期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Working to improve survival and health for babies born very preterm: the WISH project protocol
Sarah McIntyre2  Jonathan Morris1  Vicki Flenady3  Tanya Bubner5  Pat Ashwood5  Emily Bain5  Philippa F Middleton5  Caroline A Crowther4 
[1] Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;Cerebral Palsy Institute, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia;Centre for Translating Research into Practice, Mater Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia;Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
关键词: Preterm birth;    Cerebral palsy;    Neuroprotection;    Magnesium sulphate;    Implementation;    Evidence-based practice;   
Others  :  1131881
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-13-239
 received in 2013-11-22, accepted in 2013-12-13,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Babies born very preterm (before 30 weeks gestation) are at high risk of dying in their first weeks of life, and those who survive are at risk of developing cerebral palsy in childhood. Recent high-quality evidence has shown that giving women magnesium sulphate immediately prior to very early birth can significantly increase the chances of their babies surviving free of cerebral palsy. In 2010 Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines recommended this therapy. The WISH (Working to Improve Survival and Health for babies born very preterm) Project aims to bi-nationally improve and monitor the use of this therapy to reduce the risk of very preterm babies dying or having cerebral palsy.

Methods/Design

The WISH Project is a prospective cohort study. The 25 Australian and New Zealand tertiary level maternity hospitals will be provided with a package of active implementation strategies to guide the introduction and local adaptation of guideline recommendations. Surveys will be conducted at individual hospitals to evaluate outcomes related to local implementation progress and the use and value of the WISH implementation strategies. For the hospitals participating in the ‘WISH audit of uptake and health outcomes data collection’, the primary health outcomes (assessed through case note review, and 24 month corrected age questionnaires) will be: the proportion of eligible women receiving antenatal magnesium sulphate; and rates of death prior to primary hospital discharge and cerebral palsy at two years corrected age in infants born to eligible mothers. For hospitals wishing to assess factors influencing translation locally, barriers and facilitators will be measured through interviews with health care professionals, to further guide implementation strategies. Study outcomes for the early phase of the project (Year 1) will be compared with the later intervention phase (Years 2 and 3).

Discussion

The WISH Project will offer insight into the effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy to improve the uptake of a novel neuroprotective therapy in obstetric clinical practice. The successful implementation of antenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection in Australia and New Zealand could lead to over 90 fewer very preterm babies dying or suffering the long-term consequences of cerebral palsy each year.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Crowther et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150303112153889.pdf 217KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Doyle LW for the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group: Outcome at 5 years of age of children 23 to 27 weeks’ gestation: refining the prognosis. Paediatrics 2001, 108(1):134-141.
  • [2]Saigal S, Doyle L: An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008, 371(9608):261-269.
  • [3]Laws P, Sullivan EA: Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2007. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) Cat No, PER 48; 2009.
  • [4]Access Economics: The Economic Impact of Cerebral Palsy in Australia in 2007. Sydney; 2008.
  • [5]Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Group: Report of the Australian Cerebral Palsy Register, Birth Years 1993–2006. Sydney; 2013.
  • [6]Stanley F: Survival and cerebral palsy in low birthweight infants: implications for perinatal care. Paediatr and Perinat Epidemiol 1992, 6(2):298-310.
  • [7]McIntyre S, Novak I, Cusick A: Consensus research priorities for cerebral palsy: a Delphi survey of consumers, researchers, and clinicians. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010, 52(3):270-275.
  • [8]Nelson KB, Grether JK: Can magnesium sulphate reduce the risk of cerebral palsy in very low birthweight infants? Paediatrics 1995, 95(2):263-269.
  • [9]Doyle LW, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Marret S, Rouse D: Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, 1:CD004661.
  • [10]Antenatal Magnesium Sulphate for Neuroprotection Guideline Development Panel: Antenatal magnesium sulphate prior to preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus, infant and child: National clinical practice guidelines. Adelaide: The University of Adelaide; 2010.
  • [11]Penney G, Foy R: Do clinical guidelines enhance safe practice in obstetrics and gynaecology? Best Prac Res Clin Ob Gyn 2007, 21(4):657-673.
  • [12]Mugford M: Corticosteroids in preterm delivery – estimated impact on neonatal outcomes and health service resources. In Oxford Regional Health Authority, A review of stillbirths and neonatal mortality in the Oxford Region. Oxford: Oxford Regional Health Authority; 1993:37-40.
  • [13]Chaillet N, Dube E, Dugas M, Audibert F, Tourigny C, Fraser WD, Dumont A: Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108(5):1234-1245.
  • [14]Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C, Vale L: Toward evidence-based quality improvement. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21(2):S14-S20.
  • [15]Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8(6):1-72.
  • [16]Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O’Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD: Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 6:CD000259.
  • [17]Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O’Brien MA, Wolf FM, Davis D, Odgaard-Jensen J, Oxman AD: Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, 2:CD003030.
  • [18]O’Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, Oxman AD, Odgaard-Jensen J, Kristoffersen DT, Forsetlund L, Bainbridge D, Freemantle N, Davis D, Haynes RB, Harvey E: Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 4:CD000409.
  • [19]Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, O’Brien MA, Grimshaw J, Eccles MP: Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 8:CD000125.
  • [20]Giguère A, Légaré F, Grimshaw J, Turcotte S, Fiander M, Grudniewicz A, Makosso-Kallyth S, Wolf FM, Farmer AP, Gagnon MP: Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 10:CD004398.
  • [21]Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999, 282(15):1458-1465.
  • [22]National Institute of Clinical Studies: Identifying barriers to evidence uptake. Melbourne; 2006.
  • [23]Bricker D, Squires J, Monts L: Ages and Stages Questionnaire. A parent completed child monitoring system. USA: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co; 1995.
  • [24]Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R: The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011, 6:42. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [25]Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 2012, 7:37. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [26]Australian Bureau of Statistics: 3301.0 Births, Australia, 2012. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3301.0 webcite
  • [27]Statistics New Zealand: Births and deaths: year ended December 2012. http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/births/BirthsAndDeaths_HOTPYeDec12.aspx webcite
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:7次