Formative research to develop a community-based intervention for chronic disease prevention in Guatemalan school-age children

BMC Public Health

Joel Gittelsohn¹  Benjamin Caballero¹  Manuel Ramirez-Zea²  Paola Letona² 

[1]Department of International Health, Center for Human Nutrition, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

[2]INCAP Comprehensive Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Guatemala City 1118, Guatemala

关键词: Developing countries;    Chronic disease prevention;    Behavioral risk factors;    Community-based intervention;    Formative research;   

Others  :  1161283
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-101

 received in 2013-04-30, accepted in 2014-01-27,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Noncommunicable diseases (NCD) are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, even in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Recent trends in health promotion emphasize community-based interventions as an important strategy for improving health outcomes. The aim of this study was to conduct formative research regarding the perceptions of NCD risk factors, their influencing factors, and community resources available to aid the development and implementation of a community-based intervention with school-age children.

Methods

Focus group discussions (n = 18), home visits (n = 30), and individual semi-structured interviews (n = 26) were conducted in three urban communities in Guatemala with school-age children (10–12 years of age), teachers, parents, and local community members (i.e., school principals, school food kiosk vendors, religious leaders, authority representatives). All focus groups and interviews were transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis.

Results

Children, parents, and teachers have general knowledge about modifiable risk factors. Adults worried more about tobacco use, as compared to unhealthy diet and physical inactivity in children. Participants identified features at the intrapersonal (e.g., negative emotional state), interpersonal (e.g., peers as role models), and organizational and community levels (e.g., high levels of crime) that influence these risk factors in children. School committees, religious leaders, and government programs and activities were among the positive community resources identified.

Conclusions

These findings should help researchers in Guatemala and similar LMIC to develop community-based interventions for NCD prevention in school-age children that are effective, feasible, and culturally acceptable.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Letona et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Alwan A, Maclean DR, Riley LM, d'Espaignet ET, Mathers CD, Stevens GA, Bettcher D: Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: progress and capacity in high-burden countries. Lancet 2010, 376(9755):1861-1868.
• [2]WHO: Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
• [3]WHO: Global health risks. Mortality Burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.
• [4]Bandura A: Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004, 31(2):143-164.
• [5]Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, Stone EJ, Rajab MW, Corso P: The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22(4 Suppl):73-107.
• [6]Ciliska D, Miles E, O´Brien MA, Turl C, Tomasik HH, Donovan U, Beyers J: Effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. J Nutr Educ 2000, 32(6):341-352.
• [7]Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K, McKee M: Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med 2006, 42(2):85-95.
• [8]Carson KV, Brinn MP, Labiszewski NA, Esterman AJ, Chang AB, Smith BJ: Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane database of Syst Rev 2011., 7CD001291
• [9]Shakeshaft A, Petrie D, Doran C, Breen C, Sanson-Fisher R: An empirical approach to selecting community-based alcohol interventions: combining research evidence, rural community views and professional opinion. BMC public health 2012, 12:25. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Merzel C, D'Afflitti J: Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. Am J Publ Health 2003, 93(4):557-574.
• [11]Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson CC, Pratt C, Grieser M, Pickrel J, Stone EJ, Conway T, Coombs D, Staten LK: Formative research in school and community-based health programs and studies: "state of the art" and the TAAG approach. Health Educ Behav 2006, 33(1):25-39.
• [12]WHO: Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2011. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
• [13]Montenegro-Bethancourt G, Doak CM, Solomons N: Fruit and vegetable intake of schoolchildren in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2009, 25(2):146-156.
• [14]WHO: Fruit and vegetable promotion initiative. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
• [15]Tong VT, Turcios-Ruiz RM, Dietz PM, England LJ: Patterns and predictors of current cigarette smoking in women and men of reproductive age-Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2011, 30(3):240-247.
• [16]Mbowe O, Diaz A, Wallace J, Mazariegos M, Jolly P: Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Guatemalan School Children. Matern Child Health J 2013. Epub ahead of print
• [17]McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988, 15(4):351-377.
• [18]Bermudez OI, Toher C, Montenegro-Bethancourt G, Vossenaar M, Mathias P, Doak C, Solomons NW: Dietary intakes and food sources of fat and fatty acids in Guatemalan schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study. Nutr J 2010, 9:20. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Ringmayr T: ATLAS.ti. 62nd edition. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2011.
• [20]Monge-Rojas R, Garita C, Sanchez M, Munoz L: Barriers to and motivators for healthful eating as perceived by rural and urban Costa Rican adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav 2005, 37(1):33-40.
• [21]Lautenschlager L, Smith C: Beliefs, knowledge, and values held by inner-city youth about gardening, nutrition, and cooking. Agr Hum Val 2007, 24(2):245-258.
• [22]Goh YY, Bogart LM, Sipple-Asher BK, Uyeda K, Hawes-Dawson J, Olarita-Dhungana J, Ryan GW, Schuster MA: Using community-based participatory research to identify potential interventions to overcome barriers to adolescents' healthy eating and physical activity. J Behav Med 2009, 32(5):491-502.
• [23]Rawlins E, Baker G, Maynard M, Harding S: Perceptions of healthy eating and physical activity in an ethnically diverse sample of young children and their parents: the DEAL prevention of obesity study. J Hum Nutr Diet 2013, 26(2):132-144.
• [24]Gaskin PS, Lai P, Guy D, Knight J, Jackson M, Nielsen AL: Diet, physical activity, weight status, and culture in a sample of children from the developing world. J Nutr metabol 2012, 2012:242875.
• [25]Cullen KW, Baranowski T, Rittenberry L, Olvera N: Social-environmental influences on children's diets: results from focus groups with African-, Euro- and Mexican-American children and their parents. Health Educ Res 2000, 15(5):581-590.
• [26]Katims DS, Zapata JT, Yin Z: Risk factors for substance use by Mexican American youth with and without learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1996, 29(2):213-219.
• [27]Kinsman SB, Romer D, Furstenberg FF, Schwarz DF: Early sexual initiation: the role of peer norms. Pediatrics 1998, 102(5):1185-1192.
• [28]Latkin CA, Forman V, Knowlton A, Sherman S: Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56(3):465-476.
• [29]Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Tortu S, Botvin EM: Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: results of a 3-year study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990, 58(4):437-446.
• [30]Mellanby AR, Rees JB, Tripp JH: Peer-led and adult-led school health education: a critical review of available comparative research. Health Educ Res 2000, 15(5):533-545.
• [31]Valente TW, Hoffman BR, Ritt-Olson A, Lichtman K, Johnson CA: Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Am J of Public health 2003, 93(11):1837-1843.
• [32]Gittelsohn J, Kumar MB: Preventing childhood obesity and diabetes: is it time to move out of the school? Pediatr Diab 2007, 8(Suppl 9):55-69.
• [33]Ellison CG, Levin JS: The religion-health connection: evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 1998, 25(6):700-720.
• [34]DeHaven MJ, Hunter IB, Wilder L, Walton JW, Berry J: Health programs in faith-based organizations: are they effective? Am J public health 2004, 94(6):1030-1036.
• [35]Asomugha CN, Derose KP, Lurie N: Faith-based organizations, science, and the pursuit of health. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2011, 22(1):50-55.
• [36]Schell SF, Luke DA, Schooley MW, Elliott MB, Herbers SH, Mueller NB, Bunger AC: Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework. Implementation Sci 2013, 8:15. BioMed Central Full Text