期刊论文详细信息
BMC Psychiatry
Internet-based individually versus group guided self-help treatment for social anxiety disorder: protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Thomas Berger1  Timo Stolz1  Ava Schulz1 
[1] Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
关键词: Group guided self-help;    Guided self-help;    Self-help;    Internet-based treatment;    Randomized controlled trial (RCT);    Social phobia;    SAD;    Social anxiety disorder;   
Others  :  1123635
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-14-115
 received in 2014-04-08, accepted in 2014-04-11,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most common mental disorders and causes subjective suffering and economic burden worldwide. Although effective treatments are available, a lot of cases go untreated. Internet-based self-help is a low-threshold and flexible treatment alternative for SAD. Various studies have already shown that internet-based self-help can be effective to reduce social phobic symptoms significantly. Most of the interventions tested include therapist support, whereas the role of peer support within internet-based self-help has not yet been fully understood. There is evidence suggesting that patients’ mutual exchange via integrated discussion forums can increase the efficacy of internet-based treatments. This study aims at investigating the added value of therapist-guided group support on the treatment outcome of internet-based self-help for SAD.

Methods/design

The study is conducted as a randomized controlled trial. A total of 150 adults with a diagnosis of SAD are randomly assigned to either a waiting-list control group or one of the active conditions. The participants in the two active conditions use the same internet-based self-help program, either with individual support by a psychologist or therapist-guided group support. In the group guided condition, participants can communicate with each other via an integrated, protected discussion forum. Subjects are recruited via topic related websites and links; diagnostic status will be assessed with a telephone interview. The primary outcome variables are symptoms of SAD and diagnostic status after the intervention. Secondary endpoints are general symptomology, depression, quality of life, as well as the primary outcome variables 6 months later. Furthermore, process variables such as group processes, the change in symptoms and working alliance will be studied.

Discussion

The results of this study should indicate whether group-guided support could enhance the efficacy of an internet-based self-help treatment for SAD. This novel treatment format, if shown effective, could represent a cost-effective option and could further be modified to treat other conditions, as well.

