期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
The role of action planning and plan enactment for smoking cessation
Catherine Bolman1  Sander M Eggers2  Hein de Vries2 
[1] Faculty of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, PO Box 2960, Heerlen 6401 DL, The Netherlands;Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
关键词: Planned quit attempts;    Plan enactment;    Preparatory planning;    Action planning;    Smoking cessation;   
Others  :  1162288
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-393
 received in 2012-03-19, accepted in 2013-04-12,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Several studies have reemphasized the role of action planning. Yet, little attention has been paid to the role of plan enactment. This study assesses the determinants and the effects of action planning and plan enactment on smoking cessation.

Methods

One thousand and five participants completed questionnaires at baseline and at follow-ups after one and six months. Factors queried were part of the I-Change model. Descriptive analyses were used to assess which plans were enacted the most. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to assess whether the intention to quit smoking predicted action planning and plan enactment, and to assess which factors would predict quitting behavior. Subsequently, both multivariate and univariate regression analyses were used to assess which particular action plans would be most effective in predicting quitting behavior. Similar analyses were performed among a subsample of smokers prepared to quit within one month.

Results

Smokers who intended to quit smoking within the next month had higher levels of action planning than those intending to quit within a year. Additional predictors of action planning were being older, being female, having relatively low levels of cigarette dependence, perceiving more positive and negative consequences of quitting, and having high self-efficacy toward quitting. Plan enactment was predicted by baseline intention to quit and levels of action planning. Regression analysis revealed that smoking cessation after six months was predicted by low levels of depression, having a non-smoking partner, the intention to quit within the next month, and plan enactment. Only 29% of the smokers who executed relatively few plans had quit smoking versus 59% of the smokers who executed many plans. The most effective preparatory plans for smoking cessation were removing all tobacco products from the house and choosing a specific date to quit.

