM, Brooks R. A comparison of the mental health of refugees with temporary versus permanent protection visas. Med J Aust. 2006; 185(7):357-361.
• [21]Sobhanian F, Boyle GJ, Bahr M, Fallo T. Psychological status of former refugee detainees from the woomera detention centre Now living in the Australian community. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2006; 13(2):151-159.
• [22]Steel Z, Silove D, Brooks R, Momartin S, Alzuhairi B, Susljik I. Impact of immigration detention and temporary protection on the mental health of refugees. Br J Psychiatry. 2006; 188:58-64.
• [23]Steel Z, Momartin S, Bateman C, Hafshejani A, Silove DM, Everson N et al.. Psychiatric status of asylum seeker families held for a protracted period in a remote detention centre in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004; 28(6):527-36.
• [24]Mares S, Jureidini J. Psychiatric assessment of children and families in immigration detention–clinical, administrative and ethical issues. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004; 28(6):520-526.
• [25]Robjant K, Robbins I, Senior V. Psychological distress amongst immigration detainees: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Br J Clin Psychol. 2009; 48:275-286.
• [26]Steel Z, Momartin S, Silove D, Coello M, Aroche J, Wei Tay K. Two year psychosocial and mental health outcomes for refugees subjected to restrictive or supportive immigration policies. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72(7):1149-1156.
• [27]Steel Z, Silove D. The mental health implications of detaining asylum seekers. Med J Aust. 2001; 175:596-599.
• [28]Keller A, Ford D, Sachs E, Rosenfeld B, Meserve C, Thrinh Shevrin Drph C, Rocklin P, Leviss J, Allden K, Kim G, Smith H, Wilkinson J, Singer E, Cajee M: From Persecution to Prison: the Health Consequences of Detention for Asylum Seekers. Boston and New York: Physicians for Human Rights and the Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture; 2003. available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/PHR_Reports/persecution-to-prison-US-2003.pdf.
• [29]Sultan A, O'Sullivan K. Psychological disturbances in asylum seekers held in long term detention: a participant-observer account. Med J Aust. 2001; 175:593-596.
• [30]Bosworth M, Kellezi B: Quality of Life in Detention: Results from the MQLD Questionnaire Data Collected in IRC Yarl’s Wood, IRC Tinsley House and IRC Brook House, August 2010 – June 2011. Oxford: Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford; 2012. available at http://bordercriminologies.law.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/finalmqld.pdf.
• [31]McGregor J. Contestations and consequences of deportability: hunger strikes and the political agency of non-citizens. Citizensh Stud. 2011; 15(5):597-611.
• [32]Sarason SB. An asocial psychology and a misdirected clinical psychology. Am Psychol. 1981; 36(8):827-836.
• [33]Sládková J, Bond MA. Migration as a context-dependent dynamic in a world of global inequalities. Psychosoc Interv. 2011; 20(3):327-332.
• [34]Thurston WE, Verhoef MJ. Occupational injury among immigrants. J Int Migr Integr. 2003; 4(1):105-123.
• [35]Thurston WE, Vissandjée B. An ecological model for understanding culture as a determinant of women’s health. Crit Public Health. 2005; 15(3):229-242.
• [36]Tseng V, Yoshikawa H. Reconceptualizing acculturation: ecological processes, historical contexts, and power inequities. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 42:355-358.
• [37]Barker R. Ecological psychology: concepts and methods for studying human behavior. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA; 1968.
• [38]Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; 1979.
• [39]Lewin K. Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. Harper & Row, New York; 1951.
• [40]Moos RH. The human context: environmental determinants of behavior. Wiley, New York; 1976.
• [41]Trickett EJ. Toward a distinctive community psychology : an ecological metaphor for the conduct of community research and the nature of training. Am J Community Psychol. 1984; 12(3):261-279.
• [42]Kelly JG. Ecological constraints on mental health services. Am Psychol. 1966; 21:535-539.
• [43]Kelly JG: Toward an ecological conception of preventive interventions. In Research contributions from psychology to community mental health. Edited by Carter Jr. JW. New York: Behavioral Publications; 1968:75–99.
