| BMC Gastroenterology | |
| High success rate of repeat colonoscopy with standard endoscopes in patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy | |
| Rajesh N Keswani1  Annapoorani Veerappan1  Andrew J Gawron2  | |
| [1] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA;Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA | |
| 关键词: Difficult colonoscopy; Endoscopy; Enteroscopes; Incomplete colonoscopy; | |
| Others : 855651 DOI : 10.1186/1471-230X-14-56 |
|
| received in 2013-07-15, accepted in 2014-03-21, 发布年份 2014 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
In patients with incomplete colonoscopy, cecal intubation is sometimes unsuccessful due to a redundant or tortuous colon. Repeat colonoscopy may be successful with the use of alternate endoscopes or careful attention to technique but limited outcomes data is available. The aim of this study was to describe the technique, success rate and outcomes of consecutive patients referred for previous incomplete colonoscopy.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective chart review of incomplete colonoscopy procedures in patients age 18-90 at an academic teaching hospital referred to an endoscopist specializing in difficult colonoscopy.
Results
Cecal intubation was successful in 96 of 100 repeat colonoscopies and 83 procedures were completed with a standard endoscope (adult, pediatric, or gastroscope). The adenoma detection rate was 28% for successful repeat colonoscopies; a majority of these patients had no adenomas identified on incomplete exam. In 69.4% of cases, an endoscope was used to successfully complete colonoscopy that was not used in the incomplete colonoscopy. The median insertion time was significantly less for the complete colonoscopy (10.6 min) compared to the incomplete colonoscopy (18.8 min, P = 0.004).
Conclusions
Repeat colonoscopy has a high success rate and identified a significant number of new adenomas. Use of all available endoscopes should be considered prior to procedure termination in patients with a tortuous colon. Repeat colonoscopy can often be accomplished using a standard endoscope and is not attributed to increased endoscope insertion time.
【 授权许可】
2014 Gawron et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140722054830832.pdf | 560KB | ||
| 59KB | Image | ||
| 26KB | Image | ||
| 25KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR: Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterol 2012, 143:844-857.
- [2]Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, Gangarosa LM, Thiny MT, Stizenberg K, Morgan DR, Ringle Y, Kim HP, Dibonaventura MD, Carroll CF, Allen JK, Cook SF, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD, Shaheen NJ: Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterol 2012, 143:1179-1187. e1171-1173
- [3]Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM: Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:873-885.
- [4]Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L: Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterol 2007, 132:2297-2303.
- [5]Kao KT, Tam M, Sekhon H, Wijeratne R, Haigh PI, Abbas MA: Should barium enema be the next step following an incomplete colonoscopy? In J Colorectal Dis 2010, 25:1353-1357.
- [6]Sakamoto T, Mitsuzaki K, Utsunomiya D, Matsuda K, Yamamura S, Urata J, Kawakami M, Yamashita Y: Detection of flat colorectal polyps at screening CT colonography in comparison with conventional polypoid lesions. Acta Radiol 2012, 53:714-719.
- [7]Neerincx M, Droste JS T s, Mulder CJ, Rakers M, Bartelsman JF, Loffeld RJ, Tuynman HA, Brohet RM, van der Hulst RW: Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 2010, 42:730-735.
- [8]Morini S, Zullo A, Hassan C, Lorenzetti R, Campo SM: Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both? In J Colorectal Dis 2011, 26:103-108.
- [9]Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR: Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 189:774-779.
- [10]Rex DK, Chen SC, Overhiser AJ: Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:879-883.
- [11]Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Friedland S: Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Dig Liv Dis 2006, 38:921-925.
- [12]Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA: Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:848-853.
- [13]Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B, Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA: Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 25:80-83.
- [14]Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Tsukune Y, Fujisawa M, Yazaki T, Uchida T, Gocyo S, Okita I, Shirakura K, Sasao K, Salto T, Sakamoto I, Igarashi M, Koike J, Takagi A, Mine T: Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study. Endoscopy 2012, 44:38-42.
- [15]Hotta K, Katsuki S, Ohata K, Abe T, Endo M, Shimatani M, Nagaya T, Kusaka T, Matsuda T, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Murakami Y, Salto Y: A multicenter, prospective trial of total colonoscopy using a short double-balloon endoscope in patients with previous incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:813-818.
- [16]Keswani RN: Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:507-512.
- [17]Dzeletovic I, Harrison ME, Pasha SF, Crowell MD, Decker GA, Gurudu SR, Leighton JA: Comparison of single- versus double-balloon assisted-colonoscopy for colon examination after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2012, 57:2680-2686.
- [18]Schembre DB, Ross AS, Gluck MN, Brandabur JJ, McCormick SE, Lin OS: Spiral overtube-assisted colonoscopy after incomplete colonoscopy in the redundant colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:515-519.
- [19]Gawron AJ, Veerappan A, McCarthy ST, Kankanala V, Keswani RN: Impact of an incomplete colonoscopy referral program on recommendations after incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2013, 58:1849-1855.
- [20]Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK: Water immersion simplifies cecal intubation in patients with redundant colons and previous incomplete colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 76:812-817.
- [21]Brahmania M, Park J, Svarta S, Tong J, Kwok R, Enns R: Incomplete colonoscopy: maximizing completion rates of gastroenterologists. Can J Gastroentrol 2012, 26:589-592.
PDF