Conclusion

Making preparatory plans to quit smoking is important because it also predicts plan enactment, which is predictive of smoking cessation. Not all action plans were found to be predictive of smoking cessation. The effects of planning were not very much different between the total sample and smokers prepared to quit within one month.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 de Vries et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413061417862.pdf 220KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]West R, McNeill A, Raw M: Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an update. Health Education Authority. Thorax 2000, 55(12):987-999.
  • [2]Godin G, Conner M: Intention-behavior relationship based on epidemiologic indices: an application to physical activity. Am J Heal Promot 2008, 22(3):180-182.
  • [3]Orbell S, Sheeran P: ‘Inclined abstainers’: a problem for predicting health-related behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol 1998, 37(Pt 2):151-165.
  • [4]Bagozzi RP, Baumgartner H, Yi Y: State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: an application to coupon usage. J Consum Res 1992, 18:505-518. march 1992
  • [5]Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol 1999, 54(7):493-503.
  • [6]Heckhausen J, Baltes PB: Perceived controllability of expected psychological change across adulthood and Old Age. J Gerontol 1991, 46(4):P165-P173. July 1, 1991
  • [7]Schwarzer R (Ed): Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992.
  • [8]de Vries H, Mudde A, Leijs I, Charlton A, Vartiainen E, Buijs G, Clemente MP, Storm H, Gonzalez Navarro A, Nebot M, Prins T, Kremers S: The European smoking prevention framework approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention. Health Education Research; Theory and Practice 2003, 18(5):611-626.
  • [9]Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ: Illness representations and coping with health threats. In Handbook of Psychology and Health. Edited by Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1984:219-252.
  • [10]Leventhal H, Singer R, Jones S: Effects of fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. J Personal Soc Psychol 1965, 2(1):20-29.
  • [11]Leventhal H, Watts JC, Pagano F: Effects of fear and instructions on how to cope with danger. J Personal Soc Psychol 1967, 6(3):313-321.
  • [12]Abraham C, Sheeran P: Implications of goal theories for the theoies of reasoned action and planned behavior. Current Psychology: developmental, learning, personality, social 2003, 22(3):264-280.
  • [13]Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R: Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Heal 2005, 20(2):143-160.
  • [14]Sniehotta FF: Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: Plans, planning, and self-regulation. Br J Heal Psychol 2009, 14(2):261-273.
  • [15]Bergeson SC, Dean JD: A systems approach to patient-centered care. JAMA 2006, 296(23):2848-2851. December 20, 2006
  • [16]van Osch L, Lechner L, Reubsaet A, Wigger S, De Vries H: Relapse prevention in a national smoking cessation contest: Effects of coping planning. Br J Heal Psychol 2008, 13(3):525-535.
  • [17]Van Osch L, Lechner L, Reubsaet A, De Vries H: From theory to practice: An explorative study into the instrumentality and specificity of implementation intentions. Psychol Heal 2010, 25(3):351-364.
  • [18]Handley M, MacGregor K, Schillinger D, Sharifi C, Wong S, Bodenheimer T, et al.: Using action plans to help primary care patients adopt healthy behaviors: a descriptive study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006, 19(3):224-231. May 1, 2006
  • [19]MacGregor K, Handley M, Wong S, Sharifi C, Gjeltema K, Schillinger D: Behavior-change action plans in primary care: a feasibility study of clinicians. J Am Board Fam Med 2006, 19(3):215-223. May 1, 2006
  • [20]Austin JT, Vancouver JB: Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process and content. Psychol Bull 1996, 120(3):338-375.
  • [21]De Vries H, Dijk F, Wetzels J, Mudde A, Kremers S, Ariza C, et al.: The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): effects after 24 and 30 months. Heal Educ Res 2006, 21(1):116-132.
  • [22]De Vries H, Kremers S, Smeets T, Eijmael K: The effectiveness of tailored feedback and action plans in an intervention addressing multiple health behaviors. Am J Heal Promot 2008, 22(6):417-425.
  • [23]Abraham C, Sheeran P, Orbell S: Can social cognitive models contribute to the effectiveness of HIV-preventive behavioural interventions? A brief review of the literature and a reply to Joffe (1996; 1997) and Fife-Schaw (1997). Br J Med Psychol 1998, 71(Pt 3):297-310.
  • [24]Sheeran P, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM: The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31(1):87-98.
  • [25]Bandura A: Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol 1989, 44(9):1175-1184.
  • [26]Latham GP, Locke EA: Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting. Organ Dyn 2006, 35(4):332-340.
  • [27]Stock J, Cervone D: Proximal goal-setting and self-regulatory processes. Cogn Ther Res 1990, 14(5):483-498.
  • [28]Locke EA, Latham GP: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am Psychol 2002, 57(9):705-717.
  • [29]Bagozzi RP, Edwards EA: Goal setting and goal pursuit in the regulation of body weight. Psychol Heal 1998, 13(4):593-621.
  • [30]Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983, 51(3):390-395.
  • [31]Bartholomew LK, Mullen PD: Five roles for using theory and evidence in the design and testing of behavior change interventions. J Public Health Dent 2011, 71:S20-S33.
  • [32]Bryan A, Fisher J, Fisher W: Tests of the mediational role of preparatory safer sexual behavior in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Heal Psychol 2002, 21(1):71-80.
  • [33]Goebbels AF, Nicholson JM, Walsch K, de Vries H: Teachers’ reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect: behaviour and determinants. Heal Educ Res 2008, 23(6):941-951.
  • [34]de Vet E, Gebhardt WA, Sinnige J, Van Puffelen A, Van Lettow B, de Wit JBF: Implementation intentions for buying, carrying, discussing and using condoms: the role of the quality of plans. Heal Educ Res 2011, 26(3):443-455.
  • [35]Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R: Stage-specific adoption and maintenance of physical activity: testing a three-stage model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2005, 6(5):585-603.
  • [36]Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P: Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Effects and Processes. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Edited by Zanna MP. San Diego: Academic Press; 2006:69-119.
  • [37]Jackson C, Lawton R, Knapp P, Raynor DK, Conner M, Lowe C, et al.: Beyond intention: do specific plans increase health behaviours in patients in primary care? A study of fruit and vegetable consumption. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60(10):2383-2391.
  • [38]Rutter D, Steadman L, Quine L: An implementation intentions intervention to increase uptake of mammography. Ann Behav Med 2006, 32(2):127-134.
  • [39]Skår S, Sniehotta FF, Molloy GJ, Prestwich A, Araújo-Soares V: Do brief online planning interventions increase physical activity amongst university students? A randomised controlled trial. Psychol Heal 2008, 26(4):399-417.