• [44]Kelly JG: Wellness as an ecological enterprise. In The promotion of wellness in children and adolescent. Edited by Cicchetti D, Rappaport J, Sandler J, Weissberg RJ. Washington, DC: CWLA Press; 2000:101–132
• [45]Kelly JG. Becoming ecological: an expedition into community psychology. Oxford University Press, New York; 2006.
• [46]Trickett EJ. A future for community psychology: The contexts of diversity and the diversity of contexts. Am J Community Psychol. 1996; 24(2):209-234.
• [47]Trickett EJ, Kelly JG, Vincent TA: The spirit of ecological inquiry in community research. In Community research: Methods, paradigms, and applications. Edited by Klein D, Susskind E. New York: Praeger; 1985:283–332.
• [48]Trickett EJ, Rowe HL. Emerging ecological approaches to prevention, health promotion, and public health in the school context: next steps from a community psychology perspective. J Educ Psychol Consult. 2012; 22:125-140.
• [49]Campbell R, Patterson D, Fehler-Cabral G. Using ecological theory to evaluate the effectiveness of an indigenous community intervention: a study of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs. Am J Community Psychol. 2010; 46:263-76.
• [50]Kelly JG. Adolescent boys in high school: A psychological study of coping and adaptation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ; 1979.
• [51]Peirson LJ, Boydell KM, Ferguson HB, Ferris LE. An ecological process model of systems change. Am J Community Psychol. 2011; 47:307-321.
• [52]Toro PA, Trickett EJ, Wall DD, Salem DA. Homelessness in the United States. An ecological perspective Am Psychol. 1991; 46(11):1208-1218.
• [53]Prilleltensky I. Migrant well-being is a multilevel, dynamic, value dependent phenomenon. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 42:359-364.
• [54]Prilleltensky I, Arcidiacono C. Benessere, Giustizia e Potere nella vita degli immigrati. Riv di Psicol di Comunità. 2010; 1:11-22.
• [55]Prilleltensky I. Wellness as fairness. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 49:1-21.
• [56]Silove D, Steel Z, Mollica R. Detention of asylum seekers: assault on health, human rights, and social development. Lancet. 2001; 357:1436-1437.
• [57]Fazel M, Silove D. Detention of refugees. Br Med J. 2006; 332:251-252.
• [58]Brabeck K, Qingwen X. The impact of detention and deportation on Latino immigrant children and families: a quantitative exploration. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2010; 32(3):341-361.
• [59]Hagan J, Eschbach K, Rodriguez N. U.S.: deportation policy, family separation, and circular migration. Int Migr Rev. 2008; 42(1):64-88.
• [60]Sládková J, Mangado SMG, Quinteros JR. Lowell immigrant communities in the climate of deportations. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2012; 12(1):78-95.
• [61]Thronson DB. Creating crisis: immigration raids and the destabilization of immigrant families. Wake Forest Law Rev. 2008; 43:391-418.
• [62]Di Martino A, Biondi Dal Monte F, Boiano I, Raffaelli R. The criminalization of irregular immigration: law and practice in Italy. Pisa University Press, Pisa; 2013.
• [63]Sarason SB: The Psychological Sense of Community: Prospects for a Community Psychology. 1st edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1974
• [64]McMillan DW, Chavis DM. Sense of community: a definition and theory. J Community Psychol. 1986; 14(1):6-23.
• [65]Sonn CC, Fisher AT. Psychological sense of community in a politically constructed group. J Community Psychol. 1996; 24:417-430.
• [66]Brodsky AE, Marx CM. Layers of identity: multiple psychological senses of community within a community setting. J Community Psychol. 2001; 29(2):161-178.
• [67]Bosworth M, Bradford B: Staff Perception Survey. [http://bordercriminologies.law.ox.ac.uk/reseach/current-research/staff-perception-survey/]
• [68]Bosworth M. Deportation, detention and foreign-national prisoners in England and Wales. Citizensh Stud. 2011; 15(5):583-595.
• [69]Bosworth M, Kaufman E. Foreigners in a carceral age: Immigration and imprisonment in the U.S. Stanford Law. Policy Rev. 2011; 22(1):101-127.
