Quadriceps performance under activation of foot dorsal extension in healthy volunteers: an interventional cohort study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Susanne Lehmann¹  André Aeschlimann¹  Stefan Nehrer²  Thomas Benz¹  Martina Kaufmann¹  Felix Angst¹ 

[1] Research Department, Rehabilitation Clinic “RehaClinic”, Quellenstrasse 34, Bad Zurzach, 5330, Switzerland;Donau-University, Krems, Austria

关键词: Standardized response mean;    Rehabilitation;    Training;    Electromyography;    Performance;    Muscle activation;    Quadriceps;    Dorsal foot extension;   

Others  :  1234035
DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-015-0774-0

 received in 2015-03-23, accepted in 2015-10-14,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The m. quadriceps femoris is the strongest muscle in the human body and plays an important role in sports, activities of daily living and independence. Two older studies showed increased electromyographic (EMG) activity of the quadriceps when the dorsal extensors of the foot were pre-activated. The aim was to physiologically replicate this finding by EMG and to verify it functionally by single leg hop.

Methods

EMG activity (root mean square, RMS) was tested on the leg press at the isometric load of the individual 12-repetition-maximum (12RM) weight (on average 79.7 kg) at 45° and 90° knee flexion. Single leg hop distance was measured between the tests. Intra-individual changes between with and without dorsal foot extension were quantified and compared by standardized response means (SRM).

Results

Thirty-five healthy subjects between 21 and 57 years were included. The m. vastus medialis was activated on average to an RMS of 32.4 μV without and 53.7 μV with dorsal foot extension (SRM = 1.39, p < 0.001) at 45° knee flexion and an RMS of 124.9 μV versus 152.8 μV (SRM = 1.08, p < 0.001) at 90°. The corresponding data for the rectus femoris were 9.4 μV versus 18.9 μV (SRM = 0.71, p < 0.001) at 45° and 77.8 μV versus 135.3 μV (SRM = 0.89, p < 0.001) at 90°. Mean single leg hop distance was 169.8 cm without versus 178.9 cm with dorsal foot extension (SRM = 1.09, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Pre-activation of dorsal foot extensors significantly increased EMG activity in the m. quadriceps femoris and single leg hop distance. It can therefore be used to improve functional quadriceps muscle performance and knee joint stability in training and rehabilitation.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Angst et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Tittel KM. quadriceps femoris. 4th ed. Urban & Fischer, Munich; 2003.
• [2]Croce RV, Russell PJ, Decoster LC. Knee muscular response strategies differ by developmental level but not gender during jump landing. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 44:339-48.
• [3]Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, Lander JE, Barrentine SW, Andrews JR, Bergemann BW, Moormann CT. Effect of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33:1552-66.
• [4]Bizzini M, Biedert R, Maffiuletti N, Impellizzeri F. Biomechanical issues in patellofemoral joint rehabilitation. Orthopade. 2008; 37:864-71.
• [5]Kelley Fitzgerald G, Piva SR, Irrgang JJ. Reports of joint instability in knee osteoarthritis: Its prevalence and relationship to physical function. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51:941-6.
• [6]Da Silva EM, Brentano MA, Cadore EL, De Almeida AP, Kruel LF. Analysis of muscle activation during different leg press exercises at submaximum effort levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2008; 22:1059-65.
• [7]Reid KF, Pasha E, Doros G, Clark DJ, Patten C, Phillips EM, Frontera WR, Fielding RA. Longitudinal decline of lower extremity muscle power in healthy and mobility-limited older adults: influence of muscle mass, strength, composition, neuromuscular activation and single fiber contractile properties. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014; 114:29-39.
• [8]Hortobagyi T, Westerkamp L, Beam S, Moody J, Garry J, Holbert D, DeVita P. Altered hamstring-quadriceps muscle balance in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech. 2005; 20:97-104.
• [9]Laube W. Pathophysiologie, Muskelatrophie (pathophysiology, muscular atrophy). Biomechanik, Bewegungslehre, Leistungsphysiologie, Trainingslehre (biomechanics, kinematics, physiology of performance, training doctrine). Hüter-Becker A, Dölken M, editors. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart; 2005. 3. 5:p.294-5
• [10]Hart JM, Fritz JM, Kerrigan DC, Saliba EN, Gansneder BM, Ingersoll CD. Quadriceps inhibition after repetitive lumbar extension exercise in persons with a history of low back pain. J Athl Train. 2006; 41:264-9.
• [11]Disselhorst-Klug C, Schmitz-Rode T, Rau G. Surface electromyography and muscle force: Limits in sEMG-force relationship and new approaches for applications. Clin Biomech. 2009; 24:225-35.
• [12]Mau-Moeller A, Behrens M, Lindner T, Bader R, Bruhn S. Age-related changes in neuromuscular function of quadriceps muscle in physically active adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23:640-8.
• [13]Tepperman SP, Mazliah J, Naumann S, Delmore T. Effect of ankle position on isometric quadriceps strengthening. Am J Phys Med. 1986; 65:69-74.
• [14]Tassi N, Filho JG, Goncales M, Vitti M, Krool LB. Electromyographic evaluation of the rectus femoris muscle during exercises performed on the leg press. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 38:223-9.
• [15]Nazario-de-Rezende F, Sousa G, Facury Neto MA, Bernardino R, Silva DC, Haddad EG, Goncales A, Santos LA. Electromyographic study of the rectus femoris and biceps femoris (long head) muscles during bilateral isotonic contraction in a 45° leg press apparatus. Biosci J. 2006; 22:95-104.
• [16]Aarkskog R, Wisnes A, Wilhelmsen K, Skogen A, Bjordal JM. Comparison of two resistance training protocols, 6RM versus 12RM, to increase the 1RM in healthy young adults. A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2012; 17:179-86.
• [17]Baechle TR, Earle RW, Wathen D. Resistance training. In: Baechle TR, Earle RW (Eds.). Essentials of strength training and conditioning. National Strength and Conditioning Association. Human Kinetics 2000;18:395–425
• [18]Ross MD, Langford B, Whelan PJ. Test-retest reliability of 4 single-leg horizontal hop tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2002; 16:617-22.
• [19]Maulder P, Cronin J. Horizontal and vertical jump assessment: reliability, symmetry, discriminative and predictive ability. Phys Ther Sport. 2005; 6:74-82.
• [20]Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989; 3 Suppl:178-89.
• [21]Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 45:384-91.
• [22]Borenstein M. Effect sizes for continuous data. The Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. Russell Sage Foundation, New York; 2009. 12:p. 221-35
• [23]Smith TO, Bowyer D, Dixon J, Stephenson R, Chester R, Donell ST. Can vastus medialis oblique be preferentially activated? A systematic review of electromygraphic studies. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009; 25:69-98.
• [24]Coombs R, Garbutt G. Developments in the use of the hamstring/quadriceps ratio for the assessment of muscle balance. J Sports Sci Med. 2002; 1:56-62.
• [25]Greenberger HB, Paterno MV. Relationship of knee extensor strength and hopping test performance in the assessment of lower extremity function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995; 22:202-6.
• [26]English R, Brannock M, Chik WT, Eastwood LS, Uhl T. The relationship between lower extremity isokinetic work and single. J Sport Rehabil. 2006; 15:95-104.
• [27]Azegami M, Yanagihashi R, Miyoshi K, Akahane K, Ohira M, Sadoyama T. Effects of multi-joint angle changes on EMG activity and force of lower extremity muscles during maximum isometric leg press exercises. J Phys Ther Sci. 2007; 19:65-72.