Trade-offs drive resource specialization and the gradual establishment of ecotypes

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Christoph Adami²  Randall Lin¹  Bjørn Østman² 

[1] California Institute of Technology, CA 91125 Pasadena, USA;BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, 48824 East Lansing, USA

关键词: Phyletic evolution;    Simulation;    Adaptive radiation;    Selection;    Ecotypes;    Speciation;    Trade-offs;   

Others  :  855520
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-14-113

 received in 2014-03-22, accepted in 2014-05-19,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Speciation is driven by many different factors. Among those are trade-offs between different ways an organism utilizes resources, and these trade-offs can constrain the manner in which selection can optimize traits. Limited migration among allopatric populations and species interactions can also drive speciation, but here we ask if trade-offs alone are sufficient to drive speciation in the absence of other factors.

Results

We present a model to study the effects of trade-offs on specialization and adaptive radiation in asexual organisms based solely on competition for limiting resources, where trade-offs are stronger the greater an organism’s ability to utilize resources. In this model resources are perfectly substitutable, and fitness is derived from the consumption of these resources. The model contains no spatial parameters, and is therefore strictly sympatric. We quantify the degree of specialization by the number of ecotypes evolved and the niche breadth of the population, and observe that these are sensitive to resource influx and trade-offs. Resource influx has a strong effect on the degree of specialization, with a clear transition between minimal diversification at high influx and multiple species evolving at low resource influx. At low resource influx the degree of specialization further depends on the strength of the trade-offs, with more ecotypes evolving the stronger trade-offs are. The specialized organisms persist through negative frequency-dependent selection. In addition, by analyzing one of the evolutionary radiations in greater detail we demonstrate that a single mutation alone is not enough to establish a new ecotype, even though phylogenetic reconstruction identifies that mutation as the branching point. Instead, it takes a series of additional mutations to ensure the stable coexistence of the new ecotype in the background of the existing ones.