Trial registration

ISRCTN75894275

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Schulz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150216040947290.pdf 220KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Kessler RC: The impairments caused by social phobia in the general population: implications for intervention. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003, 108:19-27.
  • [2]Stangier U, Heidenreich T, Peitz M: Soziale Phobien. Ein kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutisches Behandlungsmanual. Weinheim: Beltz; 2003.
  • [3]Magee WJ, Eaton WW, Wittchen H-U, McGonagle KA, Kessler RC: Agoraphobia, simple phobia, and social phobia in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996, 53:159-168.
  • [4]Chartier MJ, Hazen AL, Stein MB: Lifetime patterns of social phobia: a retrospective study of the course of social phobia in a nonclinical population. Depress Anxiety 1998, 7:113-121.
  • [5]Acarturk C, Cuijpers P, van Straten A, de Graaf R: Psychological treatment of social anxiety disorder: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2009, 39:241-254.
  • [6]Wang PS, Berglund P, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC: Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005, 62:603-613.
  • [7]King SA, Poulos ST: Using the internet to treat generalized social phobia and avoidant personality disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998, 1(1):29-36.
  • [8]Andersson G, Cuijpers P: Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther 2009, 38(4):196-205.
  • [9]Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N: Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2010, 5(10):e13196. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013196
  • [10]Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, Shapira N: A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effettiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. JTechnol Hum Serv 2008, 26(2/4):109-160.
  • [11]Cuijpers P, Straten AM, Andersson G: Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review. J Behav Med 2008, 31:169-177.
  • [12]Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklicek I, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V: Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2007, 37:319-328.
  • [13]Andersson G: Using the internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy. Behav Res Ther 2009, 47:175-180.
  • [14]Palmqvist B, Carlbring P, Andersson G: Internet-delivered treatments with or without therapist input: does the therapist factor have implications for efficacy and cost? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2007, 7:291-297.
  • [15]Berger T, Caspar F, Richardson R, Kneubühler B, Sutter D, Andersson G: Internet-based treatment of social phobia: a randomized controlled trial comparing unguided with two types of guided self-help. Behav Res Ther 2011, 49:158-169.
  • [16]Titov N, Andrews G, Choi I, Schwencke G, Johnston L: Randomized controlled trial of web-based treatment of social phobia without clinician guidance. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009, 43:913-919.
  • [17]Boettcher J, Carlbring P, Renneberg B, Berger T: Internet-based interventions for social anxiety disorder - an overview. Verhaltenstherapie 2013, 23:160-168.
  • [18]Titov N, Andrews G, Schwencke G, Solley K, Johnston L, Robinson E: An RCT comparing effect of two types of support on severity of symptoms for people completing internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for social phobia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009, 43(10):920-926.
  • [19]Furmark T, Carlbring P, Hedman E, Sonnenstein A, Clevberger P, Bohman B, Eriksson A, Hallen A, Frykman M, Holmström A, Sparthan E, Tillfors M, Nilsson-Ihrfelt E, Spak M, Eriksson A, Ekselius L, Andersson G: Guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2009, 195:440-447.
  • [20]Titov N, Andrews G, Choi I, Schwencke G, Mahoney A: Shyness 3: An RCT of guided versus unguided Internet based CBT for social phobia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008, 42(12):1030-1040.
  • [21]Andersson G, Carlbring P, Furmark T: Therapist experience and knowledge acquisition in internet-delivered cbt for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2012, 7(5):1-10.
  • [22]Berger T, Caspar F: Von anderen Patienten lernen: Konsequenzen neuer Entwicklungen im Internet für webbasierte, psychotherapeutische Angebote. Psychotherapeut 2008, 53:130-137.
  • [23]Berger T, Hohl E, Caspar F: Internet-based treatment for social phobia: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychol 2009, 65(10):1021-1035.
  • [24]Berger T: Web 2.0 - Soziale Netzwerke und Psychotherapie. Psychotherapie im Dialog 2011, 12(2):118-122.
  • [25]Stangier U, Heidenreich T, Peitz M, Lauterbach W, Clark DM: Cognitive therapy for social phobia: individual versus group treatment. Behav Res Ther 2003, 41:991-1007.
  • [26]Boettcher J, Berger T, Renneberg B: Does a pre-treatment diagnostic interview affect the outcome of internet-based self-help for social anxiety disorder? a randomized controlled trial. Behav Cogn Psychother 2012, 40(5):513-528.
  • [27]Berger T, Hohl E, Caspar F: Internetbasierte Therapie der sozialen Phobie: Ergebnisse einer 6-Monate-Katamnese. Z Klin Psychol Psychother 2010, 39(4):217-221.
  • [28]Clarke DM, Wells A: A cognitive model of social phobia. New York: Guilford Press; 1995.
  • [29]Berger T, Boettcher J, Caspar F: Internet-based guided self-help for several anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial comparing a tailored with a standardized disorder-specific approach. 2013.
  • [30]Stangier U, Heidenreich T, Berardi A, Golbs U, Hoyer J: Die Erfassung sozialer Phobie durch die Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) und die Social Phobia Scale (SPS). Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother 1999, 28:28-36.
  • [31]Horvath AO, Greenberg LS: Development and validation ot the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol 1989, 36:223-233.
  • [32]Bormann B, Burlingame G, Strauß B: The German Group Questionnaire: A multi-site validation study. Annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research: 2009 2009.
  • [33]Mattick RP, Clarke C: Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behav Res Ther 1998, 36:455-470.
  • [34]Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T: Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1997.
  • [35]Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C: BDI-II Beck Depressions-Inventar. Frankfurt am Main: Harcourt Test Services; 2006.
  • [36]Franke GH: BSI, Brief Symptom Inventory von L. R. Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R) - deutsches Manual. Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH; 2000.
  • [37]Schlarb AA, Hautzinger M: Klinisch-psychiatrische Ratingskalen für das Kindes- und Jugendalter. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2011.
  • [38]Horowitz LM, Strauß B, Kordy H: Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme (IIP-D). Weinheim: Beltz; 2000.
  • [39]Gurtman MB: Interpersonal problems and the psychotherapy context: the construct validity of the inventroy of interpersonal problems. Psychol Assess 1996, 8(3):241-255.
  • [40]Horowitz LM, Rosenberg SE, Baer BA, Ureno G, Villasenor VS: Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988, 56(6):885-892.
  • [41]Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Frazier JE, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M: Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the sf-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the iqola project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51(11):1171-1178.
  • [42]Jürgen S, Lamprecht F, Wittmann WW: Zufriedenheit mit der stationären Versorung. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens und erste Validitätsuntersuchungen. Psychother med Psychol 1989, 39:248-255.
  • [43]Attkisson CC, Zwick R: The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982, 5:233-237.
  • [44]Bormann B, Burlingame GM, Strauß B: Der Gruppenfragebogen (GQ-D). Instrument zur Messung von therapeutischen Beziehungen in der Gruppenpsychotherapie. Psychotherapeut 2011, 56:297-309.
  • [45]Titov N, Andrews G, Kemp A, Robinson E: Characteristics of adults with anxiety or depression treated at an internet clinic: comparison with a national survey and an outpatient clinic. PLoS One 2010, 5(5):1-5.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:23次