The effects of an intervention program for promoting interorganizational network building between multidisciplinary agencies and community-based organizations: a cluster trial in Japan

BMC Public Health

Sachiyo Murashima³  Satoko Nagata³  Takuhiro Yamaguchi¹  Hiroshi Murayama² 

[1] Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan;Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan;Department of Community Health Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

关键词: Intervention program;    Community-based organization;    Multidisciplinary agency;    Interorganizational network;   

Others  :  1163797
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-178

 received in 2011-09-21, accepted in 2012-03-12,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Strengthening interorganizational relationships in the community has become an increasingly valued strategy for improving public health in recent years. However, no intervention strategy to foster an interorganizational network in the community has yet been devised. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on members of an organization of an intervention program designed to promote interorganizational network building between multidisciplinary agencies and community-based organizations (CBOs).

Methods

The program was conducted in Setagaya and Suginami wards, Tokyo, Japan, for staff of community comprehensive support centers (CCSCs), which are multidisciplinary organizations responsible for the support of the elderly. A cluster non-randomized design with a CCSC as a cluster unit (N = 47) was used. The intervention group comprised 20 centers and the control group 27 centers. Those 27 centers declined to participate in program sessions, but did participate through completing pre- and post-intervention surveys. In total, 158 staff members were eligible to participate in this study, 73 from the intervention group and 85 from the control group. Of the 73 members in the intervention group, 19 participated in the monthly program sessions, over a period of 10 months. Attendees participated in group discussions during the sessions. The effects of the intervention were examined by comparing three groups (attendees and non-attendees of the program from the intervention group, and the control group) and between two groups (intervention group and control group).

Results

We found no significant difference in any outcome between the intervention group and the control group. However, among the three groups, a significant effect was found in the recognition of knowledge and skills for building networks with CBOs. Recognition of knowledge and skills increased significantly among the attendees compared to non-attendees in the intervention group and the control group. In addition, there was a significant effect, particularly on those with relatively low baseline scores, for the recognition of knowledge and skills.

Conclusions

The tested intervention proved effective for attendees regarding their recognition of knowledge and skills for promoting interorganizational network building with CBOs.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Murayama et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Provan KG, Milward HB: A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Admin Sci Quart 1995, 40:1-33.
• [2]Luke DA, Harris JK: Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu Rev Public Health 2007, 28:69-93.
• [3]Alter C, Hage J: Organizations working together. California: Sage Publications; 1993.
• [4]Butterfoss F, Goodman R, Wandersman A: Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Res 1993, 8:315-330.
• [5]Penner S: A study of coalitions among HIV/AIDS service organizations. Sociol Perspect 1995, 38:217-239.
• [6]Chaskin RJ, Brown P, Venkatesh S, Vidal A: Building community capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 2001.
• [7]Provan KG, Milward HB: Do networks really work? a framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Admin Rev 2001, 61:414-423.
• [8]Foster-Fishman PG, Salem DA, Allen NA, Fahrbach K: Facilitating interorganizational collaboration: the contributions of interorganizational alliances. Am J Community Psychol 2001, 29:875-905.
• [9]Kramer JS, Philliber S, Brindis CD, Kamin SL, Chadwick AE, Revels ML, Chervin DD, Driscoll A, Bartelli D, Wike RS, Peterson SA, Schmidt CK, Valderrama LT: Coalition models: lessons learned from the CDC's Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the prevention of teen pregnancy. J Adolesc Health 2005, 37(Suppl 1):S20-S30.
• [10]Murayama H, Narabu H, Kojima T, Tomaru M, Tachibana R, Yamaguchi T, Murashima S: Program development to promote network building between disciplinary agency and informal community organization. Jpn J Public Health 2010, 57:900-908. [Japanese with English abstract]
• [11]Bandura A: Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1986.
• [12]Bandura A: Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1997.
• [13]Bandura A: Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2001, 52:1-26.
• [14]National Institute of Population and Social Security Research: Nihon no shikuchoson betsu shorai suike jinko: 2005-2035 [Population projections by municipality, Japan: 2005- 2035]. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2009. [Japanese]
• [15]Florin P, Mitchell R, Stevenson J: Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res 1993, 8:417-432.
• [16]Murayama H, Kojima T, Tomaru M, Narabu H, Tachibana R, Yamaguchi T, Murashima S: Program evaluation to promote network building between disciplinary agency and informal community organization: trial in community comprehensive support center. Jpn J Public Health 2010, 57:909-921. [Japanese with English abstract]
• [17]Frans DJ: A scale for measuring social worker empowerment. Res Soc Work Pract 1993, 3:312-328.
• [18]Bolland JM, Wilson JV: Three faces of integrative coordination: a model of interorganizational relations in community-based health and human services. Health Serv Res 1994, 29:341-366.
• [19]Krauss M, Mueller N, Luke D: Interorganizational relationships within state tobacco control networks: a social network analysis. Prev Chronic Dis 2004, 1:A08.
• [20]Feinberg ME, Riggs NR, Greenberg MT: Social networks and community prevention coalitions. J Prim Prev 2005, 26:279-298.
• [21]Murray DM: Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
• [22]Kelger MC, Rigler J, Honeycutt S: How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? a multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:90. BioMed Central Full Text