Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children’s decision-making competence?

BMC Medical Ethics

Ramón J L Lindauer²  Joost G Daams¹  Martine C de Vries³  Alice Broersma⁴  Pieter W Troost²  Irma M Hein² 

[1]Department of Clinical Library, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands

[2]Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, 1105 Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands

[3]Department of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands

[4]Department of Legal Affairs, Accare Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, PO Box 39, 9400 Assen, AA, The Netherlands

关键词: Assessment;    Treatment;    Clinical research;    Decision-making;    Minor;    Informed consent;    Mental competence;   

Others  :  1089929
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6939-16-1

 received in 2014-10-10, accepted in 2015-01-06,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

For decades, the discussion on children’s competence to consent to medical issues has concentrated around normative concerns, with little progress in clinical practices. Decision-making competence is an important condition in the informed consent model. In pediatrics, clinicians need to strike a proper balance in order to both protect children’s interests when they are not fully able to do so themselves and to respect their autonomy when they are. Children’s competence to consent, however, is currently not assessed in a standardized way. Moreover, the correlation between competence to give informed consent and age in children has never been systematically investigated, nor do we know which factors exactly contribute to children’s competence.

This article aims at identifying these gaps in knowledge and suggests options for dealing with the obstacles in empirical research in order to advance policies and practices regarding children’s medical decision-making competence.

Discussion

Understanding children’s competency is hampered by the law. Legislative regulations concerning competency are established on a strong presumption that persons older than a certain age are competent, whereas younger persons are not. Furthermore, a number of contextual factors are believed to be of influence on a child’s decision-making competence: the developmental stage of children, the influence of parents and peers, the quality of information provision, life experience, the type of medical decision, and so on. Ostensibly, these diverse and extensive barriers hinder any form of advancement in this conflicted area. Addressing these obstacles encourages the discussion on children’s competency, in which the most prominent question concerns the lack of a clear operationalization of children’s competence to consent. Empirical data are needed to substantiate the discussion.

Summary

The empirical approach offers an opportunity to give direction to the debate. Recommendations for future research include: studying a standardized assessment instrument covering all four relevant dimensions of competence (understanding, reasoning, appreciation, expressing a choice), including a study population of children covering the full age range of 7 to 18 years, improving information provision, and assessing relevant contextual data.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Hein et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Appelbaum PS, Grisso T: The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press; 2001.
• [2]Hein IM, Daams J, Troost PW, Lindeboom R, Lindauer RJL: Accuracy of assessment instruments for patients’ competence to consent to medical treatment or research. (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014., (5) doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011099
• [3]Melton GB, Koocher GP, Saks MJ: Children’s competence to consent. New York: Pelnum Press; 1983.
• [4]Knox CA, Burkhart PV: Issues related to children participating in clinical research. J Pediatr Nurs 2007, 22:310-8.
• [5]Gaylin W: The “competence” of children. No longer all or none. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1982, 21:153-62.
• [6]De Lourdes LM, Larcher V, Kurz R: Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 2003, 162:629-33.
• [7]Shaw M: Competence and consent to treatment in children and adolescents. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2001, 7:150-9.
• [8]Stultiens L, Goffin T, Borry P, Dierickx K, Nys H: Minors and informed consent: a comparative approach. Eur J Health Law 2007, 14:21-46.
• [9]Grisso T, Vierling L: Minors’ consent to treatment: a developmental perspective. Prof Psychol 1978, 9:412-27.
• [10]United States Department of Health and Human Services: Code of Federal Regulations. 45 CFR 46:408. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Subpart D). Washington DC, United States: United States Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Ref Type: Statute
• [11]Alderson P: Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Soc Sci Med 2007, 65:2272-83.
• [12]Broome ME: Consent (assent) for research with pediatric patients. Semin Oncol Nurs 1999, 15:96-103.
• [13]Tan JO, Fegert JM: Capacity and competence in child and adolescent psychiatry. Health Care Anal 2004, 12:285-94.
• [14]Scherer DG, Annett RD, Brody JL: Ethical issues in adolescent and parent informed consent for pediatric asthma research participation. J Asthma 2007, 44:489-96.
• [15]Kafaar Z, Swartz L, Kagee A, Lesch A, Jaspan H: Adolescent participation in HIV vaccine trials: Cognitive developmental considerations. South African Journal of Psychology 2007, 37:576-94.
• [16]Piker A: Balancing liberation and protection: a moderate approach to adolescent health care decision-making. Bioethics 2011, 25:202-8.
• [17]Partridge BC: Adolescent psychological development, parenting styles, and pediatric decision making. J Med Philos 2010, 35:518-25.
• [18]Bluebond-Langner M, Belasco JB, DeMesquita WM: “I want to live, until I don’t want to live anymore”: involving children with life-threatening and life-shortening illnesses in decision making about care and treatment. Nurs Clin North Am 2010, 45:329-43.
• [19]Larcher V, Hutchinson A: How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? Arch Dis Child 2010, 95:307-11.
• [20]Martenson EK, Fagerskiold AM: A review of children’s decision-making competence in health care. J Clin Nurs 2008, 17:3131-41.
• [21]Miller VA, Drotar D, Kodish E: Children’s competence for assent and consent: a review of empirical findings. Ethics Behav 2004, 14:255-95.
• [22]Pearce J: Consent to treatment during childhood. Br Med J 1994, 165:713-6.
• [23]Turrell SL, Peterson-Badali M, Katzman DK: Consent to treatment in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2011, 44:703-7.
• [24]Koelch M, Prestel A, Singer H, Schulze U, Fegert JM: Report of an initial pilot study on the feasibility of using the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2010, 20:63-7.
• [25]Lind C, Anderson B, Oberle K: Ethical issues in adolescent consent for research. Nurs Ethics 2003, 10:504-11.
• [26]Buchanan AE, Brock DW: Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge [U.K.] New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
• [27]Vellinga A: To Know or Not to Be. Drukkerij Nivo: Delft; 2006.
• [28]Dunn LB, Nowrangi MA, Palmer BW, Jeste DV, Saks ER: Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. Am J Psychiatry 2006, 163:1323-34.
• [29]Kim SY, Caine ED, Currier GW, Leibovici A, Ryan JM: Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer’s disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. Am J Psychiatry 2001, 158:712-7.
• [30]Kim SY, Appelbaum PS, Swan J, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Goff DC, et al.: Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research. Br J Psychiatry 2007, 191:38-43.
• [31]Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C: The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatr Serv 1997, 48:1415-9.
• [32]Hein IM, Troost PW, Lindeboom R, de Vries MC, Zwaan CM, Lindauer RJ: Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study. BMC Pediatr 2012, 12:156. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Meynen G: Exploring the similarities and differences between medical assessments of competence and criminal responsibility. Med Health Care Philos 2009, 12:443-51.
• [34]Scherer DG: The capacities of minors to exercise voluntariness in medical treatment decisions. Law Hum Behav 1991, 15:431-49.