Conclusions

Trade-offs are sufficient to drive the evolution of specialization in sympatric asexual populations. Without trade-offs to restrain traits, generalists evolve and diversity decreases. The observation that several mutations are required to complete speciation, even when a single mutation creates the new species, highlights the gradual nature of speciation and the importance of phyletic evolution.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Østman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Agrawal AA, Conner JK, Rasmann S: Trade-offs and negative correlations in evolutionary ecology. In Evolution After Darwin: the First 150 Years. Edited by Levinton J, Futuyma D, Eanes W, Bell M. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2010:243-268.
• [2]Novak M, Pfeiffer T, Lenski RE, Sauer U, Bonhoeffer S: Experimental tests for an evolutionary trade-off between growth rate and yield in E. coli. Am Nat 2006, 168(2):242-251.
• [3]Edwards KF, Klausmeier CA, Litchman E: Evidence for a three-way trade-off between nitrogen and phosphorus competitive abilities and cell size in phytoplankton. Ecology 2011, 92(11):2085-2095.
• [4]Collins S: Competition limits adaptation and productivity in a photosynthetic alga at elevated CO2. Proc Biol Sci 2011, 278:247-255.
• [5]Frank SA: The trade-off between rate and yield in the design of microbial metabolism. J Evol Biol 2010, 23(3):609-613.
• [6]Gudelj I, Beardmore R, Arkin SS, MacLean RC: Constraints on microbial metabolism drive evolutionary diversification in homogeneous environments. J Evol Biol 2007, 20(5):1882-1889.
• [7]Monod J: The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu Rev Microbiol 1949, 3:371-394.
• [8]Kopp M, Hermisson J: Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness. 2008, J Evol Biol(21):1005-1023.
• [9]Gavrilets S, Waxman D: Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99(16):10533-10538.
• [10]Kondrashov AS, Kondrashov FA: Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 1999, 400:351-354.
• [11]MacLean RC, Dickson A, Bell G: Resource competition and adaptive radiation in a microbial microcosm. Ecol Lett 2005, 8:38-46.
• [12]Rainey PB, Travisano M: Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 1998, 394:69-72.
• [13]Hall AR, Colegrave N: How does resource supply affect evolutionary diversification? Proc Biol Sci 2007, 274:73-78.
• [14]Hutchinson G: The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 1961, 95:137-145.
• [15]Kolesov Y: The paradox of plankton is explained. Biofizika 1992, 37(6):1113-1114.
• [16]Horn J, Cattron J: The paradox of the plankton: Oscillations and chaos in multispecies evolution. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO 2003, Pt I, Proceedingsvol. 2723. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg; 2003, pp.298–309
• [17]Petersen R: Paradox of plankton - equilibrium hypothesis. Am Nat 1975, 109(965):35-49.
• [18]Roy S, Chattopadhyay J: Towards a resolution of ‘the paradox of the plankton’: a brief overview of the proposed mechanisms. Ecol Complex 2007, 4:26-33.
• [19]Schippers P, Verschoor A, Vos M, Mooij W: Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? Ecol Lett 2001, 4(5):404-407.
• [20]Shoresh N, Hegreness M, Kishony R: Evolution exacerbates the paradox of the plankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105(34):12365-12369.
• [21]Sommer U: The paradox of the plankton: fluctuations of phosphorous availability maintain diversity of phytoplankton in flow-through cultures. Limnol Oceanogr 1984, 29(3):633-636.
• [22]Van Valen L: Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 1976, 25:233-239.
• [23]Konstantinidis KT, Ramette A, Tiedje JM: The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2006, 361(1475):1929-1940.
• [24]Wilkins JS: The concept and causes of microbial species. Stud Hist Philos Life Sci 2007, 28(3):389-408.
• [25]Pennell MW, Harmon LJ, Uyeda JC: Is there room for punctuated equilibrium in macroevolution? Trends Ecol Evol 2014, 29(1):23-32.
• [26]Chow S, Wilke C, Ofria C, Lenski R, Adami C: Adaptive radiation from resource competition in digital organisms. Science 2004, 305:84-86.
• [27]Gillespie J: Population Genetics: A Concise Guide, Second Edition. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2004.
• [28]Tilman D: Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1982.
• [29]Ostrowski E, Ofria C, Lenski R: Ecological specialization and adaptive decay in digital organisms. Am Nat 2007, 169(1):1-20.
• [30]Rosenzweig ML: Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 1971, 171(3969):385-387.
• [31]Heilmann C, Schweitzer O, Gerke C, Vanittanakom N, Mack D, Götz F: Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol Microbiol 1996, 20(5):1083-1091.
• [32]Oakley TH, Østman B, Wilson ACV: Repression and loss of gene expression outpaces activation and gain in recently duplicated fly genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103(31):11637-11641.
• [33]Hottes AK, Freddolino PL, Khare A, Donnell ZN, Liu JC, Tavazoie S: Bacterial adaptation through loss of function. PLoS Genet 2013, 9(7):003617.
• [34]Boyer H, Englesberg E, Weinberg R: Direct selection of L-arabinose negative mutants ofEscherichia coli strain B/r. Genetics 1962, 47:417-425.
• [35]Bausch C, Peekhaus N, Utz C, Blais T, Murray E, Lowary T, Conway T: Sequence analysis of the GntII (Subsidiary) system for gluconate metabolism reveals a novel pathway for l-Idonic acid catabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1998, 180(14):3704-3710.
• [36]Boos W, Shuman H: Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1998, 61(1):204-229.
• [37]Kitano H: Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5(11):826-837.
• [38]Plucain J, Hindre T, Le Gac M, Tenaillon O, Cruveiller S, Medigue C, Leiby N, Harcombe WR, Marx CJ, Lenski RE, Schneider D: Epistasis and allele specificity in the emergence of a stable polymorphism in Escherichia coli. Science 2014, 343(6177):1366-1369.
• [39]Weissing FJ, Edelaar P, van Dorn GS: Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review. Behav Ecol Sociobiology 2011, 65(3):461.
• [40]de Aguiar MAM, Baranger M, Baptestini EM, Kaufman L, Bar-Yam Y: Global patterns of speciation and diversity. Nature 2009, 460(7253):384-387.
• [41]Østman B, Hintze A, Adami C: Impact of epistasis and pleiotropy on evolutionary adaptation. Proc Biol Sci 2012, 279:247-256.
• [42]Orr HA, Turelli M: The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 2001, 55(6):1085-1094.
• [43]Adami C, Hintze A: Evolutionary instability of zero-determinant strategies demonstrates that winning is not everything. Nat Commun 2013., 4(2193) http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/130801/ncomms3193/full/ncomms3193.html webcite.
• [44]Huisman J, Weissing F: Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 1999, 402:407-410.
• [45]Kacser H, Burns JA: The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 1981, 97(34):639-666.
• [46]Chou H-H, Chiu H-C, Delaney NF, Marx CJ, Segrè D: Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 2011, 332(6034):1190-1192.
• [47]Leiby N, Marx CJ: Metabolic erosion primarily through mutation accumulation, and not trade-offs, drives limited evolution of substrate specificity in escherichia coli. PLoS Biol 2014, 12(2):001789.
• [48]Skovran E, Crowther GJ, Guo X, Yang S, Lidstrom ME: A systems biology approach uncovers cellular strategies used by methylobacterium extorquens am1 during the switch from multi- to single-carbon growth. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(11):14091.
• [49]Blount ZD, Barrick JE, Davidson CJ, Lenski RE: Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature 2012, 489(7417):513-518.
• [50]Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, Venail P, Villeger S, Mouquet N: Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J Appl Ecol 2010, 47(1):15-25.
• [51]Østman B, Lin R, Adami C: Data from: Trade-offs drive resource specialization and the gradual establishment of ecotypes. Dryad Digit Repositorydoi:10.5061/dryad.6n660. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6n660 webcite