  • [40]Webb TL, Sheeran P: Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: the role of goal intentions, self‒efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. Br J Soc Psychol 2008, 47(3):373.
  • [41]Hoving C, Mudde AN, de Vries H: Intention to adopt a smoking cessation expert system within a self-selected sample of Dutch general practitioners. Eur J Cancer Prev 2006, 15(1):82-86.
  • [42]Hilberink S, Jacobs J, Schlosser M, Grol R, De Vries H: Characteristics of patients with COPD in three motivational stages related to smoking cessation. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 61:449-457.
  • [43]Tindle HA, Shiffman S, Hartman AM, Bost JE: Switching to “lighter” cigarettes and quitting smoking. Tob Control 2009, 18(6):485-490.
  • [44]Scholz U, Nagy G, Göhner W, Luszczynska A, Kliegel M: Changes in self-regulatory cognitions as predictors of changes in smoking and nutrition behaviour. Psychol Heal 2009, 24:545-561.
  • [45]Dholakia U, Bagozzi R, Gopinath M: How formulating implementation plans and remembering past actions facilitate the enactment of effortful decisions. J Behav Decis Mak 2007, 20(4):343-364.
  • [46]Te Poel F, Bolman C, Reubsaet A, de Vries H: Efficacy of a single computer-tailored e-mail for smoking cessation: results after 6 months. Heal Educ Res 2009, 24(6):930-940. December 1, 2009
  • [47]Dijkstra A, Bakker M, de Vries H: Subtypes within a sample of precontemplating smokers: a preliminary extension of the stages of change. Addict Behav 1997, 22(3):327-337.
  • [48]Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom K-O: The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991, 86(9):1119-1127.
  • [49]Comstock GW, Helsing KJ: Symptoms of depression in two communities. Psychol Med 1977, 6(04):551-563.
  • [50]Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J: Targeting smokers with Low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials. Prev Med 1999, 28(2):203-211.
  • [51]MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V: A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 2002, 7(1):83-104.
  • [52]Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS: Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd edition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
  • [53]MacKinnon DP, Luecken LJ: How and for whom? Mediation and moderation in health psychology. Heal Psychol 2008, 27(2 Suppl):S99-S100.
  • [54]Mackinnon DP, Warsi G, Dwyer JH: A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivar Behav Res 1995, 30(1):41.
  • [55]De Vries H, Mesters I, Riet J, Willems K, Reubsaet A: Motives of belgian adolescents for using sunscreen: the role of action plans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15(7):1360-1366. July 1, 2006
  • [56]Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R: Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: a longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Psychol Heal 2003, 18(1):93-108.
  • [57]Orbell S, Sheeran P: Motivational and volitional processes in action initiation: a field study of the role of implementation intentions. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000, 30(4):780-797.
  • [58]Sheeran P, Milne S, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions and health behaviour. In Predicting health behaviour. Edited by Conner M, Norman P. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2005:276-323.
  • [59]Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R: Action plans and coping plans for physical exercise: a longitudinal intervention study in cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Heal Psychol 2006, 11(Pt 1):23-37.
  • [60]Balmford J, Borland R, Burney S: The influence of having a quit date on prediction of smoking cessation outcome. Heal Educ Res 2010, 25(4):698-706.
  • [61]Dijkstra A: Disengagement beliefs in smokers: do they influence the effects of a tailored persuasive message advocating smoking cessation? Psychol Heal 2009, 24(7):791-804.
  • [62]Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J: Computerized tailored feedback to change cognitive determinants of smoking: a Dutch field experiment. Heal Educ Res 1998, 13(2):197-206.
  • [63]Gwaltney CJ, Metrik J, Kahler CW, Shiffman S: Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Addict Behav 2009, 23(1):56-66.
  • [64]Haug S, Meyer C, Ulbricht S, Schorr G, Ruge J, Rumpf HJ, et al.: Predictors and moderators of outcome in different brief interventions for smoking cessation in general medical practice. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 78(1):57-64.
  • [65]Elfeddali I, Bolman C, Candel MJ, Wiers RW, De Vries H: The role of self-efficacy, recovery self-efficacy, and preparatory planning in predicting short-term smoking relapse. Br J Heal Psychol 2012, 17(1):185-201.
  • [66]West R: The multiple facets of cigarette addiction and what they mean for encouraging and helping smokers to stop. COPD 2009, 6(4):277-283.
  • [67]Smit ES, Fidler JA, West R: The role of desire, duty and intention in predicting attempts to quit smoking. Addiction 2011, 106(4):844-851.
  • [68]Verplanken B: Beyond frequency: habit as mental construct. Br J Soc Psychol 2006, 45:639-656.
  • [69]O’Connell KA, Hosein VL, Schwartz JE, Leibowitz RQ: How does coping help people resist lapses during smoking cessation? Heal Psychol 2007, 26(1):77-84.
  • [70]Michie S, Churchill S, West R: Identifying evidence-based competences required to deliver behavioural support for smoking cessation. Ann Behav Med 2011, 41(1):59-70.
  • [71]Mudde AN, de Vries H: The reach and effectiveness of a national mass media-led smoking cessation campaign in The Netherlands. Am J Public Health 1999, 89(3):346-350.
  • [72]Bolman C, de Vries H, van Breukelen G: Evaluation of a nurse-managed minimal contact smoking cessation intervention for cardiac patients. Heal Educ Res 2002, 17:99-116.
  • [73]Dijkstra A, Conijn B, de Vries H: A match-mismatch test of a stage model of behavior change in tobacco smoking. Addiction 2006, 101:1035-1043.
  • [74]Zhou X, Nonnemaker J, Sherrill B, Gilsenan AW, Coste F, West R: Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addict Behav 2009, 34(4):365-373.
  • [75]Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
  • [76]Dholakia U, Bagozzi R: Mustering motivation to enact decisions: how decision process characteristics influence goal realization. J Behav Decis Mak 2002, 15(3):167-188.
  • [77]Larabie L: To what extent do smokers plan quit attempts? Tob Control 2005, 14(6):425-428.
  • [78]Murray RL, Lewis SA, Coleman T, Britton J, McNeill A: Unplanned attempts to quit smoking: missed opportunities for health promotion? Addiction 2009, 140(11):1901-1909.
  • [79]Ferguson SG, Shiffman S, Gitchell JG, Sembower MA, West R: Unplanned Quit Attempts – Results from a US sample of smokers and ex-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2009, 11(7):827-832.
  • [80]Cooper J, Borland R, Yong H-H, McNeill A, Murray RL, O’Connor RJ, Cummings KM: To what extent do smokers make spontaneous quit attempts and what are the implications of smoking cessation maintenance? Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four country survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2010, 12(1):S51-S57.
  • [81]Prochaska JO: What do we know about unplanned quit attempts? Practically nothing or nothing practical? Addiction 2011, 106(11):2014-2015.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:1次