• [70]McGregor J. Rethinking detention and deportability: Removal centres as spaces of religious revival. Polit Geogr. 2012; 31(4):236-246.
• [71]Hall A. “These people could Be anyone”: fear, contempt (and empathy) in a British immigration removal centre. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2010; 36(6):881-898.
• [72]Cohen S, McKey G: Social Support, Stress and the Buffering Hypothesis: A Theoretical Analysis. In Handbook of Psychology and Health. Edited by Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1984:253–267.
• [73]Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985; 98(2):310-357.
• [74]Bacon C: The Evolution of Immigration Detention in the UK: The Involvement of Private Prison Companies. http://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/publications/working-paper-series/wp27-evolution-immigration-detention-uk-2005.pdf.
• [75]Alberti G. Across the borders of Lesvos: the gendering of migrants’ detention in the Aegean. Fem Rev. 2010; 94:138-147.
• [76]Bailey R. Up against the wall: bare life and resistance in Australian immigration detention. Law Crit. 2009; 20(2):113-132.
• [77]Grewcock, M: The Great Escape: Refugees, Detention and Resistance. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1553008.
• [78]Lorek A, Ehntholt K, Nesbitt A, Way E, Githinji C, Rossor E et al.. The mental and physical health difficulties of children held within a British immigration detention center: a pilot study. Child Abuse Negl. 2009; 33:573-585.
• [79]Rigby J, Schlembach R. Impossible protest: noborders in Calais. Citizensh Stud. 2013; 17(2):157-172.
• [80]Wener RE. The environmental psychology of prisons and jails: creating human spaces in secure settings. Cambridge University Press, New York; 2012.
• [81]Malloch MS, Stanley E. The detention of asylum seekers in the UK: Representing risk, managing the dangerous. Punishm Soc. 2005; 7(1):53-71.
• [82]Black R, Collyer M, Skeldon R, Waddington C. Routes to illegal residence: A case study of immigration detainees in the United Kingdom. Geoforum. 2006; 37(4):552-564.
• [83]Sladkova J. Expectations and motivations of Hondurans migrating to the united states. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2007; 17:187-202.
• [84]Ratia E, Notermans C. “I was crying, I did not come back with anything”: Women’s experiences of deportation from Europe to Nigeria. African Diaspora. 2012; 5:143-164.
• [85]Schuster L, Majidi N. What happens post-deportation? The experience of deported Afghans. Migr Stud. 2013; 1(2):221-240.
• [86]Schaufeli WB, Peeters MCW. Job stress and burnout among correctional officers: a literature review. Int J Stress Manag. 2000; 7(1):19-48.
• [87]Gould DD, Watson SL, Price SR, Valliant PM. The relationship between burnout and coping in adult and young offender center correctional officers: an exploratory investigation. Psychol Serv. 2013; 10(1):37-47.
• [88]Senter A, Morgan RD, Serna-McDonald C, Bewley M. Correctional psychologist burnout, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction. Psychol Serv. 2010; 7(3):190-201.
• [89]Crewe B. Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. Eur J Criminol. 2011; 8(6):455-468.
• [90]Liebling A, Arnold H. Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith, and the declining nature of trust. J Crim Justice. 2012; 40(5):413-424.
• [91]Sarabia H. Perpetual illegality: results of border enforcement and policies for Mexican undocumented migrants in the united states. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2012; 12(1):49-67.
• [92]Hernández CCG. The perverse logic of immigration detention: unraveling the rationality of imprisoning immigrants based on markers of race and class otherness. Colomb J Race Law. 2012; 1(3):353-364.
• [93]Border Criminologies: Identity Matters in Research. [http://bordercriminologies.law.ox.ac.uk/identity-matters-in-research/]
• [94]Border Criminologies: Ethnography as Embodied Research. [http://bordercriminologies.law.ox.ac.uk/ethnography-as-embodied-research/]
• [95]Case AD, Todd NR, Kral MJ: Ethnography in Community Psychology: Promises and Tensions. Am J Community Psychol, 2014. available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10464-014-9648-0/fulltext.html.