期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Measuring the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of young people
Margaret Hellard3  Maelenn Gouillou1  Megan SC Lim2  Rosanne Freak-Poli2  Anna Peeters4  Anna L Bowring1 
[1] Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia;Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia;Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, Alan Gilbert Building, 161 Barry Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia;Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
关键词: Young people;    Validity;    Obesity self-report;    Overweight;    Body mass index;    Body weight;    Body height;   
Others  :  1126441
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2288-12-175
 received in 2012-06-08, accepted in 2012-10-22,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Self-reported anthropometric data are commonly used to estimate prevalence of obesity in population and community-based studies. We aim to: 1) Determine whether survey participants are able and willing to self-report height and weight; 2) Assess the accuracy of self-reported compared to measured anthropometric data in a community-based sample of young people.

Methods

Participants (16–29 years) of a behaviour survey, recruited at a Melbourne music festival (January 2011), were asked to self-report height and weight; researchers independently weighed and measured a sub-sample. Body Mass Index was calculated and overweight/obesity classified as ≥25kg/m2. Differences between measured and self-reported values were assessed using paired t-test/Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Accurate report of height and weight were defined as <2cm and <2kg difference between self-report and measured values, respectively. Agreement between classification of overweight/obesity by self-report and measured values was assessed using McNemar’s test.

Results

Of 1405 survey participants, 82% of males and 72% of females self-reported their height and weight. Among 67 participants who were also independently measured, self-reported height and weight were significantly less than measured height (p=0.01) and weight (p<0.01) among females, but no differences were detected among males. Overall, 52% accurately self-reported height, 30% under-reported, and 18% over-reported; 34% accurately self-reported weight, 52% under-reported and 13% over-reported. More females (70%) than males (35%) under-reported weight (p=0.01). Prevalence of overweight/obesity was 33% based on self-report data and 39% based on measured data (p=0.16).

Conclusions

Self-reported measurements may underestimate weight but accurately identified overweight/obesity in the majority of this sample of young people.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Bowring et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150218144328707.pdf 225KB PDF download
Figure 1. 22KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Australian Insitute of Health and Welfare: Risk Factor Monitoring. A rising epidemic: obesity in Australian children and adolescents. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra; 2004.
  • [2]Hayes AJ, Kortt MA, Clarke PM, Brandrup JD: Estimating equations to correct self-reported height and weight: implications for prevalence of overweight and obesity in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2008, 32(6):542-545.
  • [3]Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B: A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2007, 8(4):307-326.
  • [4]Engstrom JL, Paterson SA, Doherty A, Trabulsi M, Speer KL: Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: an integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003, 48(5):338-345.
  • [5]Himes JH, Hannan P, Wall M, Neumark-Sztainer D: Factors associated with errors in self-reports of stature, weight, and body mass index in Minnesota adolescents. Ann Epidemiol 2005, 15(4):272-278.
  • [6]Wang Z, Patterson CM, Hills AP: A comparison of self-reported and measured height, weight and BMI in Australian adolescents. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002, 26(5):473-478.
  • [7]Elgar FJ, Stewart JM: Validity of self-report screening for overweight and obesity: Evidence from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Can J Public Health 2009, 99(5):423-427.
  • [8]Brener ND, McManus T, Galuska DA, Lowry R, Wechsler H: Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students. J Adolesc Health 2003, 32(4):281-287.
  • [9]Roberts RJ: Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight? Public Health 1995, 109(4):275-284.
  • [10]Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ: Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC?Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5(04):561-565.
  • [11]Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Merlo J, Lundqvist-Persson C, Rastam L, Lindblad U: The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: Implications for population studies. Obesity 2007, 15(1):197-208.
  • [12]Sherry B, Jefferds ME, Grummer-Strawn LM: Accuracy of Adolescent Self-report of Height and Weight in Assessing Overweight Status: A Literature Review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007, 161(12):1154-1161.
  • [13]Taylor AW, Grande ED, Gill TK, Chittleborough CR, Wilson DH, Adams RJ, Grant JF, Phillips P, Appleton S, Ruffin RE: How valid are self-reported height and weight? A comparison between CATI self-report and clinic measurements using a large cohort study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2006, 30(3):238-246.
  • [14]Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Morrison C: Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54(2):143-148.
  • [15]Faden VB, Day NL, Windle M, Windle R, Grube JW, Molina BSG, Pelham WE, Gnagy EM, Wilson TK, Jackson KM, et al.: Collecting Longitudinal Data Through Childhood, Adolescence, and Young Adulthood: Methodological Challenges. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004, 28(2):330-340.
  • [16]Grande E, Taylor A: Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010, 10(1):77. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [17]Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Aitken CK, Hocking JS: Surveillance of STI risk behaviour among young people attending a music festival in Australia, 2005–08. Aust N Z J Public Health 2009, 33:482-484.
  • [18]Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Hocking JS, Spelman TD, Aitken CK: Surveillance of drug use among young people attending a music festival in Australia, 2005–2008. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010, 29(2):150-156.
  • [19]Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Aitken CK, Hocking JS, Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Aitken CK, Hocking JS: Sexual-risk behaviour, self-perceived risk and knowledge of sexually transmissible infections among young Australians attending a music festival. Sex Health 2007, 4(1):51-56.
  • [20]Lim MSC, Bowring A, Gold J, Hellard ME: What's your 'porn star' name? A novel method of identifying research participants (letter). Sex Transm Dis 2011, 38(2):150-151.
  • [21]National Health and Medical Research Council: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. NHMRC, Canberra; 2003.
  • [22]World Health Organization: Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000, 894(i-xii):1-253.
  • [23]Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000, 320(7244):1240.
  • [24]Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) Remoteness Areas (cat. no. 1216.0). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra; 2006.
  • [25]StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. In A College Station. StataCorp LP, TX; 2009.
  • [26]Brestoff J, Perry I, Van den Broeck J: Challenging the role of social norms regarding body weight as an explanation for weight, height, and BMI misreporting biases: Development and application of a new approach to examining misreporting and misclassification bias in surveys. BMC Publ Health 2011, 11(1):331. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [27]Australian Bureau of Statistics: How Australians Measure Up (cat. no. 4359.0). ABS, Canberra; 1999.
  • [28]Larson M: Social desirability and self-reported weight and height. Int J Obes 2000, 24(5):663-665.
  • [29]Ezzati M, Martin H, Skjold S, Hoorn SV, Murray CJL: Trends in national and state-level obesity in the USA after correction for self-report bias: analysis of health surveys. JRSM 2006, 99(5):250-257.
  • [30]De Vriendt T, Huybrechts I, Ottevaere C, Van Trimpont I, De Henauw S: Validity of Self-Reported Weight and Height of Adolescents, Its Impact on Classification into BMI-Categories and the Association with Weighing Behaviour. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009, 6(10):2696-2711.
  • [31]National Health and Medical Research Council: Overweight and obesity. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/grants/research-funding-statistics-and-data/overweight-and-obesity webcite
  • [32]Rhodes SD, Bowie DA, Hergenrather KC: Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57(1):68-73.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:64次 浏览次数:212次