期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
What happens to coroners’ recommendations for improving public health and safety? Organisational responses under a mandatory response regime in Victoria, Australia
David M Studdert2  Jane Pirkis3  Graham Sewell1  Lyndal Bugeja4  Celia Kemp3  Georgina Sutherland3 
[1] Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia;Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, USA;Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia;Coroners Court of Victoria, 222 Exhibition St, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
关键词: Survey;    Organisations;    Public health;    Recommendations;    Coroner;   
Others  :  1128988
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-732
 received in 2013-10-16, accepted in 2014-07-04,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Several countries of the British Commonwealth, including Australia and the United Kingdom, vest in coroners the power to issue recommendations for protecting public health and safety. Little is known about whether and how organisations that receive recommendations act on them. Concerns that recommendations are frequently ignored prompted the government of Victoria, Australia, to introduce a requirement in 2008 compelling organisations that receive recommendations to provide a written statement of action.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of organisations that received recommendations from Victorian coroners over a 33-month period. Using an online survey, we asked representatives of "recipient organisations" what action (if any) their organisations took, and what factors influenced their decision. We also probed views of the quality of the recommendations and the mandatory response regime in general. Responses were analysed at the recommendation- and recipient organisation-level by calculating counts and proportions and using chi-square analyses to test for sub-group differences.

Results

Ninety of 153 recipient organisations surveyed responded (59% response rate); they received 164 recommendations (mean = 1.9; range, 1–7) from 74 cases. A total of 37% (60/164) of the recommendations were accepted and implemented, 27% (45/164) were rejected, and for 36% (59/164) the recommended action was "supplanted" (i.e., action had already been taken). In nearly half of rejected recommendations (18/45), recipient organisations indicated implementation was not logistically viable. In half of supplanted recommendations, an internal investigation had prompted the action. Three quarters (67/90) of recipient organisations believed the introduction of a mandatory response regime was a good idea, but fewer regarded the recommendations they received as appropriate (52/90) or likely to be effective in preventing death and injury (45/90).

Conclusions

Only a third of coroners’ recommendations were implemented by the organisations to which they were directed. In drawing policy lessons, it is important to separate recommendations that were rejected from those in which action had already been taken. Rejected recommendations raise questions about the quality of the recommendations, the reasonableness of the organisation’s response, or both. Supplanted recommendations focus attention on the adequacy of consultation between coroners and affected organisations and the length of time it takes for recommendations to be issued.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Sutherland et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150225153840543.pdf 195KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Freckelton I: Reforming coronership: international perspectives and contemporary developments. J Law Med 2008, 16(3):379-392.
  • [2]Pitman A: Reform of the coroners’ service in England and Wales: policy-making and politics. Psychiatr 2012, 36:1-5.
  • [3]Law Reform Commission of Western Australia: Review of Coronial Practice in Western Australia: Discussion Paper. Western Australia: Quality Press; 2011.
  • [4]Committee VLR: Review of the Coroner’s Act 1985. Victorian Government Printer: Melbourne; 2006.
  • [5]Brazil R: The coroner’s recommendation: fulfilling its potential? A perspective from the aboriginal legal service (NSW/ACT). AILR 2011, 15(1):94-100.
  • [6]Bugeja L, Ranson D: Coroners’ recommendations: do they lead to positive public health outcomes? J Law Med 2003, 10(4):399-400.
  • [7]Halstead B: Coroners’ Recommendations and the Prevention of Deaths in Custody: A Victorian Case Study. In Deaths in custody, Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology; 1995.
  • [8]Malbon J: Institutional responses to coronial recommendations. J Law Med 1998, 6:35-49.
  • [9]Bugeja L, Ibrahim J, Ozanne-Smith J, Brodie L, McClure R: Application of a public health framework to examine the characteristics of coroners recommendations for injury prevention. Inj Prev 2012, 18(5):326-333.
  • [10]Bevan D: The Coronial Recommendations Project: An Investigation into the Administrative Practice of Queensland Public Sector Agencies in Assisting Coronial Inquiries and Responding to Coronial Recommendations. Brisbane: Queensland Ombudsman; 2006.
  • [11]Commonwealth of Australia: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, National Report, Volume 1. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1991b.
  • [12]Coles D, Shaw H: Learning from Death in Custody Inquests: A New Framework for Action and Accountability. London: INQUEST Charitable Trust; 2012.
  • [13]Coroners Act 2008 (Vic)
  • [14]The Coroners (amendment) Rules 2008. England and Wales; 2008.
  • [15]Studdert M, Cordner S: Impact and coronial investigations on manner and cause of death determinations in Australia, 2000–2007. MJA 2010, 192(8):444-447.
  • [16]The Coroners Act 2008 (Vic), section 72(3)-(5).
  • [17]Watterson R, Brown P, McKenzie J: Coronial recommendations and the prevention of indigenous death. Aust Indig Law Rev 2008, 12(Special ed. 2):4-26.
  • [18]Zavyalova A, Pfarrer M, Reger R, Shapiro D: Managing the message: the effects if firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Acad Manage J 2012, 55(5):1079-1101.
  • [19]Pettigrew A: Strategy formulation as a political process. ISMO 1977, 7(2):78-97.
  • [20]Yin B: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:53次